Literature DB >> 31082324

Cycling performed on an innovative ergometer at different intensities-durations in men: neuromuscular fatigue and recovery kinetics.

Renata L Krüger1, Saied Jalal Aboodarda1, Libia Marcela Jaimes1, Pierre Samozino2, Guillaume Y Millet1.   

Abstract

The majority of studies have routinely measured neuromuscular (NM) fatigue with a delay (∼1-3 min) after cycling exercises. This is problematic since NM fatigue can massively recover within the first 1-2 min after exercise. This study investigated the etiology of knee extensors (KE) NM fatigue and recovery kinetics in response to cycling exercises by assessing NM function as early as 10 s following cycling and up to 8 min of recovery. Ten young males performed different cycling exercises on different days: a Wingate (WING), a 10-min task at severe-intensity (SEV), and a 90-min task at moderate-intensity (MOD). Electrically evoked and isometric maximal voluntary contractions (IMVC) of KE were assessed before, after, and during recovery. SEV induced the highest decrease in IMVC. Peak twitch (Pt) was more reduced in WING and SEV than in MOD (p < 0.001), whereas voluntary activation decreased more after MOD than WING (p = 0.043). Regarding Pt and the ratio between low- and high-frequency doublet (i.e., low-frequency fatigue), recovery was faster for WING, whereas IMVC and high-frequency doublet recovered slower during MOD (p < 0.05). Our results confirm that peripheral fatigue is greater after WING and SEV, while central fatigue is greater following MOD. Peripheral fatigue can substantially recover within minutes after a supramaximal exercise while NM function recovered slower after prolonged, moderate-intensity exercise. This study provides an accurate estimation of NM fatigue and recovery kinetics because of dynamic exercise with large muscle mass by significantly shortening the delay for postexercise measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  central fatigue; dynamic exercise; electrical stimulation; exercice dynamique; fatigue centrale; fatigue périphérique; peripheral fatigue; stimulation électrique

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31082324     DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  5 in total

1.  Evaluating the Accuracy of Using Fixed Ranges of METs to Categorize Exertional Intensity in a Heterogeneous Group of Healthy Individuals: Implications for Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Danilo Iannetta; Daniel A Keir; Federico Y Fontana; Erin Calaine Inglis; Anmol T Mattu; Donald H Paterson; Silvia Pogliaghi; Juan M Murias
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Greater Short-Time Recovery of Peripheral Fatigue After Short- Compared With Long-Duration Time Trial.

Authors:  Christian Froyd; Fernando G Beltrami; Guillaume Y Millet; Brian R MacIntosh; Timothy D Noakes
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Effects of caffeine on central and peripheral fatigue following closed- and open-loop cycling exercises.

Authors:  P G Couto; M D Silva-Cavalcante; B Mezêncio; R A Azevedo; R Cruz; R Bertuzzi; A E Lima-Silva; M A P D Kiss
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.590

4.  Downhill running affects the late but not the early phase of the rate of force development.

Authors:  Giorgio Varesco; Giuseppe Coratella; Vianney Rozand; Benjamin Cuinet; Giovanni Lombardi; Laurent Mourot; Gianluca Vernillo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Effects of Different Durations at Fixed Intensity Exercise on Internal Load and Recovery-A Feasibility Pilot Study on Duration as an Independent Variable for Exercise Prescription.

Authors:  Philipp Birnbaumer; Lena Weiner; Tanja Handl; Gerhard Tschakert; Peter Hofmann
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2022-07-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.