| Literature DB >> 31091816 |
Jiachang Feng1, Jianpeng Dou2, Zidan Wu3, Dongxue Yin4, Wenfu Wu5.
Abstract
For the wise use of fungal biocontrol andEntities:
Keywords: alginate; controlled release; kaolin; metalaxyl; rice husk powder; spore; starch
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31091816 PMCID: PMC6572238 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24101858
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Formulation parameters for the synthesis of starch–alginate beads, for which the amount of metalaxyl and the concentration of CaCl2 solution in each formulation was 5 mg and 0.1 M, respectively.
| Sample | Starch | Alginate | Kaolin | Rice Husk Powder | Beads Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA | 10 | 1.5 | - | - | 1.76 |
| SAK1 | 10 | 1.5 | 1 | - | 2.16 |
| SAK2 | 10 | 1.5 | 2 | - | 2.53 |
| SAK3 | 10 | 1.5 | 3 | - | 2.73 |
| SAK4 | 10 | 1.5 | 4 | - | 3.00 |
| SAH1 | 10 | 1.5 | - | 1 | 2.17 |
| SAH2 | 10 | 1.5 | - | 2 | 2.60 |
| SAH3 | 10 | 1.5 | - | 3 | 2.57 |
| SAH4 | 10 | 1.5 | - | 4 | 2.78 |
Characteristics of starch–alginate beads.
| Sample | Bead Diameter | Entrapment Efficiency of Spores (%) | Entrapment Efficiency of Metalaxyl (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SA | 1.95 ± 0.10 | 61.75 ± 1.25 | 79.57 ± 1.66 |
| SAK1 | 2.02 ± 0.06 a,* | 48.56 ± 2.33 c | 86.63 ± 1.78 a |
| SAK2 | 2.03 ± 0.08 a | 63.17 ± 0.84 a | 76.39 ± 3.32 b |
| SAK3 | 2.10 ± 0.07 a | 44.31 ± 3.03 c | 74.89 ± 2.85 b |
| SAK4 | 2.10 ± 0.07 a | 56.34 ± 2.64 b | 77.58 ± 1.96 b |
| SAH1 | 2.08 ± 0.07 c | 76.09 ± 1.88 c | 73.34 ± 1.67 b |
| SAH2 | 2.19 ± 0.04 b,c | 84.55 ± 1.56 a | 85.05 ± 3.48 a |
| SAH3 | 2.27 ± 0.06 a,b | 67.40 ± 2.54 b | 64.00 ± 2.59 c |
| SAH4 | 2.37 ± 0.09 a | 83.42 ± 2.48 a | 67.56 ± 2.63 c |
* Mean ± standard deviation with different letters indicates significant differences between formulations using Duncan’s multiple range tests. a, b, c Different letters in the same series indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 1FTIR spectra of starch–alginate based beads: (a) starch-alginate beads (b) starch-alginate-kaolin beads (c) starch-alginate-rice husk powder beads.
Figure 2Scanning electron micrographs of starch-alginate based beads: (a,b) Starch–alginate beads at different magnifications {a × 40; b × 1000}. (c,d) Starch–alginate–kaolin beads at different magnifications {c × 50; d × 1000}. (e,f) Starch–alginate–rice husk powder beads at different magnifications {e × 40; f × 1000}.
Figure 3Thermogram of starch–alginate based beads: (a) starch-alginate beads (b) starch-alginate-kaolin beads (c) starch-alginate-rice husk powder beads.
Figure 4Swelling ratio of beads with different formulations in PBS at 30 °C.
Figure 5Frequency dependence of storage modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G″) of beads: (a) with different kaolin contents (b) with different rice husk powder contents (c) with different formulations.
Figure 6Cumulative release of spores from starch–alginate based beads: (a) With different formulations (b) With different kaolin contents (c) With different rice husk powder contents.
Figure 7Cumulative release of metalaxyl from starch–alginate based beads: (a) With different formulations (b) With different kaolin contents (c) With different rice husk powder contents.
Diffusion constants and mechanism involved in the release process of spores from different formulations of beads.
| Formulation | Equation | n | K | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA | Y = 0.2395X − 1.4731 | 0.24 | 0.23 | Normal Fickian |
| SAK1 | Y = 0.2468X − 1.5782 | 0.25 | 0.21 | Normal Fickian |
| SAK2 | Y = 0.2000X − 1.4683 | 0.20 | 0.23 | Normal Fickian |
| SAK3 | Y = 0.1904X − 1.4312 | 0.19 | 0.24 | Normal Fickian |
| SAK4 | Y = 0.2121X − 1.6105 | 0.21 | 0.20 | Normal Fickian |
| SAH1 | Y = 0.3075X − 1.9013 | 0.30 | 0.15 | Normal Fickian |
| SAH2 | Y = 0.2247X − 1.5118 | 0.22 | 0.22 | Normal Fickian |
| SAH3 | Y = 0.2146X − 1.4968 | 0.21 | 0.22 | Normal Fickian |
| SAH4 | Y = 0.1512X − 1.2319 | 0.15 | 0.29 | Normal Fickian |
n—diffusion exponent, k—diffusion characteristic constant.
Diffusion constants and mechanism involved in the release process of metalaxyl from different formulations of beads.
| Formulation | Equation | n | K (×10−3) | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA | Y = 0.9011X − 5.4281 | 0.90 | 4.39 | Non-Fickian |
| SAK1 | Y = 0.8969X − 5.4140 | 0.89 | 4.45 | Non-Fickian |
| SAK2 | Y = 0.9027X − 5.1622 | 0.90 | 5.73 | Non-Fickian |
| SAK3 | Y = 1.0009X − 5.9081 | 1.00 | 2.72 | Case II |
| SAK4 | Y = 1.1495X − 6.7615 | 1.15 | 1.16 | Case II |
| SAH1 | Y = 0.8603X − 4.6581 | 0.86 | 9.48 | Non-Fickian |
| SAH2 | Y = 0.3416X − 2.3020 | 0.34 | 100.04 | Normal Fickian |
| SAH3 | Y = 1.0525X − 5.7209 | 1.05 | 3.28 | Case II |
| SAH4 | Y = 1.0473X − 6.0509 | 1.05 | 2.36 | Case II |
n—diffusion exponent, k—diffusion characteristic constant.