Background and aims: The symptom-based diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have recently been revised in the Rome IV consensus. On the other hand, with rising public awareness of IBS, self-diagnosis and self-management is also increasing. We compared the prevalence and impact of Rome IV-based IBS vs self-diagnosed IBS in the general population. Methods: An internet panel filled out an online survey on bowel symptoms and their impact on health care utilization and daily activities. Results: A representative internet panel of 1012 individuals completed the online survey. Bowel symptoms were present in 68.6% of the population. Of these, 21% consulted a physician for these symptoms in the last year and 42% earlier. Rome IV IBS criteria were fulfilled by 5.5%, and these were younger and more likely to be female. In this subset, 37% had consulted a physician for IBS symptoms in the preceding year and 29% had done so earlier. A colonoscopy had been performed in 22%. Based on a brief description, 17.6% of the population self-identified as suffering from IBS (p < 0.001 compared to Rome IV IBS prevalence), and these were more likely to be female. Concordance with the Rome IV criteria was only 25%, but except for a lower reporting of pain, the symptom pattern, severity, impact on daily life, inability to work and health care utilization were similar to the Rome IV group. A total of 134 days of absence from work were attributed to bowel symptoms in those self-reporting with IBS. Conclusion: In the general population, bowel symptoms are highly prevalent, and the self-reported "IBS" is three times more prevalent than according to Rome IV criteria. Self-reported IBS is associated with a similar impact on health care utilization and quality of life but a higher impact on absence from work.
Background and aims: The symptom-based diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have recently been revised in the Rome IV consensus. On the other hand, with rising public awareness of IBS, self-diagnosis and self-management is also increasing. We compared the prevalence and impact of Rome IV-based IBS vs self-diagnosed IBS in the general population. Methods: An internet panel filled out an online survey on bowel symptoms and their impact on health care utilization and daily activities. Results: A representative internet panel of 1012 individuals completed the online survey. Bowel symptoms were present in 68.6% of the population. Of these, 21% consulted a physician for these symptoms in the last year and 42% earlier. Rome IV IBS criteria were fulfilled by 5.5%, and these were younger and more likely to be female. In this subset, 37% had consulted a physician for IBS symptoms in the preceding year and 29% had done so earlier. A colonoscopy had been performed in 22%. Based on a brief description, 17.6% of the population self-identified as suffering from IBS (p < 0.001 compared to Rome IV IBS prevalence), and these were more likely to be female. Concordance with the Rome IV criteria was only 25%, but except for a lower reporting of pain, the symptom pattern, severity, impact on daily life, inability to work and health care utilization were similar to the Rome IV group. A total of 134 days of absence from work were attributed to bowel symptoms in those self-reporting with IBS. Conclusion: In the general population, bowel symptoms are highly prevalent, and the self-reported "IBS" is three times more prevalent than according to Rome IV criteria. Self-reported IBS is associated with a similar impact on health care utilization and quality of life but a higher impact on absence from work.
Entities:
Keywords:
Epidemiology; health care resource utilization; irritable bowel syndrome; medication use; sick leave
Authors: L Vork; Z Z R M Weerts; Z Mujagic; J W Kruimel; M A M Hesselink; J W M Muris; D Keszthelyi; D M A E Jonkers; A A M Masclee Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Emma P Halmos; Victoria A Power; Susan J Shepherd; Peter R Gibson; Jane G Muir Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: George F Longstreth; W Grant Thompson; William D Chey; Lesley A Houghton; Fermin Mearin; Robin C Spiller Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Paul Moayyedi; Fermín Mearin; Fernando Azpiroz; Viola Andresen; Giovanni Barbara; Maura Corsetti; Anton Emmanuel; A Pali S Hungin; Peter Layer; Vincenzo Stanghellini; Peter Whorwell; Frank Zerbib; Jan Tack Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Zsa Zsa R M Weerts; Lisa Vork; Zlatan Mujagic; Daniel Keszthelyi; Martine A M Hesselink; Joanna Kruimel; Carsten Leue; Jean W M Muris; Daisy M A E Jonkers; Ad A M Masclee Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Asbjørn M Drewes; Anne E Olesen; Adam D Farmer; Eva Szigethy; Vinciane Rebours; Søren S Olesen Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Christopher V Almario; Samuel Eberlein; Carine Khalil; Brennan M R Spiegel Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 3.598