Literature DB >> 31090917

Comparing the relation between ultrasound-estimated fetal weight and birthweight in cohort of small-for-gestational-age fetuses.

Katie Stephens1, Maya Al-Memar1, Suzanne Beattie-Jones1, Mandish Dhanjal1, Stephanie Mappouridou1, Elizabeth Thorne1, Christoph Lees1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) confers a higher perinatal risk of adverse outcomes. Birthweight cannot be accurately measured until delivery, therefore accurate estimated fetal weight (EFW) based on ultrasonography is important in identifying this high-risk population. We aimed to establish the sensitivity of detecting SGA infants antenatally in a unit with a selective third-trimester ultrasound policy and to investigate the association between EFW and birthweight in these babies.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on non-anomalous singleton pregnancies delivered after 36 weeks of gestation where SGA (<10th percentile) was diagnosed at delivery. The EFW at the time of the third-trimester ultrasound scan was recorded using standard Hadlock formulae.
RESULTS: In 2017, there were 8392 non-anomalous singleton pregnancies live born after 36 weeks, excluding late bookers. 797 were live-born SGA <10th percentile for birthweight and 464 <5th percentile, who met our inclusion criteria. The antenatal detection rate of SGA was 19.6% for babies with birthweight <10th percentile and 24.1% <5th percentile. There was a significant correlation between the EFW and birthweight of fetuses undergoing ultrasound assessment within 2 weeks of delivery (P < .001, r = 0.73 (Pearson correlation). For these cases, EFW was greater than the birthweight in 65% of cases. After adjusting all EFWs using the discrepancy between EFW and actual birthweight for those babies born within 48 hours of the scan, the mean difference between the birthweight and adjusted EFW 7 days before delivery was 111 g (95% CI 87-136 g) and at 14 days was 200 g (95% CI 153-248 g). Despite adjusting the EFW, 61/213 cases (28.6%) apparently lost weight between the ultrasound scan and delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: Small-for-gestational-age infants with a birthweight <10th percentile are poorly identified antenatally with little improvement for those <5th percentile. In SGA babies, ultrasound EFW overestimated birthweight. Discrepancies between birthweight and EFW are not explicable only by the limitations of third-trimester sonography, a reduction in fetal weight close to delivery in a proportion of liveborn SGA babies is plausible.
© 2019 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fetal growth; fetal growth restriction; fetal size; in utero compromise; small for gestational age

Year:  2019        PMID: 31090917     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  2 in total

1.  Risk scores for predicting small for gestational age infants in Japan: The TMM birthree cohort study.

Authors:  Noriyuki Iwama; Taku Obara; Mami Ishikuro; Keiko Murakami; Fumihiko Ueno; Aoi Noda; Tomomi Onuma; Fumiko Matsuzaki; Tetsuro Hoshiai; Masatoshi Saito; Hirohito Metoki; Junichi Sugawara; Nobuo Yaegashi; Shinichi Kuriyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Maternal and fetal characteristics to predict c-section delivery: A scoring system for pregnant women.

Authors:  Rima Irwinda; Rabbania Hiksas; Angga Wiratama Lokeswara; Noroyono Wibowo
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.