| Literature DB >> 31088409 |
Zaiping Chen1, Guiyang Wu1, Fubo Ye1, Guoping Chen1, Qinghao Fan1, Hao Dong1, Xiongwen Zhu2, Chongshan Wu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Matrix metalloproteinase 19 (MMP19) is a member of zinc-dependent endopeptidases, which have been involved in various physiological and pathological processes. Its expression has been demonstrated in some types of cancers, but the clinical significance of MMP19 in colorectal cancer (CRC) has not been reported. Thus, we aimed to analyze the clinical significance of MMP19 in CRC in present study.Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; MMP19; Survival analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31088409 PMCID: PMC6518766 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5673-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses of MMP19 expression and overall survival for patients with colorectal cancer in the The Cancer Genome Atlas database
| Factor | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Gender | 0.793(0.509–1.234) | 0.303 | NI | |
| Age | 1.029(1.010–1.084) |
| 1.037(1.017–1.056) |
|
| T category | 2.680(1.694–4.242) |
| 2.045(1.260–3.320) |
|
| N stage | 1.759(1.371–2.256) |
| 1.573(1.199–2.064) |
|
| M stage | 1.378(1.069–1.778) |
| 1.092(0.829–1.440) | 0.532 |
| Tumor location | 0.777(0.442–1.364) | 0.379 | ||
| MMP19 | 1.449(1.108–1.893) |
| 1.401(1.036–1.894) |
|
Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, MMP19 matrix metalloproteinase 19, T tumor, N node, M metastasis
Bold type indicates statistical significance
Fig. 1X-tile analyses of 5-year overall survival (OS) were performed using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas to determine the optimal cut-off values for the matrix metalloproteinase 19 (MMP19) mRNA levels. The sample of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients was equally divided into training and validation cohorts. a X-tile plots of the training sets are shown in the left panels, with plots of matched validation cohort shown in the smaller inset. b Optimal cut-off values highlighted by the black circles in the left panels are shown in histograms of the entire cohort (middle panels); 167 patients in the MMP19 low expression group, while 192 were in the high expression group, and (c) Kaplan–Meier plots are displayed in the right panels, χ = 12.602,P < 0.001
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses of MMP19 expression and relapse free survival for patients with colon cancer in the GSE39582 database
| Factor | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Gender | 0.744(0.528–1.048) | 0.090 | ||
| Age | 1.008(0.995–1.021) | 0.233 | ||
| T category | 1.916(1.381–2.659) |
| 1.774(1.274–2.468) |
|
| N stage | 1.795(1.451–2.222) |
| 1.669(1.343–2.073) |
|
| Tumor location | 1.144(0.810–1.619) | 0.446 | ||
| MMP19 | 2.061(1.454–2.921) |
| 1.470(1.025–2.215) |
|
Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, MMP19 matrix metalloproteinase 19, T tumor, N node, M metastasis
Bold type indicates statistical significance
Fig. 2X-tile analyses of 5-year relapse-free survival were performed using data from the GSE39582 cohort to determine the optimal cut-off values for the MMP19 mRNA levels. a X-tile plots of the training cohort are shown in the left panels, with plots of the matched validation cohort shown in the smaller inset. b The optimal cut-off values highlighted by the black circles in the left panels are shown in histograms of the entire cohort (middle panels); 145 patients were in the MMP19 low expression group, while 351 were in the high expression group, and (c) Kaplan–Meier plots are displayed in right panels, χ = 14.070,P < 0.001
