Literature DB >> 31080688

Highly Selective, Efficient Deoxygenative Hydrogenation of Amides Catalyzed by a Manganese Pincer Complex via Metal-Ligand Cooperation.

You-Quan Zou1, Subrata Chakraborty1, Alexander Nerush1, Dror Oren1, Yael Diskin-Posner1, Yehoshoa Ben-David1, David Milstein1.   

Abstract

Deoxygenative hydrogenation of amides to amines homogeneously catalyzed by a complex of an Earth-abundant metal is presented. This manganese-catalyzed reaction features high efficiency and selectivity. A plausible reaction mechanism, involving metal-ligand cooperation of the manganese pincer complex, is proposed based on NMR studies and relevant stoichiometric reactions.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 31080688      PMCID: PMC6503579          DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Catal            Impact factor:   13.084


Metal–ligand cooperation (MLC) is a powerful activation mode in transition-metal catalysis, which has fascinated chemists for many years.[1] It has grown into, and will continue to be, a popular and flourishing research field. In this regard, our group developed a mode of MLC involving aromatization/dearomatization by metal pincer complexes, which found broad applications in the activation of C–H, N–H, O–H, B–H, B–B, Si–H, as well as H–H bonds.[2] This novel bond activation mode enables the environmentally benign, sustainable synthesis of numerous important and useful chemicals from simple starting materials. However, in most of those reactions, complexes of precious metals are used. Currently, there is growing research interest in the development of catalytic reactions based on complexes of Earth-abundant metals.[3] In 2016, our group reported the manganese-catalyzed acceptorless dehydrogenative coupling of alcohols and amines to aldimines.[4a] Seminal works employing manganese-based pincer complexes were subsequently disclosed by the groups of Beller, Kempe, Kirchner, and others, including the dehydrogenation of alcohols[4b−4e,5] and hydrogenation of ketones,[6] esters,[4f,7] and C–N bond hydrogenolysis of amides,[8] as well as conjugate addition of nonactivated nitriles.[4g] Amine skeletons are prevalent in many biologically important natural products, pharmaceuticals, and agrochemicals. They also serve as versatile building blocks in organic synthesis, which can be easily elaborated into various fine and useful complex molecules.[9] In addition, amines are widely used as dyes, surfactants, anticorrosive agents, detergents in industrial production.[9] Given the importance of amine compounds, the development of effective protocols for their synthesis is highly desirable. In this context, deoxygenative hydrogenation (reduction) of amides (C–O bond cleavage) represents a straightforward method to access the corresponding amines.[10] Conventional methods for the deoxygenative reduction of amides to amines are largely based on the use of (over)stoichiometric amounts of reductants such as lithium aluminum hydride (LiAlH4), silanes, or boranes.[10] However, these methods suffer from the hazardous reductive agents, tedious workup procedures, and generation of a large amount of waste. To address these issues, catalytic deoxygenative reduction of amides using hydrogen as the terminal reductant, forming water, is ideal. The relatively low electrophilicity of the amide carbonyl group and the competitive C–N bond cleavage (deaminative reduction) make this transformation more challenging, compared to the hydrogenation of aldehydes, ketones, and esters. While heterogeneously catalyzed deoxygenative reduction of amides were reported,[11] they were often stricken with high pressure,[11f−11i] high temperature,[11a,11b,11f,11g] and poor selectivity.[11a,11d,11e] Only few reports of homogeneously catalyzed reaction were disclosed during the past decade (Scheme a).[12] Homogeneously catalyzed reactions are generally attractive, because of potential high selectivity and being more amenable for mechanistic understanding. In 2007, Cole-Hamilton and co-workers reported a ruthenium-triphos complex-catalyzed hydrogenation of amides to primary and secondary amines with good to excellent selectivities.[12a,12b] Later, the Klankermayer group synthesized a rationally designed ruthenium-triphos η4-trimethylenemethane complex and successfully applied it to the hydrogenation of lactams.[12c] Shortly after, similar ruthenium-based catalytic systems were disclosed by the groups of Beller[12d] and Zhou,[12e] using Yb(OTf)3·H2O and BF3·OEt2 as the additives, respectively. In addition, the Zhou group also described a selective deoxygenative hydrogenation of amides catalyzed by an iridium pincer complex, where B(C6F5)3 was used as the Lewis acid additive.[12f] Despite these advances, all the above transformations are using catalysts based on the precious metals ruthenium or iridium. The development of novel methods for the deoxygenative hydrogenation of amides without noble metals is of great importance.
Scheme 1

Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Deoxygenative Hydrogenation of Amides to Amines

