Literature DB >> 31079884

The mechanical behavior of high-translucent monolithic zirconia after adjustment and finishing procedures and artificial aging.

Gabriel Rodrigues Hatanaka1, Gabriela Scatimburgo Polli1, Gelson Luis Adabo2.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: How occlusal adjustments and finishing of high-translucent monolithic zirconia restorations affect their mechanical behavior is unclear.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of grinding, finishing, and hydrothermal degradation on the roughness, flexural strength, and reliability of fully stabilized zirconia (FSZ) and partially stabilized zirconia (PSZ) for monolithic restorations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Specimens of PSZ and FSZ were divided into 5 groups: control (Ctrl); those ground by using coarse diamond rotary instrument (Gr); those that underwent grinding, polishing (diamond rubber), and glazing (GrPolGl); those that underwent grinding and glazing (GrGl); and those that underwent grinding and polishing (GrPol). These groups were subdivided into nonaged and hydrothermally aged in autoclave (134 °C, 200 kPa). Three-point bend tests (flexural strength [FS]) were performed (n=30), and roughness (Ra) was measured by using a contact profilometer (n=30). The Weibull moduli were obtained from the FS data. The intergroup FS was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test and Student-Newman-Keuls method, and the intragroup FS, Mann-Whitney tests (α=.05).
RESULTS: The median FS for PSZ (MPa) for the aforementioned groups is as follows: Gr (1147.8)=GrPol (1210.3)>GrPolGl (815.6)>GrGl (569.7)=Ctrl (583.0). The FS for FSZ (MPa) for the aforementioned groups is as follows: GrPolGl (404.2)=GrGl (427.0)<Ctrl (484.8)=Gr (435.9)=GrPol (443.7). Grinding led to high roughness values. The Weibull modulus was most influenced by glaze treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Monolithic zirconia exhibited a different mechanical behavior after adjustment procedures and hydrothermal aging. Grinding increased the roughness, and polishing reduced the roughness of the ground surface. FS improvement by finishing depended on the type of zirconia. Glazing smoothened the surface but tended to decrease the FS. Aging of PSZ improved the FS except in the control and glazed groups, whereas FSZ was not affected by aging, except in the GrGl group.
Copyright © 2019 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31079884     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  4 in total

1.  Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and aging on topography, C. albicans adherence, and flexural strength of ultra-translucent zirconia: an in situ study.

Authors:  Isabelle Helena Gurgel de Carvalho; Nathalia Ramos da Silva; Taciana Emília Leite Vila-Nova; Leopoldina de Fatima Dantas de Almeida; Aretha Heitor Veríssimo; Renata Marques de Melo; Yu Zhang; Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E Souza
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Evaluating the Effect of Different Polymer and Composite Abutments on the Color Accuracy of Multilayer Pre-Colored Zirconia Polycrystal Dental Prosthesis.

Authors:  Wen-Chieh Hsu; Tzu-Yu Peng; Chien-Ming Kang; Fan-Yi Chao; Jian-Hong Yu; Su-Feng Chen
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.967

3.  3-D Surface Morphological Characterization of CAD/CAM Milled Dental Zirconia: An In Vitro Study of the Effect of Post-Fabrication Processes.

Authors:  Ashwini Patil; Davidson Jebaseelan
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Translucency and mechanical behavior of  partially stabilized monolithic zirconia after staining, finishing procedures and artificial aging.

Authors:  Allan Oliveira da Silva; Lívia Fiorin; Adriana Claudia Lapria Faria; Ricardo Faria Ribeiro; Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.