| Literature DB >> 31093271 |
Mariangela Gennaro1, Alessandro Mattiello2, Tommaso Pizzorusso1,3.
Abstract
Cerebral ischemia can occur at any stage in life, but clinical consequences greatly differ depending on the developmental stage of the affected brain structures. Timing of the lesion occurrence seems to be critical, as it strongly interferes with neuronal circuit development and determines the way spontaneous plasticity takes place. Translational stroke research requires the use of animal models as they represent a reliable tool to understand the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the generation, progression, and pathological consequences of a stroke. Moreover, in vivo experiments are instrumental to investigate new therapeutic strategies and the best temporal window of intervention. Differently from adults, very few models of the human developmental stroke have been characterized, and most of them have been established in rodents. The models currently used provide a better understanding of the molecular factors involved in the effects of ischemia; however, they still hold many limitations due to matching developmental stages across different species and the complexity of the human disorder that hardly can be described by segregated variables. In this review, we summarize the key factors contributing to neonatal brain vulnerability to ischemic strokes and we provide an overview of the advantages and limitations of the currently available models to recapitulate different aspects of the human developmental stroke.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31093271 PMCID: PMC6476045 DOI: 10.1155/2019/5089321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Figure 1Comparison between the rodent and human development of some molecular, cellular, and structural elements of the nervous system. The grey rectangle depicts the “perinatal” range throughout life. Perinatal insults, such as an ischemic stroke, that hit during this age can interfere with several aspects of neural development.
Summary of main rodent models of the developmental stroke used in translational research.
| Animal | Age of lesion induction | Method of induction | Age of assessment | Variables assessed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rat [ | P7 [ | Hypoxia-ischemia based on the Levine-Rice method | Up to P11 [ | Analysis of damage by MRI [ |
|
| ||||
| Rat | P7 | Embolus MCAO | Up to P8 | Analysis of lesion volume by histology [ |
|
| ||||
| Rat | P7 | MCA electrocoagulation associated with 1-hour left CCAO | Up to P90 | Analysis of inflammatory responses by histology [ |
|
| ||||
| Rat [ | P14-P18 [ | Transient MCAO | P8 [ | Analysis of lesion volume by histology [ |
|
| ||||
| Mouse [ | P12 [ | MCAO | Up to P68 [ | Analysis of lesion volume by histology and behavioral assessment of functional deficits [ |
|
| ||||
| Mouse [ | From P3 to P10 [ | Chronic hypoxia | P10 and P48 [ | Analysis of injury by histology and unbiased stereological analysis of neurogenesis by BrdU assay [ |
|
| ||||
| Rat | P7 | Photothrombosis | P12 and P25 | Study of PTZ-seizure susceptibility by EEG recordings [ |
|
| ||||
| Rat [ | P14 [ | ET1 injection: intracortical [ | From P60 [ | Assessment of lesion timing on damage volume, long-term motor outcome, and axonal sprouting of contralesional CST at the red nucleus and spinal cord level using anterograde tracing [ |
Figure 2(a) Molecular and environmental factors involved in physiological CST development in rodents. (b) Processes altered after a brain injury that hits during CST development. Insets show some of the mechanisms involved in the acute damage provoked by cerebral ischemia (excitotoxicity, top right) and the factor involved in the axonal pathfinding and midline crossing in the CST development (EphA4/EphrinB3, bottom right).