Dorus Heijnen1, Hugo Helbert1,2, Gert Luurtsema2, Philip H Elsinga2, Ben L Feringa1. 1. Stratingh Institute for Chemistry , University of Groningen , Nijenborgh 4 , 9747 AG Groningen , The Netherlands. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen , University Medical Center Groningen Hanzeplein 1 , 9713 GZ Groningen , The Netherlands.
Abstract
The synthesis of functionalized (benz)aldehydes, via a two-step, one-pot procedure, is presented. The method employs a stable aluminum hemiaminal as a tetrahedral intermediate, protecting a latent aldehyde, making it suitable for subsequent cross-coupling with (strong nucleophilic) organometallic reagents, leading to a variety of alkyl and aryl substituted benzaldehydes. This very fast methodology also facilitates the effective synthesis of a 11C radiolabeled aldehyde. Aluminum-ate complexes enable transmetalation of alkyl fragments onto palladium and subsequent cross-coupling.
The synthesis of functionalized (benz)aldehydes, via a two-step, one-pot procedure, is presented. The method employs a stable aluminum hemiaminal as a tetrahedral intermediate, protecting a latent aldehyde, making it suitable for subsequent cross-coupling with (strong nucleophilic) organometallic reagents, leading to a variety of alkyl and aryl substituted benzaldehydes. This very fast methodology also facilitates the effective synthesis of a 11C radiolabeled aldehyde. Aluminum-ate complexes enable transmetalation of alkyl fragments onto palladium and subsequent cross-coupling.
The synthesis of small, highly
functionalized molecules lies at the basis of many areas of chemistry,
ranging from drug design to (hetero)cyclic materials for photovoltaics
and ligands for catalytic applications.[1] Transition metal catalyzed cross-coupling methods for derivatization
of these compounds, despite their great versatility, frequently rely
on rather expensive coupling partners with reduced reactivity requiring
higher temperatures and long reaction times. When using highly reactive
reagents, traditional protecting group strategies are generally applied.[2] Facing environmental awareness, catalytic methods
with lighter reagents that produce less waste and of lower toxicity
should be favored according to the principles of green chemistry.[3] The application of cheaper and more reactive
organometallic reagents as coupling partners in combination with carbonyl
functional groups has some precedence, but still remains a major synthetic
challenge.[4] The reactive aldehyde functionality
in particular is prone to side reactions with organometallic reagents.
On the other hand it is this high reactivity with a range of reagents
that make aldehydes such privileged building blocks in organic synthesis,
and therefore alternative methodology allowing general and facile
synthesis of substituted (benz)aldehydes remains a highly desirable
goal. In order to prevent the fast 1,2-addition of an organometallic
nucleophile to the aldehyde (Scheme a), or over-addition to a synthetic precursor, Weinreb
amides 1 have proven themselves to be valuable precursors
to aldehydes 2. By addition of an organometallic compound
to 1, a stable tetrahedral intermediate 4 (Scheme b) is created in situ, which is not susceptible to further nucleophilic
attack.[5] We discovered that these metal
chelated intermediates, representing a protected/latent carbonyl functional
group, are stable toward organolithium cross-coupling conditions.
As a consequence, a method for the synthesis of cross-coupled ketones,
with organolithium reagents and bromo-substituted Weinreb amides as
the coupling partners via reaction intermediate 4, was
developed (Scheme b).[6]
Scheme 1
One-Pot Cross-Coupling Procedures
with Weinreb Amides to Ketones[6] and Aldehydes
Adding to the well-known transformations
of Weinreb amides, this
method provides an easy approach to cross-coupled carbonyl compounds,
and we envisioned that reduction with a (aluminum-) hydride source
would yield a hemiaminal with similar stability, facilitating a procedure
for the cross-coupling of masked aldehydes. Various Weinreb amides
are easily prepared on a multigram scale from cheap, commercially
available benzoic acids, providing a viable synthetic pathway for
the synthesis of aldehyde building blocks.As the reductant
of the Weinreb amide, diisobutylaluminum hydride
(DIBAL-H), was chosen, initial screening with Pd-complexes based on
carbene and phosphine ligands showed the latter to be the more reactive
and selective catalyst for the cross-coupling of aryl bromides with
organolithium reagents. A significant acceleration of the reaction
was observed upon preoxidation of the Pd-phosphine catalyst by means
of molecular oxygen, while preserving excellent conversion and selectivity
toward the desired aldehyde (Table ). A similar effect was observed in our previous work
and was attributed to the in situ formation of Pd
nanoparticles as the active catalyst resulting in an increase in reactivity.[7] By switching the reductant to Red-Al, the conversion
toward the aldehyde remained quantitative, but selectivity in the
subsequent coupling reaction dropped due to competing dehalogenation
of the aryl bromide. The lithium halogen exchange that leads to the
formation of benzaldehyde is expected to be accelerated by the chelating
effect of the ether moieties in the Red-Al.[8]
Table 1
Reaction Optimizationa
entry
catalyst
“H”/solvent
yieldb
1
Pd(PtBu3)2
DIBAL-H (1 equiv)/toluene
85
2
Pd(PtBu3)2
DIBAL-H (1 equiv)/toluene
87c
3
Pd(PtBu3)2
DIBAL-H (1 equiv)/THF
40
4
Ox. Pd(PtBu3)2
DIBAL-H (1 equiv)/toluene
92c
5
Ox. Pd(PtBu3)2
DIBAL-H (1 equiv)/toluene
90c,d
6
Ox. Pd(PtBu3)2
Red-Al (1 equiv)/toluene
30e
Reaction conditions: Weinreb amide
(0.3 mmol) in toluene (2 mL) at 0 °C, hydride source added dropwise
over 5 min. Catalyst added as a 10 mg/mL solution. Phenyllithium added
over 1 h by means of a syringe pump. Reaction was quenched with sat.
