Literature DB >> 31090248

Predicting the impact of single nucleotide variants on splicing via sequence-based deep neural networks and genomic features.

Tatsuhiko Naito1.   

Abstract

Single nucleotide mutations in exonic regions can significantly affect gene function through a disruption of splicing, and various computational methods have been developed to predict the splicing-related effects of a single nucleotide mutation. We implemented a new method using ensemble learning that combines two types of predictive models: (a) base sequence-based deep neural networks (DNNs) and (b) machine learning models based on genomic attributes. This method was applied to the Massively Parallel Splicing Assay challenge of the Fifth Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation, in which challenge participants predicted various experimentally-defined exonic splicing mutations, and achieved a promising result. We successfully revealed that combining different predictive models based upon the stacked generalization method led to significant improvement in prediction performance. In addition, whereas most of the genomic features adopted in constructing machine learning models were previously reported, feature values generated with DSSP, a DNN-based splice site prediction tool, were novel and helpful for the prediction. Learning the sequence patterns associated with normal splicing and the change in splicing site probabilities caused by a mutation was presumed to be helpful in predicting splicing disruption.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAGI; deep neural networks; ensemble learning; single nucleotide variant; splicing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31090248      PMCID: PMC7265986          DOI: 10.1002/humu.23794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  18 in total

1.  Identification and segmentation of myelinated nerve fibers in a cross-sectional optical microscopic image using a deep learning model.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Naito; Yu Nagashima; Kenichiro Taira; Naohiro Uchio; Shoji Tsuji; Jun Shimizu
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Human Splice-Site Prediction with Deep Neural Networks.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Naito
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  DeepBipolar: Identifying genomic mutations for bipolar disorder via deep learning.

Authors:  Laksshman Sundaram; Rajendra Rana Bhat; Vivek Viswanath; Xiaolin Li
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.878

4.  Genomic features defining exonic variants that modulate splicing.

Authors:  Adam Woolfe; James C Mullikin; Laura Elnitski
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 13.583

5.  Characterising and predicting haploinsufficiency in the human genome.

Authors:  Ni Huang; Insuk Lee; Edward M Marcotte; Matthew E Hurles
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD): 2003 update.

Authors:  Peter D Stenson; Edward V Ball; Matthew Mort; Andrew D Phillips; Jacqueline A Shiel; Nick S T Thomas; Shaun Abeysinghe; Michael Krawczak; David N Cooper
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  Maximum entropy modeling of short sequence motifs with applications to RNA splicing signals.

Authors:  Gene Yeo; Christopher B Burge
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.479

8.  MutPred Splice: machine learning-based prediction of exonic variants that disrupt splicing.

Authors:  Matthew Mort; Timothy Sterne-Weiler; Biao Li; Edward V Ball; David N Cooper; Predrag Radivojac; Jeremy R Sanford; Sean D Mooney
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Pathogenic variants that alter protein code often disrupt splicing.

Authors:  Rachel Soemedi; Kamil J Cygan; Christy L Rhine; Jing Wang; Charlston Bulacan; John Yang; Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir; Jamie McDonald; William G Fairbrother
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Human Splicing Finder: an online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals.

Authors:  François-Olivier Desmet; Dalil Hamroun; Marine Lalande; Gwenaëlle Collod-Béroud; Mireille Claustres; Christophe Béroud
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Novel Synonymous Variant of PHEX in a Patient with X-Linked Hypophosphatemia.

Authors:  Xiaosen Ma; Qianqian Pang; Qi Zhang; Yan Jiang; Ou Wang; Mei Li; Xiaoping Xing; Weibo Xia
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Interpretable prioritization of splice variants in diagnostic next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel Danis; Julius O B Jacobsen; Leigh C Carmody; Michael A Gargano; Julie A McMurry; Ayushi Hegde; Melissa A Haendel; Giorgio Valentini; Damian Smedley; Peter N Robinson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A deep learning method for HLA imputation and trans-ethnic MHC fine-mapping of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Naito; Ken Suzuki; Jun Hirata; Yoichiro Kamatani; Koichi Matsuda; Tatsushi Toda; Yukinori Okada
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays.

Authors:  Tabea V Riepe; Mubeen Khan; Susanne Roosing; Frans P M Cremers; Peter A C 't Hoen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.878

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.