Literature DB >> 31089956

ClusterBootstrap: An R package for the analysis of hierarchical data using generalized linear models with the cluster bootstrap.

Mathijs Deen1, Mark de Rooij2.   

Abstract

In the analysis of clustered or hierarchical data, a variety of statistical techniques can be applied. Most of these techniques have assumptions that are crucial to the validity of their outcome. Mixed models rely on the correct specification of the random effects structure. Generalized estimating equations are most efficient when the working correlation form is chosen correctly and are not feasible when the within-subject variable is non-factorial. Assumptions and limitations of another common approach, ANOVA for repeated measurements, are even more worrisome: listwise deletion when data are missing, the sphericity assumption, inability to model an unevenly spaced time variable and time-varying covariates, and the limitation to normally distributed dependent variables. This paper introduces ClusterBootstrap, an R package for the analysis of hierarchical data using generalized linear models with the cluster bootstrap (GLMCB). Being a bootstrap method, the technique is relatively assumption-free, and it has already been shown to be comparable, if not superior, to GEE in its performance. The paper has three goals. First, GLMCB will be introduced. Second, there will be an empirical example, using the ClusterBootstrap package for a Gaussian and a dichotomous dependent variable. Third, GLMCB will be compared to mixed models in a Monte Carlo experiment. Although GLMCB can be applied to a multitude of hierarchical data forms, this paper discusses it in the context of the analysis of repeated measurements or longitudinal data. It will become clear that the GLMCB is a promising alternative to mixed models and the ClusterBootstrap package an easy-to-use R implementation of the technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cluster bootstrap; Clustered data; Generalized linear models; Hierarchical data

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31089956      PMCID: PMC7148287          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01252-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  9 in total

1.  The Consequence of Ignoring a Level of Nesting in Multilevel Analysis.

Authors:  Mirjam Moerbeek
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Design and Analysis of Monte Carlo Experiments: Attacking the Conventional Wisdom.

Authors:  A Skrondal
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  The impact of a misspecified random-effects distribution on the estimation and the performance of inferential procedures in generalized linear mixed models.

Authors:  S Litière; A Alonso; G Molenberghs
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Type I and Type II error under random-effects misspecification in generalized linear mixed models.

Authors:  Saskia Litière; Ariel Alonso; Geert Molenberghs
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  A comparison of statistical methods for clustered data analysis with Gaussian error.

Authors:  Z Feng; D McLerran; J Grizzle
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Generalized estimating equations for ordinal data: a note on working correlation structures.

Authors:  T Lumley
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  On the unnecessary ubiquity of hierarchical linear modeling.

Authors:  Daniel McNeish; Laura M Stapleton; Rebecca D Silverman
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2016-05-05

9.  Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models.

Authors:  Holger Schielzeth; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.671

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and cardiac implantable electronic devices in a county hospital setting: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sara Pichtchoulin; Ingrid Selmeryd; Elisabeth Freyhult; Pär Hedberg; Jonas Selmeryd
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.384

2.  Effectiveness of Continuous Endotracheal Cuff Pressure Control for the Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Respiratory Infections: An Open-Label Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Vu Quoc Dat; Lam Minh Yen; Huynh Thi Loan; Vu Dinh Phu; Nguyen Thien Binh; Ronald B Geskus; Dong Huu Khanh Trinh; Nguyen Thi Hoang Mai; Nguyen Hoan Phu; Nguyen Phu Huong Lan; Tran Phuong Thuy; Nguyen Vu Trung; Nguyen Trung Cap; Dao Tuyet Trinh; Nguyen Thi Hoa; Nguyen Thi Thu Van; Vy Thi Thu Luan; Tran Thi Quynh Nhu; Hoang Bao Long; Nguyen Thi Thanh Ha; Ninh Thi Thanh Van; James Campbell; Ehsan Ahmadnia; Evelyne Kestelyn; Duncan Wyncoll; Guy E Thwaites; Nguyen Van Hao; Le Thanh Chien; Nguyen Van Kinh; Nguyen Van Vinh Chau; H Rogier van Doorn; C Louise Thwaites; Behzad Nadjm
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 20.999

3.  Bias of Two-Level Scalability Coefficients and Their Standard Errors.

Authors:  Letty Koopman; Bonne J H Zijlstra; Mark de Rooij; L Andries van der Ark
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-05-14

4.  Explaining Within- vs Between-Population Variation in Child Anthropometry and Hemoglobin Measures in India: A Multilevel Analysis of the National Family Health Survey 2015-2016.

Authors:  Justin Rodgers; Rockli Kim; S V Subramanian
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.211

5.  Emotion regulation-enhanced group treatment for gambling disorder: a non-randomized pilot trial.

Authors:  Viktor Månsson; Olof Molander; Per Carlbring; Ingvar Rosendahl; Anne H Berman
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Statistical Inferences Using Effect Sizes in Human Endothelial Function Research.

Authors:  Joshua M Cherubini; Maureen J MacDonald
Journal:  Artery Res       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 0.597

7.  Is Continued Improvement After Automated Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Spider Phobia Explained by Subsequent in-vivo Exposure? A First Test of the Lowered Threshold Hypothesis.

Authors:  Philip Lindner; Peter Dafgård; Alexander Miloff; Gerhard Andersson; Lena Reuterskiöld; William Hamilton; Per Carlbring
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Resampling-based methods for biologists.

Authors:  John R Fieberg; Kelsey Vitense; Douglas H Johnson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Modeling Evaluations of Low-Level Sounds in Everyday Situations Using Linear Machine Learning for Variable Selection.

Authors:  Siegbert Versümer; Jochen Steffens; Patrick Blättermann; Jörg Becker-Schweitzer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-23

10.  Assessing the Effects of a Real-Life Contact Intervention on Prejudice Toward LGBT People.

Authors:  Florien M Cramwinckel; Daan T Scheepers; Tom F Wilderjans; Robert-Jan B de Rooij
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-09-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.