BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Vedolizumab is an anti-α4β7 biologic approved for ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's disease [CD]. We aimed to examine the association of maintenance vedolizumab concentrations with remission. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional multi-centre study of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients on maintenance vedolizumab. A homogeneous mobility shift assay [HMSA] was used to determine trough serum concentrations of vedolizumab and anti-drug antibodies [ATVs]. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission defined as a composite of clinical remission, normalized C-reactive protein [CRP] and no corticosteroid use in 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included corticosteroid-free endoscopic and deep remission. Vedolizumab concentrations were compared between patients in remission and with active disease. Logistic regression, adjusting for confounders, assessed the association between concentrations and remission. RESULTS: In total, 258 IBD patients were included [55% CD and 45% UC]. Patients in clinical and biochemical remission had significantly higher vedolizumab concentrations [12.7 µg/mL vs 10.1 µg/mL, p = 0.002]. Concentrations were also higher among patients in endoscopic and deep remission [14.2 µg/mL vs 8.5 µg/mL, p = 0.003 and 14.8 µg/mL vs 10.1 µg/mL, p = 0.01, respectively]. After controlling for potential confounders, IBD patients with vedolizumab concentrations >11.5 µg/mL were nearly 2.4 times more likely to be in corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission. Only 1.6% of patients had ATVs. CONCLUSIONS: In a large real-world cohort of vedolizumab maintenance concentrations, IBD patients with remission defined by objective measures [CRP and endoscopy] had significantly higher trough vedolizumab concentrations and immunogenicity was uncommon.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Vedolizumab is an anti-α4β7 biologic approved for ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's disease [CD]. We aimed to examine the association of maintenance vedolizumab concentrations with remission. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional multi-centre study of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients on maintenance vedolizumab. A homogeneous mobility shift assay [HMSA] was used to determine trough serum concentrations of vedolizumab and anti-drug antibodies [ATVs]. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission defined as a composite of clinical remission, normalized C-reactive protein [CRP] and no corticosteroid use in 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included corticosteroid-free endoscopic and deep remission. Vedolizumab concentrations were compared between patients in remission and with active disease. Logistic regression, adjusting for confounders, assessed the association between concentrations and remission. RESULTS: In total, 258 IBDpatients were included [55% CD and 45% UC]. Patients in clinical and biochemical remission had significantly higher vedolizumab concentrations [12.7 µg/mL vs 10.1 µg/mL, p = 0.002]. Concentrations were also higher among patients in endoscopic and deep remission [14.2 µg/mL vs 8.5 µg/mL, p = 0.003 and 14.8 µg/mL vs 10.1 µg/mL, p = 0.01, respectively]. After controlling for potential confounders, IBDpatients with vedolizumab concentrations >11.5 µg/mL were nearly 2.4 times more likely to be in corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission. Only 1.6% of patients had ATVs. CONCLUSIONS: In a large real-world cohort of vedolizumab maintenance concentrations, IBDpatients with remission defined by objective measures [CRP and endoscopy] had significantly higher trough vedolizumab concentrations and immunogenicity was uncommon.
Authors: Erwin Dreesen; Bram Verstockt; Sumin Bian; Magali de Bruyn; Griet Compernolle; Sophie Tops; Maja Noman; Gert Van Assche; Marc Ferrante; Ann Gils; Séverine Vermeire Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: William J Sandborn; Brian G Feagan; Paul Rutgeerts; Stephen Hanauer; Jean-Frédéric Colombel; Bruce E Sands; Milan Lukas; Richard N Fedorak; Scott Lee; Brian Bressler; Irving Fox; Maria Rosario; Serap Sankoh; Jing Xu; Kristin Stephens; Catherine Milch; Asit Parikh Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: W Yacoub; N Williet; L Pouillon; T Di-Bernado; M De Carvalho Bittencourt; S Nancey; A Lopez; S Paul; C Zallot; X Roblin; L Peyrin-Biroulet Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Nikolas Plevris; Philip W Jenkinson; Cher S Chuah; Mathew Lyons; Lynne M Merchant; Rebecca J Pattenden; Ian D Arnott; Gareth R Jones; Charlie W Lees Journal: Frontline Gastroenterol Date: 2019-07-03
Authors: Christoph Kessel; Miha Lavric; Toni Weinhage; Markus Brueckner; Sytze de Roock; Jan Däbritz; Jakob Weber; Sebastiaan J Vastert; Dirk Foell Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Renske W M Pauwels; Elisa Proietti; Christien J van der Woude; Lindsey Oudijk; Marie-Rose B S Crombag; Maikel P Peppelenbosch; Ursula Grohmann; Gwenny M Fuhler; Annemarie C de Vries Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2021-10-20 Impact factor: 5.325