Literature DB >> 31082744

A cohort study comparing the severity and outcome of intrauterine adhesiolysis for Asherman syndrome after first- or second-trimester termination of pregnancy.

Ru Zhu1, Lu Gan2, Sha Wang3, Hua Duan4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical characteristics of Asherman syndrome and the outcomes of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in women after first or second-trimester termination of pregnancy (TOP).
METHODS: This was a retrospective descriptive analysis of patients with moderate-to-severe intrauterine adhesiolysis (IUAs) after TOP and treated by hysteroscopic adhesiolysis and followed by "second-look" hysteroscopy 3 months later at The Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (China) between January 2013 and March 2016. The American Fertility Society (AFS) scoring system was used to evaluate the intrauterine adhesions.
RESULTS: A total of 236 patients with 180 first-trimester TOP and 56 s-trimester TOP patients were included. The severe adhesion and amenorrhea rates during the second-trimester group (69.6% and 39.3%, respectively) were significantly higher than those in the first-trimester group (36.7% and 7.2%, respectively). AFS score reduction in the second-trimester group (6.2 ± 2.8) was significantly lower than in the first-trimester group (6.5 ± 2.5). The pregnancy rates in the second-trimester group (21.4%) were significantly lower than that in the first-trimester group (43.3%). The pregnancy rate of severe intrauterine adhesions in second-trimester TOP (10.3%) was significantly lower than in first-trimester TOP (40.9%).
CONCLUSION: These findings suggested that second trimester TOP was associated with more severe intrauterine adhesion and a worse prognosis after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in women with Asherman syndrome when compared to first-trimester TOP.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  First-trimester termination of pregnancy; Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis; Intrauterine adhesions; Pregnancy rate; Second-trimester termination of pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31082744     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  5 in total

1.  Decision tree model predicts live birth after surgery for moderate-to-severe intrauterine adhesions.

Authors:  Ru Zhu; Hua Duan; Wenbin Xu; Sha Wang; Lu Gan; Qian Xu; Jinjiao Li
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Pregnancy Patterns Impact Live Birth Rate for Patients With Intrauterine Adhesions After Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Dan Sun; Xuetao Mao; Aiqian Zhang; Bingsi Gao; Huan Huang; Arvind Burjoo; Dabao Xu; Xingping Zhao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Study on Risk Factors Related to Intrauterine Adhesion Based on Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sijing Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Management of concomitant cervical insufficiency and intrauterine adhesions.

Authors:  Zaneta Kimber-Trojnar
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04

5.  Patient-reported menstrual and obstetric outcomes following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman syndrome.

Authors:  Blanca Morales; Peter Movilla; Joyce Wang; Jennifer Wang; Alexandria Williams; Tammy Chen; Himabindu Reddy; Jovana Tavcar; Megan Loring; Stephanie Morris; Keith Isaacson
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-01-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.