Literature DB >> 31086135

When should we use urodynamic testing? Recommendations of the Italian Society of Urodynamics (SIUD). Part 1 - Female population.

Andrea Braga1, Enrico Finazzi Agrò2, Ester Illiano3, Francesca Manassero4, Martina Milanesi5, Franca Natale6, Marco Torella7, Donatella Pistolesi4, Cosimo De Nunzio8, Marco Soligo9, Maurizio Serati10.   

Abstract

Although, until a few years ago, the diagnostic power of urodynamic testing had never been questioned, recent studies in the literature have raised some doubts on the routine use of this tool. The benefits of the urodynamic studies (UDS) should be weighted against costs, time-consumption and patient discomfort. These recommendations are intended to guide clinicians in the right selection of the female patients to submit to a urodynamic evaluation. We reviewed the literature, regarding the use of UDS in female adults with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and pelvic floor dysfunction. Specifically, we analyzed and compared the guidelines and recommendations of the most important urology and uro-gynecology international scientific societies. These publications were used to create the evidence basis for characterizing the recommendations to perform urodynamic testing. A panel of 10 experts was composed and Delphi process was followed to obtain the panelist consensus. The final recommendations were approved by the unanimous consensus of the panel and compared with the best practice recommendations available in the literature. The recommendations are provided for diagnosis and management of common LUTS in female population. This review provides a summary of the most effective utilization of urodynamic studies for the global evaluation of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and how to use them when really needed, avoiding unnecessary costs and patient inconveniences.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31086135     DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03443-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol        ISSN: 0393-2249            Impact factor:   3.720


  3 in total

Review 1.  Forecasting the Future of Urology Practice: A Comprehensive Review of the Recommendations by International and European Associations on Priority Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Daniele Amparore; Riccardo Campi; Enrico Checcucci; Francesco Sessa; Angela Pecoraro; Andrea Minervini; Cristian Fiori; Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Sergio Serni; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2020-05-31

2.  Preoperative abdominal straining in uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence: is there a correlation with voiding dysfunction and de novo overactive bladder after mid-urethral sling procedures?

Authors:  Valerio Iacovelli; Maurizio Serati; Daniele Bianchi; Andrea Braga; Andrea Turbanti; Enrico Finazzi Agrò
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2021-11-24

Review 3.  Acceptability and perceived value of urodynamics from the patient perspective: A narrative review.

Authors:  Maurizio Serati; Andrea Braga; Peter F W M Rosier; Stefan de Wachter; Alan Uren; Enrico Finazzi-Agrò
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.367

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.