| Literature DB >> 31089159 |
Chikara Sato1, Daiju Yamazaki2, Mari Sato3, Hiroshi Takeshima2, Nassirhadjy Memtily3,4, Yuri Hatano3, Takayuki Tsukuba5, Eiko Sakai5.
Abstract
The malformation and disordered remodeling of bones induce various diseases, includingEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31089159 PMCID: PMC6517404 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43608-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1ASEM of unstained osteoblast primary culture or bone tissue immersed in aqueous liquid. (a) ASEM system used to image unstained osteoblasts or bone tissues. Tissue or cultured cells were aldehyde fixed and observed in radical scavenger glucose solution. In the ASEM system, an OM is positioned above an inverted SEM, with the specimen dish in between. The removable, 35-mm ASEM specimen dish is open to the atmosphere and has eight SiN windows in its bottom plate. The base of the ASEM dish seals the microscope chamber and separates the sample immersed in aqueous solution from the microscope vacuum. Each window is a 100 nm-thick SiN film (0.25 × 0.25 mm). Osteoblasts were cultured on the dish, fixed with GA and directly observed in solution. Fixed tissues were excised from the organ and placed on the dish with the excised face down, i.e., in contact with the SiN membrane. The electron beam projects from underneath onto the fixed cells or tissues through the SiN film, and backscattered electrons are detected by the BEI detector of the ASEM, allowing high resolution imaging. (b–d) Osteoblast culture observed over time by ASEM. (b) Day (DID) 5 after induction of differentiation, very small bright signals start to appear, indicating that electron-dense sedimentations begin to emerge. The contrast and brightness are adjusted in the enlarged subpanel in the top. (c) DID8; bright spots appear, forming cell shapes (arrow) surrounded by fine dots (arrowhead). (d) DID10; the number of bright spots increases as the culture proceeds. Scale bars: 50 μm.
Figure 2Element analysis of the electron dense signals. After ASEM imaging of GA-fixed osteoblast culture (DID10) in solution, the culture on the ASEM dish was progressively dehydrated using ethanol, dried, and placed in the vacuum chamber of an EDS FE-SEM. (a) ASEM image of GA-fixed ostoblast cells in solution. The indicated areas were examined from the top of the dish by EDS. (a1–a6) Typical EDS spectra recorded from the white square areas indicated in a. The major mineral components of bone, Ca, P and O, are more abundant in brighter areas of the ASEM image, suggesting that the BEI signals represent CaP mineral formation. A large amount of Si was always detected, reflecting the SiN film window underneath the cells. (b,c) Ca and P element distributions mapped using EDS. Both maps resemble the distribution of the electron-dense signals registered by ASEM (panel a).
Figure 3Inorganic crystal formation in crystallization chamber imaged by ASEM. Crystals were inorganically formed by merging 0.2 M CaCl2 and 0.2 M PB (pH 7.4) solutions in a microfluidics chamber on the ASEM dish. (a) Microfluidics chamber designed to observe CaP crystal formation. (b) CaP crystals and ACP formed between CaCl2 and PB (pH7.4) solutions in the chamber. (c) Higher magnification image of the square in (b). (d,e) Crystals and ACP in a bulk mixture of CaCl2 and phosphate buffer. A bulk mixture of 2.5 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM PB (pH7.4) was incubated for 5 days, and centrifuged quickly. The precipitate was resuspended in a small aliquot of the supernatant solution, placed on the ASEM dish, and observed by ASEM. (d) Low magnification image of a window. (e) Higher magnification image of the square in (d).
Figure 4Structures surrounding mineralization in osteoblast primary culture visualized by metal staining. (a) Mineralization imaged without staining using ASEM. (b) The same region counter stained by the NCMIR method to reveal surrounding structures[29,44]. Osteoblast cells extending filopodia are clearly visible. Their nucleus (*) is imaged in bright shades. The mineralization is also clearly visible as bright spots (arrows). The very bright spots that appeared on counter staining might be oil droplets (arrowheads). (c) Overlay image of (b) and red-colored (a). The mineralized spots are imaged red. (d) Cell-dense area stained by the NCMIR method. (e) Higher magnification image of the square in d. (f) Another area stained by the NCMIR method. (g) PTA-stained cell-dense area. (h,i) Higher magnification images of the squares in g. Filamentous structures (open arrow) were imaged outside the osteoblasts. Their nucleus (*) sometimes included the clear nucleoli (open arrowheads).
Figure 5Spongy bone of talus imaged with and without PTA staining by ASEM. Talus was fixed with GA, isolated, sliced into 200 μm thick slabs, and directly imaged in glucose buffer by ASEM. (a) Collage of low magnification images of a slab region before (bottom right) and after PTA staining (left and top right). The white rectangle marks a trabecula with high electron density (white arrow). (b) Higher magnification images of the white square in (a) before (right) and after PTA staining (left). Larger cells attached to the trabecula that were hardly visible before staining, might be osteoclasts (white arrowheads). In contrast, smaller cells that were only faintly visible before staining, might be osteoblasts (black arrowheads). The abundant filaments (open arrow) of trabecula might be collagen 1 fibers. Both panels are a collage of images.
Figure 6Another spongy bone in talus stained with PTA and imaged by ASEM. Another area of trabecula bone imaged using ASEM. (a) Low magnification image collage showing the bone after PTA staining (left). Trabecula is indicated by an open arrowhead. (b) Higher magnification image of the indicated area in the left panel. A bright trabecula with many holes has cells that are larger than 10 μm attached to it. These might be osteoclasts (arrowheads).
Figure 7Cortical bone of tibia stained with PTA and imaged with ASEM. Tibia was stained with PTA and the cortical bone near the joint connecting the tibia to the femur was imaged using ASEM. Bone runs diagonally in the micrographs; the region closest to the joint is top left and the region furthest from the joint is bottom right. (a) Low magnification. (b,c) Higher magnification of the annotated squares in panel (a). The images reveal cortical bone layer (white arrowhead) lined on the inner side by many chamber-like structures isolated by homogeneous bright partitions (black arrowhead). (c) Some cells close to the outer side of the cortical bone have thin connections to the bone (arrow).
Figure 8Distribution of cathepsin K in femur spongy bone in solution using immuno-gold labeling and ASEM. Femur thick slabs were labeled with anti-cathepsin K antibody and further with secondary antibody conjugated with FluoroNanogold, gold-enhanced, and then counter-stained with PTA. (a) ASEM image of spongy bone. Trabeculae are clearly observed. (b–f) Higher magnification of the annotated white rectangles indicated in the preceding panels. (c) A cathepsin K positive cell attached to a thin trabecula. Gold signals are observed as strong bright dots. (d) Another area in (a) was observed at higher magnification. Trabeculae are surrounded by many cells of various shape. (e,f) Higher magnification images of the annotated rectangles in (d). (c,e) A cathepsin K positive cell (arrowheads) that covers a pit of thin trabeculae. In both cases, many substances that were probably digested or secreted by the cell were observed between the cell and the trabecula (c,e). Gold signals also observed on the trabeculae (arrow) might correspond to cathepsin K secreted from osteoclast cell. (f) Cathepsin K positive cells attached to trabeculae.