| Literature DB >> 31087530 |
Sechang Oh1,2, Natsumi Oshida1,3, Noriko Someya3, Tsuyoshi Maruyama4, Tomonori Isobe2,5, Yoshikazu Okamoto2,5, Taeho Kim1, Bokun Kim6, Junichi Shoda1,2.
Abstract
Physical exercise has demonstrated benefits for managing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, in daily life maintaining exercise without help may be difficult. A whole-body vibration device (WBV) has been recently introduced as an exercise modality that may be suitable for patients who have difficulty engaging in exercise. We tested WBV in patients with NAFLD and estimated its effectiveness. We studied the effects of a 6-month WBV program on hepatic steatosis and its underlying pathophysiology in 25 patients with NAFLD. Seventeen patients with NAFLD were designated as a control group. After WBV exercise, body weight in the study group decreased by only 2.5% compared with the control group. However, we found significant increases in muscle area (+2.6%) and strength (+20.5%) and decreases in fat mass (-6.8%). The hepatic (-9.9%) and visceral (-6.2%) fat content also significantly decreased (P < 0.05). There was substantial lowering of hepatic stiffness (-15.7%), along with improvements in the levels of inflammatory markers; tumor necrosis factor alpha (-50.9%), adiponectin (+12.0%), ferritin (-33.2%), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (-43.0%) (P < 0.05). These results suggest that WBV is an exercise option for patients with NAFLD that is effective, efficient, and convenient.Entities:
Keywords: Exercise; liver function tests; liver steatosis; liver stiffness; whole-body vibration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31087530 PMCID: PMC6513769 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Figure 1The program chart for whole‐body vibration exercise.
The outcomes of anthropometry and body composition, metabolic parameters (Insulin Resistance and Lipid Profile) values in a total of 42 subjects with NAFLD
| CON | WBV | CON vs. WBV | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Pre | Post | Change |
| Pre | Post | Change |
|
| |
| (a) Anthropometry and body composition | |||||||||
| BMI, kg m−2 | 29.2 ± 5.5 | 29.3 ± 5.4 | +0.1 | 0.863 | 29.9 ± 6.9 | 29.2 ± 6.6 | −0.7 | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Body weight, kg−1 | 78.4 ± 24.6 | 78.3 ± 24.4 | −0.1 | 0.791 | 76.3 ± 16.2 | 74.4 ± 15.9 | −1.9 | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Fat mass, kg−1 | 29.4 ± 12.0 | 30.2 ± 12.2 | +0.7 | 0.026 | 30.9 ± 12.2 | 28.8 ± 11.7 | −2.1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| SVR | 200.5 ± 64.3 | 190.1 ± 58.4 | −10.4 | 0.001 | 197.0 ± 49.0 | 212.6 ± 55.1 | +15.6 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| % Fat mass | 37.0 ± 5.8 | 38.0 ± 6.0 | +1.0 | 0.005 | 39.7 ± 8.1 | 37.9 ± 7.8 | −1.8 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| VAT area, cm2 | 129.4 ± 31.3 | 133.7 ± 31.4 | +4.3 | 0.003 | 130.7 ± 34.3 | 122.6 ± 34.1 | −8.1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| (b) Metabolic parameter | |||||||||
| LogFPG | 2.044 ± 0.092 | 2.069 ± 0.122 | +0.025 | 0.040 | 2.059 ± 0.130 | 2.040 ± 0.092 | −0.019 | 0.205 | 0.039 |
| LogFPI | 1.066 ± 0.389 | 1.032 ± 0.428 | −0.034 | 0.412 | 1.028 ± 0.270 | 0.976 ± 0.341 | −0.052 | 0.356 | 0.795 |
| LogHOMA−IR | 0.514 ± 0.414 | 0.514 ± 0.453 | 0.000 | 0.994 | 0.480 ± 0.352 | 0.409 ± 0.401 | −0.071 | 0.255 | 0.337 |
| LDLC, mg dL−1
| 134.8 ± 32.3 | 135.1 ± 34.0 | +0.3 | 0.972 | 114.8 ± 27.6 | 109.9 ± 25.6 | −4.9 | 0.097 | 0.547 |
| LogTriglycerides | 2.162 ± 0.262 | 2.222 ± 0.262 | +0.060 | 0.108 | 2.084 ± 0.198 | 2.040 ± 0.200 | −0.044 | 0.150 | 0.030 |
| LogFFA | 1.781 ± 0.131 | 1.758 ± 0.178 | −0.023 | 0.458 | 1.792 ± 0.134 | 1.706 ± 0.141 | −0.110 | 0.001 | 0.025 |
Values are presented as the group means ± SD. aANCOVA with adjustments for respective baseline values were applied to compare changed values between groups. Abbreviations: CON, control group; WBV, whole‐body vibration; BMI, body mass index; SVR, skeletal muscle mass to visceral fat area ratio; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; FPI, fasting plasma insulin; HOMA‐IR, insulin resistance by homeostasis model; FFAs, LDLC, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; FFA, free fatty acids.
Figure 2Changes in levels of hepatic steatosis and stiffness (A), liver function tests (B), from the baseline to the end point of 12 weeks in 25 subjects with NAFLD who participated in a 6‐month whole‐body vibration exercise program.
Figure 3Changes in skeletal muscle area and strength in quadriceps (A), extra‐, intramyocellular lipids (B), and intrahepatic lipids (C) from baseline to 6 months in 25 subjects with NAFLD who participated in a 6‐month whole‐body vibration exercise program. Abbreviation: IMCL, intramyocellular lipids; IHL, intrahepatic lipids.
Figure 4Changes in levels of adipokines (A), inflammation (B) and markers of apoptosis and oxidative stress (C), from baseline to 12 weeks in 25 subjects with NAFLD who participated in a 6‐month whole‐body vibration exercise program. Abbreviation: TNF‐α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; IL6, interleukin 6; hsCRP, high‐sensitivity CRP.