| Literature DB >> 31089339 |
Sukhbir L Khokra1, Kanika Arora1, Shah A Khan2, Pawan Kaushik1, Reetu Saini1, Asif Husain3.
Abstract
We report herein the synthesis of ¾ substituted benzene sulfonamides linked via phenyl ring to aEntities:
Keywords: Anticonvulsant; Benzenesulfonamide; Benzothiazole; Computational analysis; MES
Year: 2019 PMID: 31089339 PMCID: PMC6487412
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Figure 1Chemical structures of few drugs containing benzothiazole nucleus
Figure 2General chemical structure of title compounds showing essential pharmacophoric features of anticonvulsant agents (A: hydrophobic aryl ring, D: Electron donor atom, HBA; Hydrogn bond acceptor; HBD: Hydrogen bond donor).
Effect of synthesized compounds on maximal electroshock (MES) in mice
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 1 | Control | 5.2 ± 0.58 | 12.6 ± 0.68 | 6.4 ± 0.68 | 12.4 ± 0.51 | 186.2 ± 5.3 |
| 2 | Standard | 3.6 ± 0.68 | 0 | 1.6 ± 0.24 | 1.6 ± 0.24 | 171.8 ± 2.92 |
| 3 | 1 | 3.4 ± 0.51 | 1.8 ± 0.37 | 4.4 ± 0.75 | 15.2 ± 1.07 | 145.2 ± 4.5 |
| 4 | 2 | 2.8 ± 0.37 | 1.6 ± 0.24 | 4.8 ± 0.37 | 16.6 ± 1.36 | 126.8 ± 208 |
| 5 | 3 | 8.4 ± 0.51 | 1.8 ± 0.58 | 5.0 ± 0.71 | 21 ± 2.24 | 131.4 ± 5.15 |
| 6 | 4 | 3.2 ± 0.86 | 1.6 ± 0.40 | 4.2 ± 0.86 | 18 ± 3.56 | 127.8 ± 4.55 |
| 7 | 5 | 4.6 ± 0.51 | 2.4 ± 0.51 | 4.4 ± 0.75 | 18.4 ± 2.06 | 128.6 ± 6.04 |
| 8 | 6 | 2.4 ± 0.51 | 1.8 ± 0.37 | 4.0 ± 0.71 | 17.8 ± 1.86 | 135.6 ± 0.69 |
| 9 | 7 | 2.2 ± 0.37 | 2.4 ± 0.51 | 4.8 ± 0.58 | 18 ± 2.07 | 133.8 ± 8.42 |
| 10 | 8 | 2.2 ± 0.58 | 1.6 ± 0.40 | 4.4 ± 0.51 | 19.8 ± 1.32 | 129.2 ± 3.67 |
| 11 | 9 | 1.8 ± 0.37 | 1.2 ± 0.20 | 3.8 ± 0.8 | 2.4 ± 2.83 | 129 ± 5.32 |
| 12 | 10 | 3.4 ± 0.40 | 1.4 ± 0.20 | 5.2 ± 0.86 | 19.4 ± 2.5 | 135.8 ± 11.2 |
| 13 | 11 | 2.2 ± 0.58 | 1.4 ± 0.40 | 4.8 ± 1.16 | 18 ± 2.07 | 120.4 ± 3.71 |
| 14 | 12 | 2.4 ± 0.74 | 1.6 ± 0.60 | 4.0 ± 0.70 | 17.8 ± 2.40 | 132.6 ± 3.01 |
| 15 | 13 | 2.2 ± 0.73 | 2.0 ± 0.77 | 5.0 ± 0.86 | 17.6 ± 3.31 | 128.8 ± 6.09 |
| 16 | 14 | 2.6 ± 0.4 | 1.8 ± 0.58 | 5.0 ± 1.14 | 15.8 ± 1.99 | 130.2 ± 3.65* |
The data were analysed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test,
p > 0.01 compared to control group.
