Literature DB >> 31082909

Surgeon, Hospital, and Geographic Variation in Minimally Invasive Colectomy.

Christopher T Aquina1, Adan Z Becerra1, Carla F Justiniano1, Zhaomin Xu1, Francis P Boscoe2, Maria J Schymura2, Katia Noyes1, John R T Monson1,3, Larissa K Temple1, Fergal J Fleming1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify sources of variation in the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for colectomy.
BACKGROUND: MIS is associated with decreased analgesic use, shorter length of stay, and faster postoperative recovery. This study identified factors explaining variation in MIS use for colectomy.
METHODS: The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System was queried for scheduled admissions in which a colectomy was performed for neoplastic, diverticular, or inflammatory bowel disease between 2008 and 2015. Mixed-effects analyses were performed assessing surgeon, hospital, and geographic variation and factors associated with an MIS approach.
RESULTS: Among 45,714 colectomies, 68.1% were performed using an MIS approach. Wide variation in the rate of MIS was present across 1253 surgeons (median 50%, interquartile range 10.9%-84.2%, range 0.3%-99.7%). Calculating intraclass correlation coefficients after controlling for case-mix, 62.8% of the total variation in MIS usage was attributable to surgeon variation compared with 28.5% attributable to patient variation, 7% attributable to hospital variation, and 1.6% attributable to geographic variation. Surgeon-years in practice since residency/fellowship completion explained 19.2% of the surgeon variation, surgeon volume explained 5.2%, hospital factors explained 0.1%, and patient factors explained 0%.
CONCLUSIONS: Wide surgeon variation exists regarding an MIS approach for colectomy, and most of the total variation is attributable to individual surgeon practices-much of which is related to year of graduation. As increasing surgeon age is inversely proportional to the rate of MIS, patient referral and/or providing tailored training to older surgeons may be constructive targets in increasing the use of MIS and reducing healthcare utilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31082909     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  7 in total

1.  With widespread adoption of MIS colectomy for colon cancer, does hospital type matter?

Authors:  K Freischlag; M Adam; M Turner; J Watson; B Ezekian; P M Schroder; C Mantyh; J Migaly
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Quality and Location of the Surgical Episode Mediate a Large Proportion of Socioeconomic-Based Survival Disparities in Patients with Resected Stage I-III Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas S Swords; Brian K Bednarski; Craig A Messick; Matthew M Tillman; George J Chang; Y Nancy You
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Minimally invasive vs. open segmental resection of the splenic flexure for cancer: a nationwide study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology-Colorectal Cancer Network (SICO-CNN).

Authors:  Maurizio Degiuli; Monica Ortenzi; Mariano Tomatis; Lucia Puca; Desiree Cianflocca; Daniela Rega; Annalisa Maroli; Ugo Elmore; Francesca Pecchini; Marco Milone; Roberta La Mendola; Erica Soligo; Simona Deidda; Domenico Spoletini; Diletta Cassini; Alessandra Aprile; Michela Mineccia; Herald Nikaj; Francesco Marchegiani; Fabio Maiello; Cristina Bombardini; Michele Zuolo; Michele Carlucci; Luca Ferraro; Armando Falato; Alberto Biondi; Roberto Persiani; Patrizia Marsanich; Daniele Fusario; Leonardo Solaini; Sara Pollesel; Gianluca Rizzo; Claudio Coco; Alberto Di Leo; Davide Cavaliere; Franco Roviello; Andrea Muratore; Domenico D'Ugo; Francesco Bianco; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Paola De Nardi; Marco Rigamonti; Gabriele Anania; Claudio Belluco; Roberto Polastri; Salvatore Pucciarelli; Sergio Gentilli; Alessandro Ferrero; Stefano Scabini; Gianandrea Baldazzi; Massimo Carlini; Angelo Restivo; Silvio Testa; Dario Parini; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Micaela Piccoli; Riccardo Rosati; Antonino Spinelli; Paolo Delrio; Felice Borghi; Marco Guerrieri; Rossella Reddavid
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Variation in Adequate Lymph Node Yield for Gastric, Lung, and Bladder Cancer: Attributable to the Surgeon, Pathologist, or Hospital?

Authors:  Christopher T Aquina; Matthew Truong; Carla F Justiniano; Roma Kaur; Zhaomin Xu; Francis P Boscoe; Maria J Schymura; Adan Z Becerra
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Is robotic utilization associated with increased minimally invasive colorectal surgery rates? Surgeon-level evidence.

Authors:  Carla F Justiniano; Adan Z Becerra; Anthony Loria; Zhaomin Xu; Christopher T Aquina; Larissa K Temple; Fergal J Fleming
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.453

6.  Inequalities in access to minimally invasive general surgery: a comprehensive nationwide analysis across 20 years.

Authors:  Marcel André Schneider; Daniel Gero; Matteo Müller; Karoline Horisberger; Andreas Rickenbacher; Matthias Turina
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Association of Insurance Coverage With Adoption of Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Gastric Bypass for Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Ryan Howard; Edward C Norton; Jie Yang; Jyothi Thumma; David E Arterburn; Andrew Ryan; Dana Telem; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-08-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.