Literature DB >> 31093705

Deep learning for liver tumor diagnosis part II: convolutional neural network interpretation using radiologic imaging features.

Clinton J Wang1, Charlie A Hamm1,2, Lynn J Savic1,2, Marc Ferrante1, Isabel Schobert1,2, Todd Schlachter1, MingDe Lin1, Jeffrey C Weinreb1, James S Duncan1,3, Julius Chapiro4, Brian Letzen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a proof-of-concept "interpretable" deep learning prototype that justifies aspects of its predictions from a pre-trained hepatic lesion classifier.
METHODS: A convolutional neural network (CNN) was engineered and trained to classify six hepatic tumor entities using 494 lesions on multi-phasic MRI, described in Part 1. A subset of each lesion class was labeled with up to four key imaging features per lesion. A post hoc algorithm inferred the presence of these features in a test set of 60 lesions by analyzing activation patterns of the pre-trained CNN model. Feature maps were generated that highlight regions in the original image that correspond to particular features. Additionally, relevance scores were assigned to each identified feature, denoting the relative contribution of a feature to the predicted lesion classification.
RESULTS: The interpretable deep learning system achieved 76.5% positive predictive value and 82.9% sensitivity in identifying the correct radiological features present in each test lesion. The model misclassified 12% of lesions. Incorrect features were found more often in misclassified lesions than correctly identified lesions (60.4% vs. 85.6%). Feature maps were consistent with original image voxels contributing to each imaging feature. Feature relevance scores tended to reflect the most prominent imaging criteria for each class.
CONCLUSIONS: This interpretable deep learning system demonstrates proof of principle for illuminating portions of a pre-trained deep neural network's decision-making, by analyzing inner layers and automatically describing features contributing to predictions. KEY POINTS: • An interpretable deep learning system prototype can explain aspects of its decision-making by identifying relevant imaging features and showing where these features are found on an image, facilitating clinical translation. • By providing feedback on the importance of various radiological features in performing differential diagnosis, interpretable deep learning systems have the potential to interface with standardized reporting systems such as LI-RADS, validating ancillary features and improving clinical practicality. • An interpretable deep learning system could potentially add quantitative data to radiologic reports and serve radiologists with evidence-based decision support.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Liver cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31093705      PMCID: PMC7243989          DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06214-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  17 in total

Review 1.  Management implications and outcomes of LI-RADS-2, -3, -4, and -M category observations.

Authors:  Donald G Mitchell; Mustafa R Bashir; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-01

Review 2.  Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Review of Ancillary Imaging Features.

Authors:  Irene Cruite; Cynthia Santillan; Adrija Mamidipalli; Amol Shah; An Tang; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 0.800

3.  LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System): summary, discussion, and consensus of the LI-RADS Management Working Group and future directions.

Authors:  Donald G Mitchell; Jordi Bruix; Morris Sherman; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Reliability, Validity, and Reader Acceptance of LI-RADS-An In-depth Analysis.

Authors:  Borna K Barth; Olivio F Donati; Michael A Fischer; Erika J Ulbrich; Christoph A Karlo; Anton Becker; Burkhard Seifert; Caecilia S Reiner
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 5.  Hepatocarcinogenesis and LI-RADS.

Authors:  Kazim H Narsinh; Jennifer Cui; Demetri Papadatos; Claude B Sirlin; Cynthia S Santillan
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-01

Review 6.  Deep Learning: A Primer for Radiologists.

Authors:  Gabriel Chartrand; Phillip M Cheng; Eugene Vorontsov; Michal Drozdzal; Simon Turcotte; Christopher J Pal; Samuel Kadoury; An Tang
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 7.  LI-RADS: a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  Claude B Sirlin; Ania Z Kielar; An Tang; Mustafa R Bashir
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-01

8.  Rate of observation and inter-observer agreement for LI-RADS major features at CT and MRI in 184 pathology proven hepatocellular carcinomas.

Authors:  Eric C Ehman; Spencer C Behr; Sarah E Umetsu; Nicholas Fidelman; Ben M Yeh; Linda D Ferrell; Thomas A Hope
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05

Review 9.  Evidence Supporting LI-RADS Major Features for CT- and MR Imaging-based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  An Tang; Mustafa R Bashir; Michael T Corwin; Irene Cruite; Christoph F Dietrich; Richard K G Do; Eric C Ehman; Kathryn J Fowler; Hero K Hussain; Reena C Jha; Adib R Karam; Adrija Mamidipalli; Robert M Marks; Donald G Mitchell; Tara A Morgan; Michael A Ohliger; Amol Shah; Kim-Nhien Vu; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Nonstandardized Terminology to Describe Focal Liver Lesions in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Implications Regarding Clinical Communication.

Authors:  Michael T Corwin; Andrew Y Lee; Ghaneh Fananapazir; Thomas W Loehfelm; Souvik Sarkar; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  The overview of the deep learning integrated into the medical imaging of liver: a review.

Authors:  Kailai Xiang; Baihui Jiang; Dong Shang
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 6.047

2.  Assessment of knee pain from MR imaging using a convolutional Siamese network.

Authors:  Gary H Chang; David T Felson; Shangran Qiu; Ali Guermazi; Terence D Capellini; Vijaya B Kolachalama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Classification of hepatic cavernous hemangioma or hepatocellular carcinoma using a convolutional neural network model.

Authors:  Yunbao Cao; Jing Yu; Hu Zhang; Jian Xiong; Zhonghua Luo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-04

4.  Deep learning radiomics for focal liver lesions diagnosis on long-range contrast-enhanced ultrasound and clinical factors.

Authors:  Li Liu; Chunlin Tang; Lu Li; Ping Chen; Ying Tan; Xiaofei Hu; Kaixuan Chen; Yongning Shang; Deng Liu; He Liu; Hongjun Liu; Fang Nie; Jiawei Tian; Mingchang Zhao; Wen He; Yanli Guo
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence for the prevention and clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Julien Calderaro; Tobias Paul Seraphin; Tom Luedde; Tracey G Simon
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 30.083

6.  Automatized Hepatic Tumor Volume Analysis of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases by Gd-EOB MRI-A Deep-Learning Model to Support Multidisciplinary Cancer Conference Decision-Making.

Authors:  Uli Fehrenbach; Siyi Xin; Alexander Hartenstein; Timo Alexander Auer; Franziska Dräger; Konrad Froböse; Henning Jann; Martina Mogl; Holger Amthauer; Dominik Geisel; Timm Denecke; Bertram Wiedenmann; Tobias Penzkofer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Deep transfer learning based on magnetic resonance imaging can improve the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin Li; Yang Zhou; Peng Wang; Henan Zhao; Xinxin Wang; Na Tang; Kuan Luan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

Review 8.  Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in oncological imaging.

Authors:  H M C Cheung; D Rubin
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.389

9.  The Value of Convolutional Neural Network-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging Image Segmentation Algorithm to Guide Targeted Controlled Release of Doxorubicin Nanopreparation.

Authors:  Hujun Liu; Hui Gao; Fei Jia
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  A Semi-Automatic Step-by-Step Expert-Guided LI-RADS Grading System Based on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Ruofan Sheng; Jing Huang; Weiguo Zhang; Kaipu Jin; Li Yang; Huanhuan Chong; Jia Fan; Jian Zhou; Dijia Wu; Mengsu Zeng
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2021-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.