| Literature DB >> 31091759 |
Zhichao Li1, Jilin Huang2, Zhiping Hu3.
Abstract
Chronic pharyngitis is a common disease, which has a long duration and a wide range of onset. It is easy to misdiagnose by mistaking it with other diseases, such as chronic tonsillitis, by using common diagnostic methods. In order to reduce costs and avoid misdiagnosis, the search for an affordable and rapid diagnostic method is becoming more and more important for chronic pharyngitis research. Speech disorder is one of the typical symptoms of patients with chronic pharyngitis. This paper introduces a convolutional neural network model for diagnosis based on the typical symptom of speech disorder. First of all, the voice data is converted into a speech spectrogram, which can better output the speech characteristic information and lay a foundation for computer diagnosis and discrimination. Second, we construct a deep convolutional neural network for the diagnosis of chronic pharyngitis through the design of the structure, the design of the network layer, and the description of the function. Finally, we perform a parameter optimization experiment on the convolutional neural network and judge the recognition efficiency of chronic pharyngitis. The results show that the convolutional neural network has a high recognition rate for patients with chronic pharyngitis and has a good diagnostic effect.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic pharyngitis; Convolutional neural network; Deep learning; Spectrogram
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31091759 PMCID: PMC6572379 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16101688
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Topology of Neural Networks.
Figure 2Convolutional neural network (NN) structure. C is convolution and S is down-sampling.
Figure 3Convolution (COV) and down-sampling operations.
Figure 4Comparison of the spectrum of patients with chronic pharyngitis and normal people.
Figure 5Long short-term memory neural network (LSTM).
Figure 6The binarized long short-term memory neural network.
Figure 7The structure of Deep Belief Networks (DBNs).
Comparative experiment of different learning rates.
| Learning Rate/Number of Iterations | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 250 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0001 | 63.72% | 65.96% | 72.19% | 72.41% | 72.86% |
| 0.001 | 68.18% | 69.44% | 69.79% | 69.79% | 69.79% |
| 0.01 | 72.59% | 82.57% | 82.73% | 82.91% | 82.94% |
| 0.1 | 37.21% | 45.63% | 48.39% | 51.06% | 51.06% |
| 0.5 | 21.54% | 22.82% | 23.77% | 23.77% | 23.76% |
Figure 8Recognition rate under different output nodes.
Recognition rate under different momentum values.
| Momentum Value | Recognition Rate |
|---|---|
| 0.55 | 0.59 |
| 0.75 | 0.67 |
| 0.95 | 0.89 |
| 1.35 | 0.73 |
Comparison of different algorithms for chronic pharyngitis.
| Algorithm | Recognition Rate |
|---|---|
| DBN | 69.3% |
| RNN | 74.7% |
| CNN (AlexNet) | 81.2% |
| CNN (SqueezeNet) | 80.7% |