Literature DB >> 31092511

Switching immunoglobulin products, what are the implications? Result of 2018 census of immunology centres.

Claire Bethune1, Richard Herriot2.   

Abstract

The use of regular infusions of immunoglobulin is well established as a treatment for patients with antibody deficiency and for patients requiring immunomodulation. Although efficacy is believed to be equivalent for the different immunoglobulin products, it is generally regarded as best practice not to switch from one product to another unless there is a clinical reason to change. Changes in commissioning guidance and issues with the supply of some immunoglobulin products to the UK resulted in a requirement for a significant number of patients to switch between immunoglobulin products in 2017-2018. Data from the 2018 UK Primary Immunodeficiency census has been used to evaluate the clinical results of switching. Results from 30 immunology centres reported a total of 802 immunoglobulin product switches. Twelve reactions were recorded, none of which required admission to hospital, one patient was treated with oral corticosteroids, the others required either no treatment or treatment with oral antihistamines. This review of immunoglobulin product switch reactions gives a clearer indication regarding the safety of product switching than has previously been published. © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immunoglobulin; immunodeficiency; immunomodulation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31092511      PMCID: PMC6542228          DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3-201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  4 in total

Review 1.  Safety and availability of immunoglobulin replacement therapy in relation to potentially transmissable agents. IUIS Committee on Primary Immunodeficiency Disease. International Union of Immunological Societies.

Authors:  H M Chapel
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Increased risk of adverse events when changing intravenous immunoglobulin preparations.

Authors:  R Ameratunga; J Sinclair; J Kolbe
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Should therapeutic immunoglobulin be considered a generic product? An evidence-based approach.

Authors:  Siraj A Misbah
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2013-10-31

4.  Adverse reactions of prophylactic intravenous immunoglobulin infusions in Iranian patients with primary immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Asghar Aghamohammadi; Abolhasan Farhoudi; Mohsen Nikzad; Mostafa Moin; Zahra Pourpak; Nima Rezaei; Mohammad Gharagozlou; Masoud Movahedi; Lida Atarod; Akefeh Ahmadi Afshar; Nasrin Bazargan; Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.347

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  More a hammer than a mirror.

Authors:  Anton Emmanuel
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.659

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.