Gavin R McCormack1,2, Jason Cabaj1,3, Heather Orpana4,5, Ryan Lukic1, Anita Blackstaffe1, Suzanne Goopy6, Brent Hagel1,7, Noel Keough2, Ryan Martinson8, Jonathan Chapman9, Celia Lee10, Joyce Tang8, Gabriel Fabreau1. 1. Department of Community Health Science, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 2. Faculty of Environmental Design, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 3. Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada. 4. Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 5. School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 6. Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 7. Department of Paediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary. 8. Stantec, Alberta, Canada. 9. City of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 10. Sustainable Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Despite the accumulating Canadian evidence regarding the relations between urban form and health behaviours, less is known about the associations between urban form and health conditions. Our study aim was to undertake a scoping review to synthesize evidence from quantitative studies that have investigated the relationship between built environment and chronic health conditions, self-reported health and quality of life, and injuries in the Canadian adult population. METHODS: From January to March 2017, we searched 13 databases to identify peer-reviewed quantitative studies from all years that estimated associations between the objectively-measured built environment and health conditions in Canadian adults. Studies under-taken within urban settings only were included. Relevant studies were catalogued and synthesized in relation to their reported study and sample design, and health outcome and built environment features. RESULTS: Fifty-five articles met the inclusion criteria, 52 of which were published after 2008. Most single province studies were undertaken in Ontario (n = 22), Quebec (n = 12), and Alberta (n = 7). Associations between the built environment features and 11 broad health outcomes emerged from the review, including injury (n = 19), weight status (n = 19), cardiovascular disease (n = 5), depression/anxiety (n = 5), diabetes (n = 5), mortality (n = 4), self-rated health (n = 2), chronic conditions (n = 2), metabolic condi-tions (n = 2), quality of life (n = 1), and cancer (n = 1). Consistent evidence for associations between aggregate built environment indicators (e.g., walkability) and diabetes and weight and between connectivity and route features (e.g., transportation route, trails, pathways, sidewalks, street pattern, intersections, route characteristics) and injury were found. Evidence for greenspace, parks and recreation features impacting multiple health outcomes was also found. CONCLUSION: Within the Canadian context, the built environment is associated with a range of chronic health conditions and injury in adults, but the evidence to date has limitations. More research on the built environment and health incorporating rigorous study designs are needed to provide stronger causal evidence to inform policy and practice.
INTRODUCTION: Despite the accumulating Canadian evidence regarding the relations between urban form and health behaviours, less is known about the associations between urban form and health conditions. Our study aim was to undertake a scoping review to synthesize evidence from quantitative studies that have investigated the relationship between built environment and chronic health conditions, self-reported health and quality of life, and injuries in the Canadian adult population. METHODS: From January to March 2017, we searched 13 databases to identify peer-reviewed quantitative studies from all years that estimated associations between the objectively-measured built environment and health conditions in Canadian adults. Studies under-taken within urban settings only were included. Relevant studies were catalogued and synthesized in relation to their reported study and sample design, and health outcome and built environment features. RESULTS: Fifty-five articles met the inclusion criteria, 52 of which were published after 2008. Most single province studies were undertaken in Ontario (n = 22), Quebec (n = 12), and Alberta (n = 7). Associations between the built environment features and 11 broad health outcomes emerged from the review, including injury (n = 19), weight status (n = 19), cardiovascular disease (n = 5), depression/anxiety (n = 5), diabetes (n = 5), mortality (n = 4), self-rated health (n = 2), chronic conditions (n = 2), metabolic condi-tions (n = 2), quality of life (n = 1), and cancer (n = 1). Consistent evidence for associations between aggregate built environment indicators (e.g., walkability) and diabetes and weight and between connectivity and route features (e.g., transportation route, trails, pathways, sidewalks, street pattern, intersections, route characteristics) and injury were found. Evidence for greenspace, parks and recreation features impacting multiple health outcomes was also found. CONCLUSION: Within the Canadian context, the built environment is associated with a range of chronic health conditions and injury in adults, but the evidence to date has limitations. More research on the built environment and health incorporating rigorous study designs are needed to provide stronger causal evidence to inform policy and practice.
Entities:
Keywords:
built environment; disease; health; injury; mental health; neighbourhood
Authors: Andrew C Stevenson; Anne-Sophie Brazeau; Kaberi Dasgupta; Nancy A Ross Journal: Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Irmina Klicnik; Andrew Putman; Dany Doiron; Caroline Barakat; Chris I Ardern; David Rudoler; Shilpa Dogra Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2022-10-11
Authors: Susanna Abraham Cottagiri; Margaret De Groh; Sebastian A Srugo; Ying Jiang; Hayley A Hamilton; Nancy A Ross; Paul J Villeneuve Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2021-01-27
Authors: Gavin R McCormack; Mohammad Javad Koohsari; Jennifer E Vena; Koichiro Oka; Tomoki Nakaya; Jonathan Chapman; Ryan Martinson; Graham Matsalla Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-04-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Daniel Wiese; Antoinette M Stroup; Aniruddha Maiti; Gerald Harris; Shannon M Lynch; Slobodan Vucetic; Victor H Gutierrez-Velez; Kevin A Henry Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Janet N Chu; Alison J Canchola; Theresa H M Keegan; Alyssa Nickell; Ingrid Oakley-Girvan; Ann S Hamilton; Rosa L Yu; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Salma Shariff-Marco Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 4.090
Authors: Stephanie L Orstad; Kristin Szuhany; Kosuke Tamura; Lorna E Thorpe; Melanie Jay Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 3.390