Literature DB >> 31087361

Individual acquisition of "stick pounding" behavior by naïve chimpanzees.

Elisa Bandini1, Claudio Tennie1.   

Abstract

Many studies investigating culture in nonhuman animals tend to focus on the inferred need of social learning mechanisms that transmit the form of a behavior to explain the population differences observed in wild animal behavioral repertoires. This research focus often results in studies overlooking the possibility of individuals being able to develop behavioral forms without requiring social learning. The disregard of individual learning abilities is most clearly observed in the nonhuman great ape literature, where there is a persistent claim that chimpanzee behaviors, in particular, require various forms of social learning mechanisms. These special social learning abilities have been argued to explain the acquisition of the relatively large behavioral repertoires observed across chimpanzee populations. However, current evidence suggests that although low-fidelity social learning plays a role in harmonizing and stabilizing the frequency of behaviors within chimpanzee populations, some (if not all) of the forms that chimpanzee behaviors take may develop independently of social learning. If so, they would be latent solutions-behavioral forms that can (re-)emerge even in the absence of observational opportunities, via individual (re)innovations. Through a combination of individual and low-fidelity social learning, the population-wide patterns of behaviors observed in great ape species are then established and stably maintained. This is the Zone of Latent Solutions (ZLS) hypothesis. The current study experimentally tested the ZLS hypothesis for pestle pounding, a wild chimpanzee behavior. We tested the reinnovation of this behavior in semi-wild chimpanzees at Chimfunshi Wildlife Orphanage in Zambia, Africa, (N = 90, tested in four social groups). Crucially, all subjects were naïve to stick pounding before testing. Three out of the four tested groups reinnovated stick pounding-clearly demonstrating that this behavioral form does not require social learning. These findings provide support for the ZLS hypothesis alongside further evidence for the individual learning abilities of chimpanzees.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chimpanzee behavior; individual learning; social learning; tool-use; zone of latent solutions

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31087361     DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  5 in total

Review 1.  A review of research in primate sanctuaries.

Authors:  Stephen R Ross; Jesse G Leinwand
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Field experiments find no evidence that chimpanzee nut cracking can be independently innovated.

Authors:  Kathelijne Koops; Aly Gaspard Soumah; Kelly L van Leeuwen; Henry Didier Camara; Tetsuro Matsuzawa
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-01-24

3.  The zone of latent solutions and its relevance to understanding ape cultures.

Authors:  Claudio Tennie; Elisa Bandini; Carel P van Schaik; Lydia M Hopper
Journal:  Biol Philos       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 1.461

4.  Testing the individual and social learning abilities of task-naïve captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes sp.) in a nut-cracking task.

Authors:  Damien Neadle; Elisa Bandini; Claudio Tennie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 5.  Clarifying Misconceptions of the Zone of Latent Solutions Hypothesis: A Response to Haidle and Schlaudt: Miriam Noël Haidle and Oliver Schlaudt: Where Does Cumulative Culture Begin? A Plea for a Sociologically Informed Perspective (Biological Theory 15: 161-174, 2020).

Authors:  Elisa Bandini; Jonathan Scott Reeves; William Daniel Snyder; Claudio Tennie
Journal:  Biol Theory       Date:  2021-02-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.