Literature DB >> 31090819

Sociodemographic and clinical profile of patients with occupational contact dermatitis seen at a work-related dermatology service, 2000 - 2014.

Maria das Graças Mota Melo1, Ana Luiza Castro Fernandes Villarinho1, Iuri da Costa Leite2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Occupational dermatoses are common, especially contact dermatitis. Epidemiological studies on these dermatoses are scarce in Brazil and they are necessary as part of the public policy to protect workers' health.
OBJECTIVES: To identify sociodemographic and clinical profile of patients with occupational contact dermatitis seen between 2000 and 2014 at an occupational dermatology service.
METHODS: It is a cross-sectional and retrospective study, based on information obtained from the service's database.
RESULTS: Of 560 patients with conclusive patch test, 289 (46.9%) presented occupational dermatoses and 213 occupational contact dermatitis with predominance of the allergic type in relation to the irritative type (149:64 respectively). The odds of occupational dermatoses were higher among men and lower among patients aged 50 years or older and with higher level of education. Regarding the possibility of presenting occupational allergic contact dermatitis, only the gender variable was statistically significant. The professions most seen were cleaners, construction workers, painters, mechanics/metallurgists and cooks. The commonest allergens were nickel sulfate, potassium dichromate, cobalt chloride, carba-mix and formaldehyde. STUDY LIMITATIONS: The main limitations of this study are the fact that it was carried out in a tertiary service of occupational dermatoses and the lack of access to some allergens outside the patch test baseline series.
CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to identify the sociodemographic and clinical profile of patients with suspected occupational contact dermatitis seen at the Service, beyond the professional groups and allergens related to a high risk of occupational contact dermatitis in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31090819      PMCID: PMC6486076          DOI: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20197235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  An Bras Dermatol        ISSN: 0365-0596            Impact factor:   1.896


  15 in total

1.  Occupational allergic contact dermatitis is more prevalent than irritant contact dermatitis: a 5-year study.

Authors:  Michael J Kucenic; Donald V Belsito
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Exposure to wet work in working Australians.

Authors:  Tessa G Keegel; Rosemary L Nixon; Anthony D LaMontagne
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 3.  The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis (1990-2007): a systematic review.

Authors:  Tessa Keegel; Mignon Moyle; Shyamali Dharmage; Kathryn Frowen; Rosemary Nixon
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.736

4.  Occupational dermatosis.

Authors:  Alice de Oliveira de Avelar Alchorne; Maurício Mota de Avelar Alchorne; Marzia Macedo Silva
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.896

5.  Hand eczema guidelines based on the Danish guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hand eczema.

Authors:  Torkil Menné; Jeanne D Johansen; Mette Sommerlund; Niels K Veien
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Occupational skin diseases.

Authors:  Thomas L Diepgen
Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 5.584

7.  Frequency of occupational contact dermatitis in an ambulatory of dermatologic allergy.

Authors:  Ida Duarte; Anita Rotter; Rosana Lazzarini
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.896

8.  A survey of exposures related to recognized occupational contact dermatitis in Denmark in 2010.

Authors:  Tanja Korfitsen Carøe; Niels Ebbehøj; Tove Agner
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Surveillance scheme for occupational skin disease in the Saarland, FRG. First report from BKH-S.

Authors:  H Dickel; T Bruckner; C Bernhard-Klimt; T Koch; R Scheidt; T L Diepgen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Pattern of contact sensitization in patients with and without atopic dermatitis in a hospital-based clinical database.

Authors:  Kim Katrine Bjerring Clemmensen; Simon Francis Thomsen; Gregor Borut Ernst Jemec; Tove Agner
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 6.600

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sociodemographic, environmental and labor conditions related to the presence of conjunctivitis and skin irritation in a group of informal street vendors in downtown Medellin, 2015-2019.

Authors:  María Osley Garzón Duque; Sebastián García; Daniel Tamayo; Doris Cardona Arango; Ángela María Segura Cardona; Fabio León Rodríguez Ospina; Catalina Betancur Vasquez; Diego Alejandro Marsiglia
Journal:  Rev Bras Med Trab       Date:  2021-04-30

Review 2.  What Is New in Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Year of the COVID Pandemic?

Authors:  Erica B Lee; Marissa Lobl; Aubree Ford; Vincent DeLeo; Brandon L Adler; Ashley Wysong
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  Contact Dermatitis: Classifications and Management.

Authors:  Yan Li; Linfeng Li
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 8.667

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.