Literature DB >> 31091132

Perceived Gaps in Genetics Training Among Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists: Lessons From a National Survey.

Beate Peter1,2, Michael J Dougherty3,4, E Kate Reed5, Emily Edelman5, Karen Hanson3.   

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to assess knowledge, self-rated confidence, and perceived relevance of genetics in the clinical practice of audiologists and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) toward a better understanding of the need for genetics education, given that genetics plays a growing role in the diagnosis of hearing impairment and communication disorders. Method A survey consisting of 8 demographic items and 16 content questions was returned by 233 audiologists and 283 SLPs. Knowledge of applied genetics was queried with clinical scenarios in a multiple-choice format. Self-assessment of clinical confidence and perceived relevance of genetics in one's field was queried with questions and statements rated on 5-point Likert scales. The benefit of additional training in genetics was rated with a yes/no question, and if answered with yes, suggested topics were entered. Results A large significant gap between confidence in one's own genetics skills and the perceived relevance of genetics was evident, regardless of professional group. Over one third of the audiologists and over two thirds of the SLPs indicated low or somewhat low confidence in their own ability to implement principles of genetics, whereas over two thirds of both groups agreed that genetics is relevant for their field. Regardless of group, confidence scores were significantly and positively associated with relevance scores. Over 80% of respondents in both groups indicated that they would benefit from additional training in genetics. Most commonly suggested topics included genetic causes, general information about genetics, and making referrals. Conclusion Both audiologists and SLPs felt that genetics is relevant for their fields and that additional training in genetics would be beneficial. Future studies should evaluate the effect of genetics training on patient outcomes and the need for incorporating genetics more extensively into audiology and speech-language pathology training programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31091132     DOI: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  3 in total

1.  Translating principles of precision medicine into speech-language pathology: Clinical trial of a proactive speech and language intervention for infants with classic galactosemia.

Authors:  Beate Peter; Jennifer Davis; Lizbeth Finestack; Carol Stoel-Gammon; Mark VanDam; Laurel Bruce; Yookyung Kim; Linda Eng; Sarah Cotter; Emily Landis; Sam Beames; Nancy Scherer; Ina Knerr; Delaney Williams; Claire Schrock; Nancy Potter
Journal:  HGG Adv       Date:  2022-05-20

Review 2.  Tools for standardized data collection: Speech, Language, and Hearing measurement protocols in the PhenX Toolkit.

Authors:  Cynthia C Morton; Mary L Marazita; Beate Peter; Mabel L Rice; Shelly Jo Kraft; Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer; Carey Balaban; Michael Phillips; Jennifer Schoden; Deborah Maiese; Tabitha Hendershot; Carol M Hamilton
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.180

3.  Scoping the Scene: What Do Nurses, Midwives, and Allied Health Professionals Need and Want to Know About Genomics?

Authors:  Mona Saleh; Romy Kerr; Kate Dunlop
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.599

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.