As part of our ongoing research program on sustainable homogeneous catalysis, we herein report a more environmentally benign strategy for the deoxygenative hydrogenation of amides catalyzed by a pincer complex of Earth-abundant manganese (Scheme b). We envisioned that the dearomatized manganese complex 1 could heterolytically split dihydrogen via MLC, and the resulting manganese hydride will hydrogenate amides to amines with the aid of a proper Lewis acid. To the best of our knowledge, there has hitherto been no report on deoxygenative hydrogenation of amides to amines homogeneously catalyzed by a complex of a base metal. Our initial studies were focused on examining the feasibility of the deoxygenative hydrogenation of N-phenylbenzamide (2a) and optimization of the reaction conditions for the application to various amides. Encouragingly, the hydrogenation of 2a did indeed occur in the presence of the manganese PNP complex Mn-I(5e) (5 mol %), BuOK (6 mol %) and one equivalent of BPh3 under 50 bar H2 at 150 °C in m-xylene, to afford the desired product N-benzylaniline (3a) in 53% GC yield after 72 h (Table , entry 1). The transformation is highly selective and only trace amounts of the C–N bond cleavage products aniline (<1%) and benzyl alcohol (<1%) were detected by GC (see the Supporting Information for details). Control experiments indicated that without manganese complex or Lewis acid no hydrogenation reaction occurred (entries 2 and 3). Encouraged by this promising result, we started to optimize the reaction conditions to improve the conversion and yield. Two manganese PNNH complexes Mn-II(4c,4f) and Mn-III(4d) showed lower catalytic performance and produced the product in 23% and 37% yield, respectively (entries 4 and 5). Lowering the reaction temperatures led to dramatically decreased conversions and yields (entries 6 and 7). Interestingly, both conversion and yield were increased by using the stronger Lewis acid B(C6F5)3 as the additive (74% conversion and 63% yield, entry 8). Further screening the solvents indicated that dioxane and THF were not suitable reaction media, probably due to their coordination to B(C6F5)3 (entries 9 and 10). Increasing the Lewis acid loading to 1.5 equiv provided the best results: 95% conversion and 89% isolated yield of product 3a (see entry 11). Under shorter reaction time (48 h), the reaction efficiency was slightly decreased (see entry 12).
Table 1

Optimizing of the Reaction Conditionsa

entryMnBR3solventconversionb (%)yieldb (%)
1Mn-IBPh3m-xylene5353
2 BPh3m-xylene<50
3Mn-I m-xylene00
4cMn-IIBPh3m-xylene3823
5cMn-IIIBPh3m-xylene4537
6dMn-IBPh3m-xylene2624
7eMn-IBPh3m-xylene1920
8Mn-IB(C6F5)3m-xylene7463
9Mn-IB(C6F5)3dioxane2317
10Mn-IB(C6F5)3THF<10
11fMn-IB(C6F5)3m-xylene9595 (89)
12f,gMn-IB(C6F5)3m-xylene8975

Reaction conditions: 2a (0.2 mmol), Mn cat. (5 mol %), BuOK (6 mol %), Lewis acid BR3 (0.2 mmol), H2 (50 bar), and solvent (1.0 mL) at 150 °C (bath temperature) for 72 h.

Conversions and yields were determined by GC analysis using biphenyl as an internal standard; isolated yield is given in parentheses.

12 mol % of BuOK was used.

Reaction was performed at 130 °C.

Reaction was performed at 110 °C.

B(C6F5)3 (0.3 mmol) was used.

Reaction was performed for 48 h.

Reaction conditions: 2a (0.2 mmol), Mn cat. (5 mol %), BuOK (6 mol %), Lewis acid BR3 (0.2 mmol), H2 (50 bar), and solvent (1.0 mL) at 150 °C (bath temperature) for 72 h. Conversions and yields were determined by GC analysis using biphenyl as an internal standard; isolated yield is given in parentheses. 12 mol % of BuOK was used. Reaction was performed at 130 °C. Reaction was performed at 110 °C. B(C6F5)3 (0.3 mmol) was used. Reaction was performed for 48 h. Next, we selected the conditions of entry 11 to examine the generality of this catalytic hydrogenation system by evaluating a variety of amides. As highlighted in Table , benzamides bearing substituents of different electronic nature on the N-phenyl group were applicable to this reaction, and the corresponding secondary amines 3a-3f were obtained in good to excellent isolated yields (Table , entries 1–6). The hydrogenation of N-benzyl-, cyclohexyl-, and hexyl-benzamides in 2g–2i also proceeded smoothly to give the desired products in good yields (68%–83% yields, entries 7–9). Aliphatic N-phenyl amides such as N-phenylacetamide (2j), N-phenylpropionamide (2k) and N-phenylisobutyramide (2l) were compatible with the optimal conditions, furnishing the products 3j–3l in 52%–70% isolated yields (entries 10–12). Notably, the lactams 2-pyrrolidinone (2m) and 2-piperidinone (2n) were also suitable substrates, and good results were observed (entries 13 and 14). Deoxygenation of formamides resulted in low yields (see the SI for details). In order to further extend the substrate scope, we evaluated the reaction of the tertiary amide 2o; deoxygenative hydrogenation also occurred to give the fully aliphatic tertiary amine 3o, albeit in lower conversion (47%) and yield (21%) (entry 15). Significantly, all the reactions selectively gave the C–O bond cleavage products.
Table 2

