| Literature DB >> 31094288 |
C L de Mol1, Yym Wong1, E D van Pelt1, Bha Wokke1, Tam Siepman1, R F Neuteboom2, D Hamann3, R Q Hintzen1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the Dutch nationwide incidence of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG-associated acquired demyelinating syndromes (ADS) and to describe the clinical and serological characteristics of these patients.Entities:
Keywords: Acquired demyelinating syndromes; adults; anti-MOG antibodies; children; incidence; multiple sclerosis variants
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31094288 PMCID: PMC7294530 DOI: 10.1177/1352458519845112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mult Scler ISSN: 1352-4585 Impact factor: 6.312
Incidence figures of anti-MOG seropositivity in the Netherlands.
| Year | Incidence in children per 100,000 people | Number of Dutch paediatric inhabitants | Number of MOG-IgG-seropositive paediatric patients/year | Incidence in adults per 100,000 people | Number of Dutch adult inhabitants | Number of MOG-IgG-seropositive adult patients/year | Overall incidence per 100,000 people |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 0.06 | 3.442.802 | 2 | 0.05 | 13.386.487 | 7 | 0.05 |
| 2015 | 0.20 | 3.429.193 | 7 | 0.11 | 13.471.533 | 15 | 0.13 |
| 2016 | 0.26 | 3.416.581 | 9 | 0.08 | 13.562.539 | 11 | 0.12 |
| 2017 | 0.47 | 3.404.098 | 16 | 0.18 | 13.677.409 | 25 | 0.24 |
| Mean/year | 0.31 | 3.416.624 | 11 | 0.13 | 13.570.493 | 17 | 0.16 |
MOG: myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein; CI: confidence interval.
Clinical characteristics of MOG-IgG-seropositive patients.
| Children | Adults | All | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, median (IQR), years | 8.7 (5.7–12.3) | 32.6 (25.4–48.6) | 16.6 (7.9–31.9) | <0.001 |
| Sex, female, | 16 (47) | 12 (44) | 28 (46) | 0.8 |
| AID comorbidity, | 1 (3) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 1.0 |
| Caucasian, | 23 (68) | 22 (81) | 45 (74) | 0.3 |
| Type of onset, | <0.001 | |||
| ON | 7 (21) | 12 (44) | 19 (31) | |
| Bilateral | 2/7 (29) | 7/12 (58) | 9/19 (47) | |
| TM | 1 (3) | 11 (41) | 12 (20) | |
| LETM | 1/1 (100) | 5/11 (42) | 6/12 (50) | |
| Brainstem syndrome | 1 (3) | 1 (4) | 2 (3) | |
| CIS other | 1 (3) | 0 | 1 (2) | |
| NMO | 5 (15) | 3 (11) | 8 (13) | |
| ADEM | 19 (56) | 0 (0) | 19 (31) | |
| MRI brain lesions, | 23/32 (72) | 7/27 (26) | 30/59 (51) | 0.001 |
| Poorly demarcated (deep) grey and white matter involvement | 16 (70) | 0 | 16 (53) | < 0.001 |
| Gyral filling | 11 (48) | 0 | 11 (37) | 0.003 |
| Extensive confluent white matter lesions | 2 (9) | 0 | 2 (7) | 0.5 |
| Well-demarcated ovoid lesions (MS-like) | 4 (17) | 3 (43) | 7 (23) | 1.0 |
| Non-specific lesions | 3 (13) | 5 (71) | 8 (27) | 0.1 |
| MRI spine lesions, | 13/22 (59) | 13/22 (59) | 26/44 (59) | 1.0 |
| Cervical | 10 (77) | 9 (69) | 19 (73) | 1.0 |
| Thoracic | 12 (92) | 8 (57) | 20 (77) | 0.3 |
| Lumbar | 6 (46) | 0 (0) | 6/26 (23) | 0.02 |
| ⩾2 CSF unique OCB, | 3 (11) | 5 (28) | 8 (18) | 0.3 |
| Relapsing disease, | 9 (27) | 11 (41) | 20 (33) | 0.2 |
| Time to first relapse, median (range), months | 10.5 (1.8–322.1) | 7.7 (0.4–218.7) | 8.0 (0.4–322.1) | 0.5 |
| Use of IMT, | 12 (36) | 8 (30) | 20 (33) | 0.6 |
| Follow-up time, median (IQR), months | 30.7 (10.3–71.2) | 20.2 (11.3–43.0) | 27.5 (11.3–61.9) | 0.5 |
| Type at last follow-up, | <0.001 | |||
| ON | 6 (18) | 10 (37) | 16 (26) | |
| Bilateral | 3/6 (50) | 6/10 (60) | 9/16 (56) | |
| TM | 1 (3) | 8 (30) | 9 (15) | |
| LETM | 1/1 (100) | 3/8 (38) | 4/9 (44) | |
| Brainstem syndrome | 0 (0) | 1 (4) | 1 (2) | |
| Monophasic ADEM | 14 (41) | 0 (0) | 14 (23) | |
| NMO | 6 (18) | 8 (30) | 13 (21) | |
| Other[ | 7 (21) | 0 (0) | 7 (12) |
IQR: interquartile range; AID: autoimmune diseases; ON: optic neuritis; TM: transverse myelitis; LETM: longitudinal extended transverse myelitis; CIS: clinically isolated syndrome other than ON or TM; NMO: neuromyelitis optica with ON and TM involvement; ADEM: acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; OCB: oligoclonal bands; IMT: immunomodulatory treatment.
This table related to the subgroup of 61 out of the 92 MOG-IgG-seropositive patients (66%) for which we had clinical data available at the National ADS centre.
Other (n = 7): children were diagnosed with ADEM-ON (n = 3), ADEM-TM (n = 1), ON followed by cortical phenotype (epilepsy and hemiparesis, n = 1), CIS (n = 1) and relapsing remitting MS (n = 1).
Considered significant if p-value < 0.05. Comparison between adults and children.
Figure 1.Distribution of clinical phenotypes in adults and children: (a) phenotypes at first presentation; (b) phenotypes at last follow-up. Other (n = 7) children were diagnosed with ADEM-ON (n = 3), ADEM-TM (n = 1), ON followed by cortical phenotype (epilepsy and hemiparesis, n = 1), clinically isolated syndrome (CIS, n = 1) and relapsing remitting MS (n = 1). Striped areas: bilateral optic neuritis and longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis, respectively.
ON: optic neuritis; TM: transverse myelitis; CIS: clinically isolated syndromes other than ON or TM (other CIS); NMO: neuromyelitis optica; ADEM: acute disseminated encephalomyelitis.
Figure 2.Longitudinal analysis of clinical and serological data; 25 of the 61 MOG-IgG-positive patients who were known at the National ADS centre were tested serially for MOG-IgG. Patients are classified into four groups according to their disease course (relapsing or monophasic) and the results of the last tested serum sample of that patient.