| Literature DB >> 31080813 |
G Acmaz1, L Cınar2, B Acmaz3, H Aksoy4, Yusuf Taner Kafadar5, Y Madendag1, F Ozdemir1, E Sahin6, I Muderris1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Many patients who were diagnosed as polycystic ovary syndrome- (PCOS-) related acne were not capable of sustaining or beginning oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) due to pill scaring, contraindications of OCP use, migraine, or smoking. In this situation, oral isotretinoin treatment may become an important option for PCOS-related acne. The aim of the study was to determine the effects of isotretinoin treatment on PCOS patients who were complicated with severe cystic acne.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31080813 PMCID: PMC6475563 DOI: 10.1155/2019/2513067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Evaluation of ovarian reserve, hirsutism, and acne scoring.
| Pre-treatment n=40 | Post-treatment n=40 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modified Ferriman-Gallwey Score | 11,75 ± 4,07 | 11,08 ± 3,74 | 0,011 |
| Acne Scoring | 2(2-3) | 0(0-0,75) | <0,001 |
| Ovarian volume right | 11(8-13) | 9(7-11,75) | 0,026 |
| Ovarian volume left | 10,5(8-13,75) | 8(7-10,75) | 0,018 |
| Follicle count right | 10(9-11) | 7(6,25-8) | <0,001 |
| Follicle count left | 9,88 ± 2,28 | 6,3 ± 1,71 | <0,001 |
To test the normality assumption of the data, Shapiro Wilk was used. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (25th percentile – 75 percentile). Parametric comparisons were made with t-test for two dependent groups; non-parametric comparisons were made with Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test. PASW Statistics 18 program was used for all comparisons. p<0.05 probability value was considered as statistically significant.
Comparisons of pre- and post-treatment hormone and biochemical parameters.
| Pre-treatment n=40 | Post-treatment n=40 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| FSH | 7,005(6,0825-8,24) | 7(6,195-8,265) | 0,906 |
| LH | 5,07(3,645-7,89) | 6,09(4,38-8,64) | 0,243 |
| E2 | 43,5(34,25-64,25) | 42(33,5-53,75) | 0,416 |
| Free-Testosterone | 1,79(1,35-2,35) | 1,51(1,21-2,01) | 0,024 |
| Total-Testosterone | 0,435(0,332-0,575) | 0,455(0,302-0,57) | 0,965 |
| SHBG | 39(32,25-44) | 37,5(32,5-50,75) | 0,482 |
| DHEASO4 | 197,65(160,67-274,55) | 234,6(212,07-271,17) | 0,104 |
| IGF1 | 318,9±68,51 | 313,25±85,52 | 0,737 |
| Insulin | 10,19(6,29-12,17) | 7,70(6,52-10,01) | 0,062 |
| Hemoglobin | 12,77±0,99 | 12,50±0,82 | 0,009 |
| PLT | 306,6±60,23 | 310,9±62,47 | 0,499 |
| AST | 23(19-28) | 24(20-28) | 0,275 |
| ALT | 22(19-26) | 25(21-26,75) | 0,257 |
| Triglyceride | 121,5(103,5-132) | 135(119,25-172) | <0,001 |
| Cholesterol | 133,23±20,39 | 153,32±27,32 | <0,001 |
| HDL | 38,05±6,04 | 37,48±5,72 | 0,475 |
To test the normality assumption of the data, Shapiro Wilk was used. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (25th percentile – 75 percentile). Parametric comparisons were made with t-test for two dependent groups; non-parametric comparisons were made with Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test. PASW Statistics 18 program was used for all comparisons. p<0.05 probability value was considered as statistically significant.