Literature DB >> 31092121

Women and Men Use Different Strategies to Stabilize the Head in Response to Impulsive Loads: Implications for Concussion Injury Risk.

Bara Alsalaheen, Kelly Johns, Ryan Bean, Andrea Almeida, James Eckner, Matthew Lorincz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical musculoskeletal and neuromuscular attributes, which may vary between men and women, influence an individual's capacity to stabilize the head.
OBJECTIVES: To examine sex differences in cervical musculoskeletal and neuromuscular attributes and their impact on head stability. The secondary objective was to examine the effects of anticipation and preload on head kinematics.
METHODS: Thirty-four (20 men, 14 women) recreationally active adult athletes completed a perturbation protocol with anticipation and preloading conditions in this descriptive cross-sectional study. We assessed the neuromuscular response of the sternocleidomastoid to perturbation and head kinematics. We measured neck girth, sternocleidomastoid physiological cross-sectional area, and isometric strength.
RESULTS: Women had smaller neck girth, smaller sternocleidomastoid physiological cross-sectional area, and lower isometric strength than men. Women had greater baseline electromyography (EMG) amplitude and greater peak EMG response than men. There were no sex differences in sternocleidomastoid onset latency or head kinematics. Women had a greater increase in baseline EMG amplitude after preloading and anticipated conditions. Preloading attenuated sex differences in muscle onset latency. Across the sexes, there was a significant main effect of anticipation on head kinematics.
CONCLUSION: Men and women used different strategies to stabilize the head, and responded differently to the preloading and anticipation conditions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(11):779-786. Epub 15 May 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8760.

Entities:  

Keywords:  head injury; loading; neck; perturbation; response; stability

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31092121     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  6 in total

1.  The clinical utility of the cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) in university-level athletes with concussion.

Authors:  Lilian Felipe; Jeremy A Shelton
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Cervical Muscle Activation Characteristics and Head Kinematics in Males and Females Following Acoustic Warnings and Impulsive Head Forces.

Authors:  Mohammad Homayounpour; Nicholas G Gomez; Alexandra C Ingram; Brittany Coats; Andrew S Merryweather
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Identifying degenerative effects of repetitive head trauma with neuroimaging: a clinically-oriented review.

Authors:  Breton M Asken; Gil D Rabinovici
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 7.801

Review 4.  Considering Biological Sex in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Anat Biegon
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  The Effect of the FIFA 11 + with Added Neck Exercises on Maximal Isometric Neck Strength and Peak Head Impact Magnitude During Heading: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Kerry Peek; Jordan Andersen; Marnee J McKay; Theo Versteegh; Ian A Gilchrist; Tim Meyer; Andrew Gardner
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 11.928

6.  Head and Neck Characteristics as Risk Factors For and Protective Factors Against Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Military and Sporting Populations: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nicholas J Cooney; Paul Sowman; Nathan Schilaty; Nathaniel Bates; Timothy E Hewett; Tim L A Doyle
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 11.928

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.