| Literature DB >> 31089359 |
Atefeh Safarpour1,2, Marzieh Ebrahimi1, Seyed Abolhassan Shahzadeh Fazeli3,4, Mohammad Ali Amoozegar5.
Abstract
Halophilic archaea are known as the novel producers of natural products and their supernatant metabolites could have cytotoxic effects on cancer cells. In the present study, we screened the anticancer potential of supernatant metabolites from eight native haloarchaeal strains obtained from a culture collection in Iran. Five human cancer cell lines including breast, lung, prostate and also human fibroblast cells as the normal control were used in the present study. Moreover, to evaluate the anti-tumor effect of the selected supernatant, inhibition of sphere formation and tumor development was assessed in-vitro and in-vivo, respectively. Among all strains, supernatant metabolites from Halobacterium salinarum IBRC M10715 had the most potent cytotoxic effect on prostate cancer cell lines (IC50 = 0.5 mg/mL) without any effects on normal cells. It significantly increased both early and late apoptosis (about 11% and 9%, respectively) in the androgen-dependent PC3 cell line, reduced sphere formation ability of DU145 and PC3 cells with down-regulation of SOX2 gene expression. Furthermore, our results revealed that tumors developed in nude mice significantly shrank post intratumor injection of metabolites of the haloarchaeal strain. In conclusion, we suggested here for the first time that supernatant metabolites from Halobacterium salinarum IBRC M10715 could be a novel component against prostate cancer in-vitro and in-vivo with remarkable reduction in stem-like properties of tumor.Entities:
Keywords: Archaea; Halophile; Nude mice; Prostate cancer; Supernatant metabolites
Year: 2019 PMID: 31089359 PMCID: PMC6487416
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Effect of Supernatant Metabolite of selected archaeal strains on the viability of normal and cancer cells
| IBRC No. | Species | HFF-5 | PC3 | DU145 | A549 | MDA- MB-468 | MCF-7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.8 µg/mL | 0.8 µg/mL | ||||||
| IBRC |
| - | 37.7 ± 1.0 | 35.5 ± 1.2 | - | - | - |
|
|
| ||||||
| 0.8 µg/mL | 0.8 µg/mL | ||||||
| IBRC |
| 51.0 ± 2.4 | - | - | - | - | 39.0 ± 4.1 |
|
|
| ||||||
| 0.8 µg/mL | 0.8 µg/mL | ||||||
| IBRC |
| 62.2 ± 0.7 | - | - | - | 60.6 ± 0.4 | - |
|
|
| ||||||
| 0.8 µg/mL | 0.8 µg/mL | ||||||
| IBRC |
| - | 62.2 ± 1.7 | - | 68.5 ± 1.8 | - | - |
|
|
| ||||||
| 0.1 µg/mL | |||||||
| IBRC |
| 70.6 ± 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| |||||||
| 0.4 µg/mL | 0.4 µg/mL | 0.8 µg/mL | |||||
| IBRC |
| 67.8 ± 2.5 | - | - | 66.1 ± 1.5 | - | 60.8 ± 3.8 |
|
|
|
| |||||
| 0.4 µg/mL | |||||||
| IBRC |
| - | - | 60.9 ± 1.2 | - | - | - |
|
| |||||||
| 0.01 µg/mL | |||||||
| IBRC |
| 70.5 ± 0.9 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
|
-: The SM did not reduce the viability of cells significantly in any of examined concentrations. HFF-5: Fibroblast cell line. PC3 and DU145: Prostate cancer cell lines.
A549: Lung cancer cell line. MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7: Breast cancer cell lines.
Data shown as percentage of viability ± SD. p-values showed significance of decrease in viability.
Primer sequences for Real-time PCR
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| 5' GTG GTC TCC TCT GAC TTC AAC 3' | 5' AGG GTC TCT CTC TTC CTC TTG 3' |
|
| 5' CAA GAT GGC CCA GGA GAA C 3' | 5' TCA TGT AGG TCT GCG AGC TG 3' |
|
| 5' AAG CGA ATC AAT GGA CTC TGG 3' | 5' CAA GTT TCT GAA TGT TTC CCT GAG 3' |
Figure 1Dose determination of Halobacterium salinarum Supernatant Metabolite on prostate cancer cell lines (PC3 and DU145) and fibroblast cell line (HFF-5). SM at different concentrations was added to the culture medium of PC3, DU145 and HFF-5. The data represents mean ± SD. p-values showed significance of viability decrease. ***p < 0.001
Figure 2Effect of Halobacterium salinarum IBRC M10715 supernatant metabolite on apoptosis of prostate cancer cell lines (DU145 and PC3). (A) Apoptosis test of Halobacterium salinarum SM on DU145 and PC3 cells was done by annexin-PI staining, two days post treatment. Downright quadrate shows cells in early apoptosis and upright quadrate shows late apoptosis. (B) The comparison of early apoptosis and (C) late apoptosis in both DU145 and PC3 cells post 48 h treatment with 0.5 mg/mL of Halobacterium salinarum SM.
Figure 3The effect of Halobacterium salinarum IBRC M10715 supernatant metabolite on stemness properties of prostate cancer cell lines. (A) 106 cells of treated with 0.5 mg/mL concentration of Halobacterium salinarum SM per T25 flask were subjected to sphere formation in no-adherent conditions. Untreated cells were used as control group. (B) The percentage of spheres pre and post treatment was calculated by dividing the number of spheroids to the number of seeding number of seeding number ´ 100. (C) Size of spheres in pre and post 48 h treatment of PC3 and DU145. (D) The relative expression of SOX2 gene (as pluripotency marker) was assessed by quantitative real-time PCR. The GAPDH was used for normalizing of data. Bars indicated Mean± SD of at least 3 biological replicates, (***p < 0.001).
Figure 4Tumorigenicity of Halobacterium salinarum IBRC M10715 SM treated prostate cancer cells in nude mice. (A) Tumors developed in nude mice 3 days post injection of 3 × 106 DU145 and PC3 cells per 20 μL of matrigel. The Halobacterium salinarum SM was injected intra tumoraly. In control group equal volume of DMSO injected intratumoraly. The tumor volume developed by (B) DU14 and (C) PC3 cells was calculated by measuring length and width for seven days. (D) Immunostaining of Ki67 in control and treated tumors. Yellow arrows indicate brown nuclei of positive cells. (E) The Ki67 positive cells was counted under the light microscope. Bars indicated mean ± SD of at least 10 randomly selected filed from five pictures in each group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001