aq NH4Cl.
Yield
determined by GC/MS analysis
of the organic phase.
DIBAL-H
added over 1 min.
The organolithium
reagent was added
over 5 min.
Sodium bis(2-methoxyethoxy)aluminum
hydride.
Reaction conditions: Weinreb amide
(0.3 mmol) in toluene (2 mL) at 0 °C, hydride source added dropwise
over 5 min. Catalyst added as a 10 mg/mL solution. Phenyllithium added
over 1 h by means of a syringe pump. Reaction was quenched with sat.
aq NH4Cl.Yield
determined by GC/MS analysis
of the organic phase.DIBAL-H
added over 1 min.The organolithium
reagent was added
over 5 min.Sodium bis(2-methoxyethoxy)aluminum
hydride.Having the optimal
conditions for the reduction/aryl cross-coupling
(fast 1 min DIBAL-H addition at 0 °C in toluene, and Ar–Li
addition at rt, Table , entry 5) in hand, we employed various organolithium reagents (Scheme ), including phenyllithium,
as well as (functionalized) aryllithium reagents to provide 5, 6, and 7, respectively. The coupling
of a lithiated enol ether derivative and lithiated heterocycles that
are commercially available, or easily prepared via direct deprotonation,
led to products 8, 9, and 10, respectively. The direct deprotonation and coupling of ferrocene
yielded aldehyde 11, providing an easy synthetic route
toward functionalized ferrocenes, compared to current methods.[9]
Scheme 2
Scope of the One-Pot Reduction/Cross-Coupling
Strategy for Substituted
Benzaldehydes
Reaction conditions: Weinreb
amide (0.5 mmol) in toluene (2 mL) at 0 °C, DIBAL-H added dropwise
over 5 min. Pre-oxidized catalyst (5 mol %) added as a 10 mg/mL solution.
Organolithium reagent added over 10 min by means of a syringe pump.
Reaction was quenched with sat. aq NH4Cl. Yields refer
to isolated yields after column chromatography.
Lower yield due to volatile product.
Yield corrected for minor
isobutylbenzaldehyde impurities.
Performed on 1 mmol scale.
Scope of the One-Pot Reduction/Cross-Coupling
Strategy for Substituted
Benzaldehydes
Reaction conditions: Weinreb
amide (0.5 mmol) in toluene (2 mL) at 0 °C, DIBAL-H added dropwise
over 5 min. Pre-oxidized catalyst (5 mol %) added as a 10 mg/mL solution.
Organolithium reagent added over 10 min by means of a syringe pump.
Reaction was quenched with sat. aq NH4Cl. Yields refer
to isolated yields after column chromatography.Lower yield due to volatile product.Yield corrected for minor
isobutylbenzaldehyde impurities.Performed on 1 mmol scale.Expanding
the scope of the organolithium coupling partner to alkyl
fragments, we were able to isolate the methyl, ethyl, and trimethylsilylmethylene
substituted benzaldehydes 12, 13, and 14 with little to no alteration to the previously optimized
procedure. Interestingly the coupling of cyclopropyl lithium yielded
benzaldehyde 15 providing a valuable method for the incorporation
of this motif in medicinally relevant compounds.[10] Unfortunately, the relatively light and volatile aldehydes
showed significant loss in yield upon purification (GC-MS conversion
for those compounds are given in the Supporting Information). The Weinreb amide used in this transformation
was also varied (Scheme ), and the less volatile naphthyl-analogue 16 proved
to be less prone to evaporation and was isolated in 63% yield. It
was found that meta-bromo substituted Weinreb amides
were also reactive under the standard reaction conditions and provided
aldehydes 17 and 18 in good yield, the latter
being obtained after a double cross-coupling reaction starting from
the 3,5-dibromo-N-methoxy-N-methylbenzamide.
