Literature DB >> 31082934

Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: A SCIENTIFIC STATEMENT FROM THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND PULMONARY REHABILITATION, THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, AND THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY.

Randal J Thomas, Alexis L Beatty, Theresa M Beckie, LaPrincess C Brewer, Todd M Brown, Daniel E Forman, Barry A Franklin, Steven J Keteyian, Dalane W Kitzman, Judith G Regensteiner, Bonnie K Sanderson, Mary A Whooley.   

Abstract

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an evidence-based intervention that uses patient education, health behavior modification, and exercise training to improve secondary prevention outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. CR programs reduce morbidity and mortality rates in adults with ischemic heart disease, heart failure, or cardiac surgery but are significantly underused, with only a minority of eligible patients participating in CR in the United States. New delivery strategies are urgently needed to improve participation. One potential strategy is home-based CR (HBCR). In contrast to center-based CR services, which are provided in a medically supervised facility, HBCR relies on remote coaching with indirect exercise supervision and is provided mostly or entirely outside of the traditional center-based setting. Although HBCR has been successfully deployed in the United Kingdom, Canada, and other countries, most US healthcare organizations have little to no experience with such programs. The purpose of this scientific statement is to identify the core components, efficacy, strengths, limitations, evidence gaps, and research necessary to guide the future delivery of HBCR in the United States. Previous randomized trials have generated low- to moderate-strength evidence that HBCR and center-based CR can achieve similar improvements in 3- to 12-month clinical outcomes. Although HBCR appears to hold promise in expanding the use of CR to eligible patients, additional research and demonstration projects are needed to clarify, strengthen, and extend the HBCR evidence base for key subgroups, including older adults, women, underrepresented minority groups, and other higher-risk and understudied groups. In the interim, we conclude that HBCR may be a reasonable option for selected clinically stable low- to moderate-risk patients who are eligible for CR but cannot attend a traditional center-based CR program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31082934      PMCID: PMC7530797          DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev        ISSN: 1932-7501            Impact factor:   2.081


  102 in total

1.  Increasing referral and participation rates to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: the valuable role of healthcare professionals in the inpatient and home health settings: a science advisory from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Ross Arena; Mark Williams; Daniel E Forman; Lawrence P Cahalin; Lola Coke; Jonathan Myers; Larry Hamm; Penny Kris-Etherton; Reed Humphrey; Vera Bittner; Carl J Lavie
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Home-based cardiac rehabilitation is as effective as centre-based cardiac rehabilitation among elderly with coronary heart disease: results from a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Bodil Oerkild; Marianne Frederiksen; Jorgen Fischer Hansen; Lene Simonsen; Lene Theil Skovgaard; Eva Prescott
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  ACCF/AHA/AMA-PCPI 2011 performance measures for adults with coronary artery disease and hypertension: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and the American Medical Association-Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement.

Authors:  Joseph Drozda; Joseph V Messer; John Spertus; Bruce Abramowitz; Karen Alexander; Craig T Beam; Robert O Bonow; Jill S Burkiewicz; Michael Crouch; David C Goff; Richard Hellman; Thomas James; Marjorie L King; Edison A Machado; Eduardo Ortiz; Michael O'Toole; Stephen D Persell; Jesse M Pines; Frank J Rybicki; Lawrence B Sadwin; Joanna D Sikkema; Peter K Smith; Patrick J Torcson; John B Wong
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Cardiac rehabilitation and risk reduction: time to "rebrand and reinvigorate".

Authors:  Pratik B Sandesara; Cameron T Lambert; Neil F Gordon; Gerald F Fletcher; Barry A Franklin; Nanette K Wenger; Laurence Sperling
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Long-term Exercise Adherence After High-intensity Interval Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Randomized Study.

Authors:  Inger-Lise Aamot; Trine Karlsen; Håvard Dalen; Asbjørn Støylen
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2015-02-16

6.  Home-based cardiac rehabilitation and lifestyle modification: the MULTIFIT model.

Authors:  N H Miller; D Warren; D Myers
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  A comparison of home and hospital-based exercise training in heart failure: immediate and long-term effects upon physical activity level.

Authors:  Aynsley Cowie; Morag K Thow; Malcolm H Granat; Sarah L Mitchell
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2011-02-18

8.  Participation in cardiac rehabilitation, readmissions, and death after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Quinn R Pack; Randal J Thomas; Jill M Killian; Véronique L Roger
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 9.  The efficacy and safety of exercise programs in cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  W L Haskell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Cardiac rehabilitation program attendance after coronary artery bypass surgery: overcoming the barriers.

Authors:  Rosemary O Higgins; Barbara M Murphy; Alan J Goble; Michael R Le Grande; Peter C Elliott; Marian U C Worcester
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 7.738

View more
  17 in total

1.  Cognitive decrement in older adults with symptomatic peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Andrew W Gardner; Polly S Montgomery; Ming Wang; Biyi Shen; Ana I Casanegra; Federico Silva-Palacios; Zoltan Ungvari; Andriy Yabluchanskiy; Anna Csiszar; Shari R Waldstein
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 7.713

2.  A Strategy to Mitigate Airborne Particle Accumulation During Exercise in a Cardiac Rehabilitation Center.

Authors:  Shane M Hammer; Joshua R Smith; Eric J Bruhn; Randal J Thomas; Thomas P Olson
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.646

3.  Financial Analysis of Cardiac Rehabilitation and the Impact of COVID-19.

Authors:  Heidi S Melbostad; Patrick D Savage; Katharine Mahoney; Diann E Gaalema; Philip A Ades; Donald S Shepard
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.646

Review 4.  Prevalence, Impact, and Trajectories of Sleep Disturbance in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A NARRATIVE REVIEW AND SUGGESTIONS FOR EVALUATION AND TREATMENT.

Authors:  Caitlan A Tighe; Daniel J Buysse; Debra K Weiner; Gregory P Beehler; Daniel E Forman
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.646

5.  Cognition and Exercise: GENERAL OVERVIEW AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CARDIAC REHABILITATION.

Authors:  Diann E Gaalema; Katharine Mahoney; Jacob S Ballon
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.081

6.  Area Deprivation Index and Cardiovascular Events: CAN CARDIAC REHABILITATION MITIGATE THE EFFECTS?

Authors:  Emily N Guhl; Jianhui Zhu; Amber Johnson; Utibe Essien; Floyd Thoma; Suresh R Mulukutla; Jared W Magnani
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.646

7.  A Comparison of Exercise Intensity in Hybrid Versus Standard Phase Two Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Steven J Keteyian; Crystal Grimshaw; Clinton A Brawner; Dennis J Kerrigan; Lisa Reasons; Robert Berry; Edward L Peterson; Jonathon K Ehrman
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.646

Review 8.  Enhancing participation in cardiac rehabilitation: Focus on underserved populations.

Authors:  Philip A Ades; Sherrie Khadanga; Patrick D Savage; Diann E Gaalema
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 11.278

Review 9.  Asynchronous and Synchronous Delivery Models for Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: A SCIENTIFIC REVIEW.

Authors:  Randal J Thomas; Cara E Petersen; Thomas P Olson; Alexis L Beatty; Rongjing Ding; Marta Supervia
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.646

10.  The Million Hearts Initiative: CATALYZING UTILIZATION OF CARDIAC REHABILITATION AND ACCELERATING IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW CARE MODELS.

Authors:  Hilary K Wall; Haley Stolp; Janet S Wright; Matthew D Ritchey; Randal J Thomas; Philip A Ades; Laurence S Sperling
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.646

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.