Deoxygenative Hydrogenation of Amides 2 to Amines 3 Catalyzed by Mn-I

Reaction conditions: 2 (0.2 mmol), Mn-I (5 mol %), BuOK (6 mol %), B(C6F5)3 (0.3 mmol), H2 (50 bar), and m-xylene (1.0 mL) at 150 °C (bath temperature) for 72 h.

Conversions were determined by GC analysis using biphenyl as an internal standard.

Yields of isolated products after flash chromatography.

Yields were determined by GC analysis using biphenyl as an internal standard.

Reaction conditions: 2 (0.2 mmol), Mn-I (5 mol %), BuOK (6 mol %), n class="Chemical">B(C6F5)3 (0.3 mmol), H2 (50 bar), and m-xylene (1.0 mL) at 150 °C (bath temperature) for 72 h. Conversions were determined by GC analysis using biphenyl as an internal standard. Yields of isolated products after flash chromatography. Yields were determined by GC analysis using biphenyl as an internal standard. In order to get some insight into the mechanism of this transformation, we first treated complex Mn-I with 1.2 equiv of BuOK at room temperature in THF, upon which the transparent yellow solution immediately changed to a dark brown homogeneous solution (Scheme b; see SI for details) and two sharp AB doublets appeared at δ = 81.03 (2JP–P = 79.9 Hz) and 68.04 (2JP–P = 79.9 Hz) ppm in the 31P NMR (THF as the solvent), attributable to complex 1 (Scheme a).[13] Recrystallization of 1 gave the new N2-bridged dinuclear manganese complex 5 (N2 is from the glovebox), the only example of a dearomatized N2-bridged complex (Scheme a). The bond lengths of C6–C7 and C27–C28 are 1.385 and 1.384 Å, respectively, which clearly indicate double-bond characters.[14]
Scheme 2

(a) Dearomatization of Mn-I, Activation of H2 by Complex 1, and Related X-ray Crystal Structures and (b) 31P NMR Spectra

On the other hand, upon treatment of the above reaction mixture with 1 atm dihydrogen, an orange solution was formed (Scheme b), generating the new hydride complex 4, as indicated by the 31P{1H} NMR spectrum in THF, which exhibited a singlet at δ = 111.77 ppm (see the SI for details), and the 1H NMR spectrum exhibited a hydride resonance at δ = −4.34 ppm (t, 2JP–H = 48.5 Hz). The IR spectrum of 4 showed two strong absorption bands at 1878.4 (νasym) and 1804.0 cm–1 (νsym). The structure of complex 4 was further confirmed by X-ray crystal analysis.[14] Importantly, when complex 4 was employed as catalyst for the hydrogenation of amide 2a, full conversion was observed and the product 3a was isolated in 91% yield (see Scheme ).
Scheme 3

Deoxygenative Hydrogenation of Amide 2a Catalyzed by Complex 4

We also examined the manganese complex Mn-I catalyzed hydrogenation of the imine N-benzylideneaniline 6.[15] As shown in Table , the hydrogenation of 6 did occur under the above optimal hydrogenation conditions, without Lewis acid, resulting in 60% conversion within 24 h and the amine 3a was isolated in 51% yield (Table , entry 1). Prolonging the reaction time to 72 h, the conversion was increased to 80% (entry 2). When 0.2 equiv of B(C6F5)3 was used, the reaction reached 88% conversion within 48 h (entry 3). Increasing the loading of B(C6F5)3 to 0.5 equiv, 100% conversion was recorded and the desired product was isolated in 81% yield (entry 4). These results indicate that imine 6 could be an intermediate in the hydrogenation of amide 2a, and Lewis acid may also accelerate the hydrogenation of the imine.[16]
Table 3

Hydrogenation of Imine 6 Catalyzed by Mn-I

entryaB(C6F5)3t (h)conversionb (%)isolated yieldc (%)
1 246051
2 728072
30.2 equiv488883
40.5 equiv4810081

Reaction conditions: 6 (0.2 mmol), Mn-I (5 mol %), BuOK (6 mol %), H2 (50 bar), and m-xylene (1.0 mL) at 150 °C (bath temperature).

