Literature DB >> 31079652

Comparing wasted apples and oranges: An assessment of methods to measure household food waste.

Erica van Herpen1, Ivo A van der Lans2, Nancy Holthuysen3, Mariska Nijenhuis-de Vries3, Tom E Quested4.   

Abstract

Food waste has become a global concern in recent years, especially the household food waste that is generated in the developed world. Multiple methods to measure household food waste have been proposed, but little is known about their validity. Five methods are selected and investigated empirically: survey questions about general food waste over a non-specified period of time, diaries, photo coding, kitchen caddies, and pre-announced survey questions regarding a specific time period. In an experiment, respondents were asked to assess their food waste using some or all of these methods depending on condition. Overall, the general survey questions appear to be less valid, as these lead to large underestimation of the level of food waste, low variance in reported food waste across households compared to the other methods, and low correlations with other measures. The other four methods are relatively highly correlated. A survey about food waste in the past week appears to be a useful method for large-scale measurements to differentiate households according to the amount of food waste each produces, although it should be noted that this method underestimates the amount of food waste. Kitchen caddies and photo coding seem to be valid methods and, for small samples, provide alternatives to food diaries, which have been more commonly used.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caddy; Consumer; Diary; Photo; Survey; Waste

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31079652     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  6 in total

1.  A Randomized Controlled Trial to Address Consumer Food Waste with a Technology-aided Tailored Sustainability Intervention.

Authors:  Brian E Roe; Danyi Qi; Robbie A Beyl; Karissa E Neubig; John W Apolzan; Corby K Martin
Journal:  Resour Conserv Recycl       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 10.204

2.  The quantity and composition of household food waste during the COVID-19 pandemic: A direct measurement study in Canada.

Authors:  Haley Everitt; Paul van der Werf; Jamie A Seabrook; Alexander Wray; Jason A Gilliland
Journal:  Socioecon Plann Sci       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.641

Review 3.  Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on household food waste behaviour: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mohammad Iranmanesh; Morteza Ghobakhloo; Mehrbakhsh Nilashi; Ming-Lang Tseng; Madugoda Gunaratnege Senali; Ghazanfar Ali Abbasi
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 5.016

4.  Consumer Behaviour and Food Waste: Understanding and Mitigating Waste with a Technology Probe.

Authors:  Eliot Jones-Garcia; Serafim Bakalis; Martin Flintham
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-11

5.  The Proof Is in the Pudding: Using a Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Long-Term Effectiveness of a Household Food Waste Reduction Intervention During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Haley Everitt; Paul van der Werf; Jamie A Seabrook; Jason A Gilliland
Journal:  Circ Econ Sustain       Date:  2022-08-03

6.  Food waste in Italian households during the Covid-19 pandemic: a self-reporting approach.

Authors:  Vera Amicarelli; Christian Bux
Journal:  Food Secur       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 7.141

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.