Literature DB >> 31087609

Hippocampal transcriptomic responses to enzyme-mediated cellular dissociation.

Rayna M Harris1,2, Hsin-Yi Kao2,3, Juan Marcos Alarcon2,4,5, Hans A Hofmann1,2, André A Fenton2,3,5,6,7.   

Abstract

Single-neuron gene expression studies may be especially important for understanding nervous system structure and function because of the neuron-specific functionality and plasticity that defines functional neural circuits. Cellular dissociation is a prerequisite technical manipulation for single-cell and single cell-population studies, but the extent to which the cellular dissociation process affects neural gene expression has not been determined. This information is necessary for interpreting the results of experimental manipulations that affect neural function such as learning and memory. The goal of this research was to determine the impact of cellular dissociation on brain transcriptomes. We compared gene expression of microdissected samples from the dentate gyrus (DG), CA3, and CA1 subfields of the mouse hippocampus either prepared by a standard tissue homogenization protocol or subjected to enzymatic digestion used to dissociate cells within tissues. We report that compared to homogenization, enzymatic dissociation alters about 350 genes or 2% of the hippocampal transcriptome. While only a few genes canonically implicated in long-term potentiation and fear memory change expression levels in response to the dissociation procedure, these data indicate that sample preparation can affect gene expression profiles, which might confound interpretation of results depending on the research question. This study is important for the investigation of any complex tissues as research effort moves from subfield level analysis to single cell analysis of gene expression.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genomics; hippocampus; reproducible research; transcriptomics

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31087609      PMCID: PMC6692227          DOI: 10.1002/hipo.23095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  36 in total

Review 1.  Can molecules explain long-term potentiation?

Authors:  J R Sanes; J W Lichtman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Defining a molecular atlas of the hippocampus using DNA microarrays and high-throughput in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Ed S Lein; Xinyu Zhao; Fred H Gage
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Sublayer-Specific Coding Dynamics during Spatial Navigation and Learning in Hippocampal Area CA1.

Authors:  Nathan B Danielson; Jeffrey D Zaremba; Patrick Kaifosh; John Bowler; Max Ladow; Attila Losonczy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Creating a false memory in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Steve Ramirez; Xu Liu; Pei-Ann Lin; Junghyup Suh; Michele Pignatelli; Roger L Redondo; Tomás J Ryan; Susumu Tonegawa
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Multiple repressive mechanisms in the hippocampus during memory formation.

Authors:  Jun Cho; Nam-Kyung Yu; Jun-Hyeok Choi; Su-Eon Sim; SukJae Joshua Kang; Chuljung Kwak; Seung-Woo Lee; Ji-il Kim; Dong Il Choi; V Narry Kim; Bong-Kiun Kaang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  BioJupies: Automated Generation of Interactive Notebooks for RNA-Seq Data Analysis in the Cloud.

Authors:  Denis Torre; Alexander Lachmann; Avi Ma'ayan
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 10.304

7.  Hippocampal memory traces are differentially modulated by experience, time, and adult neurogenesis.

Authors:  Christine A Denny; Mazen A Kheirbek; Eva L Alba; Kenji F Tanaka; Rebecca A Brachman; Kimberly B Laughman; Nicole K Tomm; Gergely F Turi; Attila Losonczy; René Hen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Effect of enzymatic and mechanical methods of dissociation on neural progenitor cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Lindsey D Jager; Claire-Marie A Canda; Crystal A Hall; Cassandra L Heilingoetter; Joann Huynh; Susanna S Kwok; Jin H Kwon; Jacob R Richie; Matthew B Jensen
Journal:  Adv Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.287

9.  Regulation of cell-type-specific transcriptomes by microRNA networks during human brain development.

Authors:  Tomasz J Nowakowski; Neha Rani; Mahdi Golkaram; Hongjun R Zhou; Beatriz Alvarado; Kylie Huch; Jay A West; Anne Leyrat; Alex A Pollen; Arnold R Kriegstein; Linda R Petzold; Kenneth S Kosik
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 28.771

10.  Simultaneous single-cell profiling of lineages and cell types in the vertebrate brain.

Authors:  Bushra Raj; Daniel E Wagner; Aaron McKenna; Shristi Pandey; Allon M Klein; Jay Shendure; James A Gagnon; Alexander F Schier
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  2 in total

1.  Molecular profiling of single neurons of known identity in two ganglia from the crab Cancer borealis.

Authors:  Adam J Northcutt; Daniel R Kick; Adriane G Otopalik; Benjamin M Goetz; Rayna M Harris; Joseph M Santin; Hans A Hofmann; Eve Marder; David J Schulz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Single-cell transcriptome profiling of an adult human cell atlas of 15 major organs.

Authors:  Shuai He; Lin-He Wang; Yang Liu; Yi-Qi Li; Hai-Tian Chen; Jing-Hong Xu; Wan Peng; Guo-Wang Lin; Pan-Pan Wei; Bo Li; Xiaojun Xia; Dan Wang; Jin-Xin Bei; Xiaoshun He; Zhiyong Guo
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 13.583

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.