Literature DB >> 31082900

Pouch Versus No Pouch Following Total Gastrectomy: Meta-analysis of Randomized and Non-randomized Studies.

Nicholas L Syn1,2, Ian Wee1,2, Asim Shabbir1,2, Guowei Kim1, Jimmy Bok-Yan So1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of pouch reconstruction on perioperative outcomes, postprandial symptoms, nutritional and anthropometric parameters, and overall quality of life after total gastrectomy for gastric malignancy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The short-term perioperative risks and longer term functional value of creating a small-bowel reservoir after total gastrectomy are contended.
METHODS: A search for randomized and non-randomized studies comparing reconstruction with or without a pouch was conducted. Treatment effects were computed using pairwise random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression, and the systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines.
RESULTS: A total of 17 randomized trials and 8 observational studies involving 1621 participants were included. Pouch creation is associated with an increased operation time [259.3 vs 235.8 min; weighted mean difference (WMD) 23.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.8-37.2], but not hospitalization duration. There was no difference in overall postsurgical complications, including anastomotic leak and abdominal abscess. Pouch formation markedly reduces the risk of dumping syndrome at 3 to 6 months [8.1% vs 32.4%; risk ratios (RR) 0.36, 95% CI, 0.21-0.60] and 12 to 24 months (2.8% vs 23.6%; RR 0.27, 95% CI, 0.16-0.46). The functional advantages of pouch reconstruction persist at 1 to 2 years, with aggregated data indicating considerably lower risks of esophagitis and heartburn (63% relative reduction), dumping syndrome (73% relative reduction), and food intake disturbance (50% relative reduction). At 12 to 24 months, albumin levels (40.5 vs 37.9 g/L; WMD 2.59, 95% CI, 1.35-3.84) and body mass index (22.2 vs 20.9 kg/m; WMD 1.28, 95% CI, 0.61-1.94) are significantly higher among participants with a pouch.
CONCLUSIONS: Pouch creation improves long-term functional and nutritional outcomes after total gastrectomy, without greater perioperative morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31082900     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Reconstruction following gastrectomy].

Authors:  Marie-Christin Weber; Maximilian Berlet; Alexander Novotny; Helmut Friess; Daniel Reim
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing liver resection for large (≥ 50 mm) colorectal metastases.

Authors:  Davit L Aghayan; Gabriella d'Albenzio; Åsmund A Fretland; Egidijus Pelanis; Bård I Røsok; Sheraz Yaqub; Rafael Palomar; Bjørn Edwin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 3.  [Reconstruction and functional results after gastric resection].

Authors:  W Schröder; H Fuchs; J Straatman; B Babic
Journal:  Chirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-08-29

Review 4.  Quality of Life After Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer: Survey Metrics and Implications of Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Yinin Hu; Victor M Zaydfudim
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  National Underutilization of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Natalie Liu; Yiwei Xu; Amir A Rahnemai-Azar; Daniel E Abbott; Sharon M Weber; Anne O Lidor
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  [S3 guidelines on gastric cancer-diagnosis and treatment of adenocarcinoma of the stomach and esophagogastric junction : Version 2.0-August 2019. AWMF register number: 032/009OL].

Authors:  Stefan Mönig; Katja Ott; Ines Gockel; Dietmar Lorenz; Kaja Ludwig; Helmut Messmann; Markus Moehler; Pompiliu Piso; Arved Weimann; Hans-Joachim Meyer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  The role of the laparoscopic approach in two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Emily Taillieu; Celine De Meyere; Mathieu D'Hondt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Effect of Home Enteral Nutritional Support Compared With Normal Oral Diet in Postoperative Subjects With Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Resection: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Xuling Pan; SuQing Zhao; RuiJun Ren; GuiXia Chang; Yu Mao
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-18

9.  Effects of creating a jejunal pouch on postoperative quality of life after total gastrectomy: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Toshikatsu Tsuji; Taro Isobe; Yasuyuki Seto; Chie Tanaka; Kazuyuki Kojima; Masaaki Motoori; Masami Ikeda; Toshikatsu Nitta; Atsushi Oshio; Koji Nakada
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-09-08

10.  Laparoscopic surgery for oncologic extended resection of T1b and T2 incidental gallbladder carcinoma at a high-volume center: a single-center experience in China.

Authors:  Parbatraj Regmi; Hai-Jie Hu; Yin Chang-Hao; Fei Liu; Wen-Jie Ma; Cong-Dun Ran; Jun-Ke Wang; Aliza Paudyal; Nan-Sheng Cheng; Fu-Yu Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.