Scheme 1Synthesis of N-[(4-benzothiazole-2-yl) phenyl] ¾ substituted benzenesulfonamides
Effect of synthesized compounds on PTZ test in mice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control | 3.6 ± 0.51 | 10.8 ± 0.73 | 5/5 |
| 2 | Standard | 0 | 0 | 0/5 |
| 3 | 1 | 3.8 ± 0.37 | 10.6 ± 1.21 | 5/5 |
| 4 | 2 | 3.6 ± 0.81 | 13.0 ± 1.58 | 5/5 |
| 5 | 3 | 3.2 ± 0.37 | 12.6 ± 0.93 | 5/5 |
| 6 | 4 | 3.0 ± 0.32 | 12.8 ± 0.86 | 5/5 |
| 7 | 5 | 3.2 ± 0.58 | 17.6 ± 2.44 | 5/5 |
| 8 | 6 | 3.0 ± 0.71 | 19.0 ± 2.97 | 5/5 |
| 9 | 7 | 3.0 ± 1.05 | 16.6 ± 1.63 | 5/5 |
| 10 | 8 | 1.8 ± 0.37 | 16.6 ± 3.75 | 5/5 |
| 11 | 9 | 2.2 ± 0.49 | 18.4 ± 1.63 | 5/5 |
| 12 | 10 | 2.4 ± 0.75 | 13.4 ± 1.33 | 5/5 |
| 13 | 11 | 3.8 ± 0.49 | 14.6 ± 1.97 | 5/5 |
| 14 | 12 | 3.8 ± 0.58 | 13.6 ± 1.36 | 5/5 |
| 15 | 13 | 3.4 ± 1.03 | 14.6 ± 1.97 | 5/5 |
| 16 | 14 | 3.0 ± 0.77 | 15.0 ± 1.55 | 5/5 |
The data were analysed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test,
p > 0.01 compared to control group.
Figure 3Binding mode of compounds (1-4) in to nicotinic acetylcholine ion gated receptors. Hydrogen bonds are shown with blue dotted lines
Figure 6Binding mode of compounds (13-14) in to nicotinic acetylcholine ion gated receptors. Hydrogen bonds are shown with blue dotted lines
Compounds showing interactions between synthesized compounds and amino acids residues with different potency (PDB ID: 2BG9)
| S. No. | Structure | Mol Dock Score | Docking Score | H-bonds | H-bonds distance (Å) | Interacting Residue | Interacting Molecule |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| EPS_1050 [A] | -116.65 | -113.74 | 3 | 2.60, | Arg 277, | O of SO2-N, |
|
| H | -106.33 | -107.38 | 2 | 2.85, | Arg 277, | O of SO2-N, |
|
| Cl | -110.31 | -110.90 | 2 | 2.90, | Arg 277, | O of SO2-N, |
|
| Br | -111.83 | -112.06 | 2 | 3.10, | Arg 277, | O of SO2-N, |
|
| F | -107.09 | -107.16 | 2 | 2.72, | Arg 277, | O of SO2-N, |
|
| CH3 | -110.72 | -111.97 | 2 | 2.60, | Arg 277, | O of SO2-N, |
|
| NO2 | -114.67 | -118.59 | 3 | 3.88, | Arg 277, | N of NO2-N, |
|
| Br, CH3 | -112.39 | -113.68 | 2 | 2.81, | Glu 262, | N of NH-O, |
|
| H | -104.49 | -104.69 | 2 | 2.60, | Arg 277, Arg 277 | O of SO2-N, |
|
| Cl | -104.72 | -109.47 | 3 | 3.21, | Gln 276, | O of SO2-N, |
|
| Br | -103.75 | 106.22 | 3 | 3.37, | Tyr 223, | N of NH-O, |
|
| F | -113.84 | -112.07 | 3 | 3.14, | Arg 277, | O of SO2-N, |
|
| CH3 | -107.75 | -106.90 | 1 | 2.92 | Glu 262 | N of thiazole-O |
|
| NO2 | -115.37 | -120.35 | 5 | 3.29, | Arg 277, | N of NO2-N, |
|
| CH3,Br | -110.09 | -110.29 | 1 | 3.50 | Glu 274 | O of SO2-O |
Percentage inhibition in extensor phase
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control | 0 |
| 2 | Standard | 98.41 |
| 3 | 1 | 85.71 |
| 4 | 2 | 87.30 |
| 5 | 3 | 85.71 |
| 6 | 4 | 87.30 |
| 7 | 5 | 80.95 |
| 8 | 6 | 85.71 |
| 9 | 7 | 80.95 |
| 10 | 8 | 87.30 |
| 11 | 9 | 90.47 |
| 12 | 10 | 88.88 |
| 13 | 11 | 88.88 |
| 14 | 12 | 87.30 |
| 15 | 13 | 84.12 |
| 16 | 14 | 85.71 |