Methoxy substituted aldehydes could also be synthesized illustrated
by the preparation of compound 19. 2,5-Dimethyl substituted
Weinreb amide was also subjected to reduction followed by a cross-coupling
reaction but afforded compound 20 in low yield. The decrease
in yield was anticipated to be a consequence of the lower stability
of the aluminum intermediate, induced by the additional steric bulk
from the two ortho-methyl substituents.
Scheme 3
Variation
of the Weinreb Amide
Starting from the
corresponding
dibromo compounds. Cross-coupling step performed using 3 equiv of
PhLi.
Variation
of the Weinreb Amide
Starting from the
corresponding
dibromo compounds. Cross-coupling step performed using 3 equiv of
PhLi.We have previously successfully incorporated
the short-lived 11C isotope (t1/2 = 20.3 min) for
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) by means of a palladium catalyzed
cross-coupling of methyl-lithium with aryl bromides. In expanding
the scope of the organolithium cross-coupling, the rapid formation
of radiolabeled aldehydes remains a synthetically challenging, but
highly desirable, goal.[11] Due to the limited
amount of methods available for the preparation or functionalization
of radiolabeled aldehydes, we set out to design a method for the incorporation
of 11C in (substituted) benzaldehydes for future PET tracer
development. By employing the above-described general reduction/cross-coupling
strategy, we aimed to synthesize compound [methyl-C]16 as a model substrate. With
our previously described method for making [11C]methyllithium
from [11C]methyl iodide by means of an in situ lithium halogen exchange with n-BuLi, the one-pot
procedure described above yields the isolated target molecule [methyl-C]16 in a 23%
decay corrected yield with a radiochemical purity of >99% and a
reaction
time of only 4 min (Scheme ).
Scheme 4
Synthesis of Radiolabeled [11C]6-Methyl-2-naphthaldehyde
To the best of our knowledge,
this is one of the few examples of
the formation of radiolabeled (substituted) benzaldehydes. Radiolabeled
aldehydes used as such or followed by rapid transformation,[12] taking advantage of its high reactivity, could
play an important role in the synthesis of new PET-tracers, vital
for mapping of processes and biological targets in the human body.Upon further expansion of the scope to other alkyllithium reagents,
we observed the competing coupling of an isobutyl group, originating
from the DIBAL-aminal intermediate. It is known that, for cross-coupling
reactions, mixed aryl/alkyl aluminum species selectively transmetallate
the sp2 center, and only trialkyl-aluminum species transfer
the sp3 center.[13] We expected
the isobutyl to derive from the aluminum–ate complex, which
is formed after addition of the alkyllithium reagent.Table shows the
selectivity toward cross-coupling of isobutyl versus that of the added
alkyl fragment. Tetrahedral intermediate 1-th is formed
upon DIBAL-H addition and is the precursor to the anionic aluminum-ate
complex 1-ate upon alkyllithium addition. For both n-butyl- (entries 1–3) and isopropyl-lithium (entries
4 and 5), varying selectivity for the alkyl substituted benzaldehyde
was found, regardless of addition speed or reaction temperature. We
were unable to find reaction conditions that gave satisfactory selectivity
toward the desired product. In order to force the selectivity toward
isobutyl (originating from the DIBAL-H fragment) coupling, the reluctant
coupling partner t-BuLi was added, which indeed showed
full selectivity in the alkyl transfer toward the isobutyl coupled
benzaldehyde 21b (entries 6, 7). Similar to our previous
findings on homocoupling reactions of aryl bromides, the lithium halogen
exchange is a prominent reaction pathway, and thus a significant amount
of 4,4′-bisbenzaldehyde was observed.
Table 2
Scrambling
of Alkyl Fragments upon
Alkyllithium Addition and Cross-Coupling
entry
R–Li
temp (°C)
selectivitya21a/21b
1
nBuLi
23
95–60b/5–40
2
nBuLi
0
65/35
3
nBuLi
45
85/15
4
iPr–Li
23
68/32
5
iPr–Li
0
61/39
6
tBu–Li
23
<1/99c,d
7
tBu–Li
0
<1/99c,d
As determined by GC/MS analysis.
Selectivity varied under identical
reaction conditions.
Varying
amounts of homocoupling
(bis-benzaldehyde) were also observed.
Reversed selectivity: only the isobutyl
coupled benzaldehyde observed.