Conversions were determined by GC analysis using biphenyl as an internal standard.

Yields of isolated products after flash chromatography.

Reaction conditions: 6 (0.2 mmol), Mn-I (5 mol %), BuOK (6 mol %), n class="Chemical">H2 (50 bar), and m-xylene (1.0 mL) at 150 °C (bath temperature). Conversions were determined by GC analysis using biphenyl as an internal standard. Yields of isolated products after flash chromatography. Based on our experimental results and previous work, we propose a possible reaction mechanism for the Mn-catalyzed deoxygenative hydrogenation of amides. As we have shown, in the presence of BuOK, the pincer complex Mn-I undergoes deprotonation to give the dearomatized complex 1, which is very likely the actual catalyst (Scheme ). Subsequently, complex 1 heterolytically splits dihydrogen by MLC, generating the aromatized complex 4. The carbonyl group of the Lewis acid activated amide 7 then may electrophilically attack the Mn–H moiety of the coordinatively saturated 4 through an outer-sphere pathway, leading to formation of the hemiaminal intermediate 9 via transition state 8.[17] Later, the Lewis-acid-assisted dehydration of 9 occurs to produce imine 6, accompanied by the regeneration of the dearomatized complex 1.[18] Once imine 6 is formed, it may react with the hydride complex 4 to afford intermediate 11 through transition state 10 via a similar outer-sphere process.[16] At last, elimination of the desired product 3a from 11 releases the complex 1, which then re-enters the catalytic cycle.
Scheme 4

Proposed Reaction Mechanism for Manganese-Catalyzed Deoxygenative Hydrogenation of Amides to Amines

In conclusion, we have developed the first Earth-abundant-based metal complex for homogeneously catalyzed deoxygenative hydrogenation of amides to amines. This synthetically important, highly selective C–O bond cleavage reaction is catalyzed by a dearomatized pincer complex of manganese. A plausible catalytic cycle, involving metal–ligand cooperation, is supported by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies, stoichiometric reactions, X-ray crystallography, and isolation of plausible intermediates. Further detailed mechanistic investigations and applications of this methodology are underway in our laboratory, and will be reported in due course.
  11 in total

1.  Utilizing Design of Experiments Approach to Assess Kinetic Parameters for a Mn Homogeneous Hydrogenation Catalyst.

Authors:  Robin K A van Schendel; Wenjun Yang; Evgeny A Uslamin; Evgeny A Pidko
Journal:  ChemCatChem       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 5.497

2.  Basic Promotors Impact Thermodynamics and Catalyst Speciation in Homogeneous Carbonyl Hydrogenation.

Authors:  Wenjun Yang; Tejas Y Kalavalapalli; Annika M Krieger; Taras A Khvorost; Ivan Yu Chernyshov; Manuela Weber; Evgeny A Uslamin; Evgeny A Pidko; Georgy A Filonenko
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 16.383

3.  Manganese-Catalyzed Hydrogenation of Ketones under Mild and Base-free Conditions.

Authors:  Stefan Weber; Julian Brünig; Luis F Veiros; Karl Kirchner
Journal:  Organometallics       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Robust and efficient hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds catalysed by mixed donor Mn(I) pincer complexes.

Authors:  Wenjun Yang; Ivan Yu Chernyshov; Robin K A van Schendel; Manuela Weber; Christian Müller; Georgy A Filonenko; Evgeny A Pidko
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Chemoselective Hydrogenation of Nitroarenes Using an Air-Stable Base-Metal Catalyst.

Authors:  Viktoriia Zubar; Abhishek Dewanji; Magnus Rueping
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 6.005

6.  Catalytic Hydrogenation of Thioesters, Thiocarbamates, and Thioamides.

Authors:  Jie Luo; Michael Rauch; Liat Avram; Yehoshoa Ben-David; David Milstein
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Preparation of Metal-Immobilized Methacrylate-Based Monolithic Columns for Flow-Through Cross-Coupling Reactions.

Authors:  Akhmad Sabarudin; Shin Shu; Kazuhiro Yamamoto; Tomonari Umemura
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Mimicking transition metals in borrowing hydrogen from alcohols.

Authors:  Ananya Banik; Jasimuddin Ahmed; Swagata Sil; Swadhin K Mandal
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 9.825

9.  Selective Carbanion-Pyridine Coordination of a Reactive P,N Ligand to RhI.

Authors:  Marc Devillard; Andreas Ehlers; Maxime A Siegler; Jarl Ivar van der Vlugt
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 5.236

Review 10.  Homogeneous and heterogeneous catalytic reduction of amides and related compounds using molecular hydrogen.

Authors:  Jose R Cabrero-Antonino; Rosa Adam; Veronica Papa; Matthias Beller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.