Fig. 3MMP19 expression pattern in CRC. a MMP19 expression was significantly higher in cancer tissues than in the normal controls in 198 paired tissues (P < 0.001).b, c Representative images of low(b) and high(c) MMP19 expression in CRC determined by IHC staining. d MMP19 mRNA expression is highly correlated with their protein levels (P < 0.001)
Association between MMP19 expression and clinicopathological factors in colorectal cancer
| Characteristics | Total | MMP19 expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low expression | High expression | |||
| Gender | 0.144 | |||
| Male | 122 | 56(56.6) | 66(66.7) | |
| Female | 76 | 43(43.4) | 33(33.3) | |
| Age | 0.190 | |||
| ≥ 60 | 121 | 65(65.7) | 56(56.6) | |
| <60 | 77 | 34(34.3) | 43(43.4) | |
| Primary site | 0.776 | |||
| colon | 92 | 45(45.5) | 47(47.5) | |
| rectum | 106 | 54(54.5) | 52(52.5) | |
| Histologic type | 0.756 | |||
| Adenocarcinoma | 187 | 94(94.9) | 93(93.9) | |
| Mucinous adenocarcinoma | 11 | 5(5.1) | 6(6.1) | |
| Histologic grade | 0.177 | |||
| Well | 54 | 24(24.2) | 30(30.3) | |
| Moderate | 99 | 56(56.6) | 43(43.4) | |
| Poor | 45 | 19(19.2) | 26(26.3) | |
| T stage | 0.052 | |||
| T2 | 17 | 10(10.1) | 7(7.1) | |
| T3 | 72 | 43(43.4) | 29(29.3) | |
| T4 | 109 | 46(46.5) | 63(63.6) | |
| Node status |
| |||
| Negative | 79 | 47(47.5) | 32(32.3) | |
| Positive | 119 | 52(52.5) | 67(67.7) | |
| Intramural vascular invasion |
| |||
| Negative | 156 | 85(85.9) | 71(71.7) | |
| Positive | 42 | 14(14.1) | 28(28.3) | |
| Perineural invasion | 0.692 | |||
| Negative | 168 | 85(85.9) | 83(83.8) | |
| Positive | 30 | 14(14.1) | 16(16.2) | |
| CEA status |
| |||
| normal | 137 | 75(75.8) | 62(62.6) | |
| high | 61 | 24(24.2) | 37(37.4) | |
Abbreviations: CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, MMP19 matrix metalloproteinase 19, T tumor, N node, M metastasis
Bold type indicates statistical significance
Fig. 4Survival analysis of CRC in the validation cohort according to MMP19 expression levels. High MMP19 expression indicates shorter (a) disease free survival (χ = 29.516, P < 0.001) and (b) OS (χ = 26.103, P < 0.001)
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses of MMP19 expression and disease free survival for patients with colorectal cancer in the validation cohort
| Factor | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Gender | 0.924(0.541–1.578) | 0.772 | ||
| Age | 1.327(0.790–2.227) | 0.285 | ||
| T category | 2.044(1.263–3.307) |
| 1.527(0.972–2.400) | 0.066 |
| N stage | 1.784 (1.285–2.457) |
| 1.642(1.140–2.365) |
|
| Tumor location | 0.902(0.539–1.509) | 0.694 | ||
| Histologic type | 0.900(0.282–2.878) | 0.860 | ||
| Grade | 1.200(0.831-1.733) | 0.330 | ||
| Intramural vascular invasion | 2.190(1.264–3.796) |
| 1.337(0.754–2.371) | 0.321 |
| Perineural invasion | 1.965(1.076–3.588) |
| 1.393(0.738–2.628) | 0.306 |
| MMP19 | 4.909(2.598–9.275) |
| 4.699(2.461–8.974) |
|
Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, MMP19 matrix metalloproteinase 19, T tumor, N node
Bold type indicates statistical significance
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses of MMP19 expression and overall survival for patients with colorectal cancer in the validation cohort
| Factor | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Gender | 1.000(0.547–1.827) | 0.999 | ||
| Age | 1.416(0.788–2.543) | 0.245 | ||
| T category | 2.542(1.396–4.628) |
| 1.854(1.054–3.260) |
|
| N stage | 1.975 (1.354–2.881) |
| 1.856(1.226–2.810) |
|
| Tumor location | 0.808(0.450–1.450) | 0.475 | ||
| Histologic type | 1.206(0.374–3.893) | 0.754 | ||
| Grade | 1.155(0.762-1.751) | 0.496 | ||
| Intramural vascular invasion | 2.419(1.312–4.458) |
| 0.927(0.435–1.975) | 0.210 |
| Perineural invasion | 1.412(0.680–2.932) | 0.355 | ||
| MMP19 | 5.807(2.702–12.483) |
| 5.595(2.573–12.164) |
|
Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, MMP19 matrix metalloproteinase 19, T tumor, N node
Bold type indicates statistical significance