Literature DB >> 31092306

Postapproval Monitoring Practices at Biomedical Research Facilities.

Jennifer N Davis1, William Greer, Ron E Banks2, Blythe H Philips3, James O Marx4.   

Abstract

Federal regulations and policies require institutions to establish procedures for ongoing IACUC oversight of approved animal care and use program activities including animal procedures. To fulfill these requirements, research institutions implement postapproval monitoring (PAM) programs designed to assure compliance in animal activities. Although several references commenting on the requirement to conduct PAM are available, few publications discuss actual best practices for accomplishing PAM. Here we use information collected through a survey of large academic research institutions to identify common practices for conducting PAM reviews. Many similarities and differences exist between institutions, which may or may not influence the overall quality of an institution's PAM program.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31092306      PMCID: PMC6643091          DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  12 in total

1.  Protocol audits for post-approval monitoring of animal use protocols.

Authors:  Jamie F Smelser; Stephen L Gardella; Betty L Austin
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 2.  Establishing a culture of care, conscience, and responsibility: addressing the improvement of scientific discovery and animal welfare through science-based performance standards.

Authors:  H J Klein; K A Bayne
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2007

3.  The institutional official and postapproval monitoring: the view from 10,000 feet.

Authors:  Robert P Lowman
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2008

4.  Program oversight enhancements (POE): the big PAM.

Authors:  Aaron Plante; Mary Lou James
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2008

5.  A guide to risk assessment in animal care and use programs: the metaphor of the 3-legged stool.

Authors:  Richard C Van Sluyters
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2008

6.  Postapproval monitoring and the IACUC.

Authors:  J G Collins
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2008

7.  Postapproval monitoring and the role of the compliance office.

Authors:  William E Dale
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2008

8.  Introduction: mitigating risk, facilitating research.

Authors:  Kathryn A Bayne; Nelson L Garnett
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2008

9.  Avoiding an overzealous approach: a perspective on regulatory burden.

Authors:  J R Haywood; Molly Greene
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2008

10.  A sample postapproval monitoring program in academia.

Authors:  Ron E Banks; John N Norton
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2008
View more
  1 in total

1.  Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Postapproval Monitoring Programs: A Proposed Comprehensive Classification Scheme.

Authors:  Stacy L Pritt; Trina M Smith
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 1.232

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.