| Literature DB >> 31082891 |
Amy K Eichner1, Jon Coyles2, Matthew Fedoruk1, Timothy D Maxey3, Robert A Lenaghan4, Jeff Novitzky5, Andrea T Lindsey6, Patricia A Deuster6.
Abstract
The presence of performance-enhancing drugs in dietary supplements poses serious anti-doping and health risks to athletes and military service members. A positive drug test, suboptimal health, or adverse event can ruin a career in either setting. These populations need to be certain in advance that a product is of high quality and free from performance-enhancing drugs and other banned substances. However, no regulatory authority conducts or mandates a quality review before dietary supplements are sold. Under the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, the Food and Drug Administration does not have a role in the premarket safety review of dietary supplements. Due to the increasing demand for high-quality, properly labeled dietary supplements, multiple companies have stepped into this void by offering testing and quality review programs for dietary supplements. Each of these third-party programs has its own quality assurance program with varying testing components. It is difficult for consumers in the sport and military settings to assess whether a particular certification program reduces the risks enough so that they can use a product with confidence. This article puts forward the consensus of the authors on current best practices for third-party certification programs for dietary supplements consumed by athletes and military service members. Also discussed are important ways that third-party programs can develop in the future to improve access to safe, high-quality dietary supplements for these populations.Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31082891 DOI: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000595
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Sports Med Rep ISSN: 1537-890X Impact factor: 1.733