| Literature DB >> 31092364 |
Anna Sureda1, Eva Domingo-Domenech2, Ashish Gautam3.
Abstract
Neutropenia, specifically febrile neutropenia (FN), can have profound sequelae (infection, hospitalization, mortality), and the risk of its development differs across chemotherapy regimens/according to patient characteristics. We conducted a comprehensive literature review regarding neutropenia in frontline treatment of adults with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. Guidelines state primary prophylaxis (PP) with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) should be implemented when the risk of FN is ≥20%; CSF PP is given with standard-of-care escalated BEACOPP, but the risk of FN with standard-of-care ABVD does not necessitate routine PP. Notably, the risk of neutropenia (including FN) is higher in clinical practice versus clinical studies, and physicians overestimate their adherence to CSF guidelines. ECHELON-1 demonstrated higher FN rates with brentuximab vedotin plus AVD (A + AVD) compared with ABVD (19% vs 8%) and led to the recommendation of PP with granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF) for all A + AVD patients, highlighting the importance of readjusting our risk-assessment thinking as standard backbone regimens are modified.Entities:
Keywords: Febrile neutropenia; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; Hodgkin lymphoma
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31092364 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.03.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ISSN: 1040-8428 Impact factor: 6.312