As determined by GC/MS analysis.Selectivity varied under identical
reaction conditions.Varying
amounts of homocoupling
(bis-benzaldehyde) were also observed.Reversed selectivity: only the isobutyl
coupled benzaldehyde observed.In order to check for the formation of free isobutyllithium (displacement
of the alkyl fragment by n-butyllithium), a range
of starting materials and mixtures were subjected to 1H
NMR analysis (Figure ). The CH2 fragment of the isobutyl in DIBAL-H (spectrum
1) is clearly visible at 0.44 ppm and is completely consumed upon
addition to the Weinreb amide starting material (spectrum 2). The
large variety of signals between 0 and 0.4 ppm can be explained by
the generation of unequal alkyl fragments on the aluminum center,
in combination with diastereotopic protons. Upon addition of n-butyllithium, the CH2 fragment of the linear
alkyl chains becomes apparent at −0.17 ppm (spectrum 3). A
similar trend is visible when the trialkyl-aluminum complex (doublet
at 0.38, spectrum 4) is mixed with n-butyllithium
(spectrum 5) where an upfield shift is observed that leads to a signal
at −0.32 ppm. When this mixture is added to a stirred solution
of Pd-catalyst and 1-bromonaphthalene, a similar product distribution
to that of Table ,
entry 2 between n- and isobutyl coupled naphthalene
is observed. Finally, as a control, the pure sample of both n-butyllithium (spectrum 6) and isobutyllithium (spectrum
7) provided the reference for the hypothesis that no observable free
alkyllithium is present in sample 3 and 5. This, together with literature
precedence, supports the hypothesis of the unselective alkyl transmetalation
from aluminum to palladium.[14]
Figure 1
1H NMR studies of DIBAL-H reduction of Weinreb amides.
Conditions: Concentration of all reagents: 0.1 mmol in 0.5 mL of Tol-d8. Reduction and n-BuLi addition
performed at 0 °C.
1H NMR studies of DIBAL-H reduction of Weinreb amides.
Conditions: Concentration of all reagents: 0.1 mmol in 0.5 mL of Tol-d8. Reduction and n-BuLi addition
performed at 0 °C.The reduction/cross-coupling strategy could be further expanded
from Weinreb amides to ketones. Ketones such as acetophenones are
easily prepared via Friedel–Craft acetylation and make up an
important class of chemical intermediates. In a two-step procedure,
the acidic proton of the benzylic alcohol would consume a stoichiometric
amount of organolithium reagent. It is therefore determined that this
group is suitably protected as a metal alkoxide (for example an aluminum
alkoxide), which is conveniently formed upon reduction of the carbonyl
by means of DIBAL-H. The transfer of the hydride leads to an aluminum
alkoxide, suitable for subsequent cross-coupling with an organolithium
reagent. Secondary alcohols 22, 23, and 24 were obtained following this strategy, providing a viable
route toward both cyclic and linear structures (Scheme ).
Scheme 5
One-Pot Preparation of Secondary Alcohols via DIBAL-H
Reduction/Cross-Coupling Reaction
The isobutyl transfer observed in previous examples led
us to attempt
the twofold use of DIBAL-H in the reaction with 4-bromoacetophenone.
Reduction of the acetophenone moiety yields a substituted benzylic
aluminum alkoxide that can be further functionalized. Addition of tert-butyllithium is hypothesized to generate 26, a similar ate complex as shown in the previous section. Selective
isobutyl transmetalation from aluminum to palladium and consecutive
cross-coupling readily give access to industrially relevant alcohol 25, a precursor to anti-inflammatory agent Ibuprofen, in 43%
yield (Scheme ).[15]
Scheme 6
Twofold Use of DIBAL-H in the Reduction
and Cross-Coupling of 4-Bromoacetophenone
In conclusion, we have shown that the DIBAL-H reduction
of Weinreb
amides yields a masked aldehyde in the form of a stable aluminum aminal
intermediate, providing a platform for subsequent functionalization
with nucleophilic cross-coupling partners. The method not only provides
an alternative route to aldehydes but also is applicable to ketones,
yielding secondary alcohols, as showcased by the twofold use (reducing
agent and alkyl transfer agent) of DIBAL-H in the synthesis of an
Ibuprofen precursor. 1H NMR studies show the formation
of an aluminum–ate complex upon addition of primary and secondary
alkyllithium reagents, which is hypothesized to transfer an alkyl
fragment on to palladium, followed by cross-coupling. These aluminum
aminal intermediates might provide attractive opportunities in other
multistep one-pot procedures.
Authors: Hiroshi Naka; Masanobu Uchiyama; Yotaro Matsumoto; Andrew E H Wheatley; Mary McPartlin; James V Morey; Yoshinori Kondo Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Estíbaliz Merino; Rosanne P A Melo; Montserrat Ortega-Guerra; María Ribagorda; M Carmen Carreño Journal: J Org Chem Date: 2009-04-03 Impact factor: 4.354
Authors: Paul Knochel; Wolfgang Dohle; Nina Gommermann; Florian F Kneisel; Felix Kopp; Tobias Korn; Ioannis Sapountzis; Viet Anh Vu Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2003-09-22 Impact factor: 15.336