Literature DB >> 31079257

Tumor growth patterns on magnetic resonance imaging and treatment outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy.

Shintaro Tsuruoka1,2, Masaaki Kataoka3, Yasushi Hamamoto4, Akifumi Tokumasu5, Kotaro Uwatsu3, Hiromitsu Kanzaki3, Noriko Takata4, Hirofumi Ishikawa4, Ayaka Ouchi4, Teruhito Mochizuki4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the prognostic value of tumor growth patterns on magnetic resonance (MR) images in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated with definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (RT/CCRT).
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 102 patients with LACC who received definitive RT/CCRT and who underwent MR imaging before RT/CCRT. Growth patterns on pretreatment T2-weighted MR images were classified into expansive or infiltrative type according to tumor morphologic patterns in the myometrium and/or parametrial space.
RESULTS: The median age was 60 years (range 26-90 years). The median follow-up time was 47.7 months (range 5.7-123 months). The numbers of patients with stages IB, II, III, and IVA were 17, 39, 43, and 3, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates for stages IB, II, III, and IV were 87%, 76%, 74%, and 67%, respectively. Regarding growth patterns on MR images, 31 were of expansive type and 71 were of infiltrative type. The infiltrative type was significantly associated with lower OS and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) than the expansive type (3-year OS, 70% vs. 93%, p = 0.003; 3-year LRRFS, 64% vs. 94%, p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, infiltrative tumor growth patterns were a significant independent factor for low OS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-16.7; p = 0.015) and low LRRFS (HR, 4.27; 95% CI 1.43-18.5; p = 0.007).
CONCLUSION: Tumor growth patterns on MR images could be an indicator of survival and locoregional control in patients with LACC treated with definitive RT/CCRT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; MRI; Radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31079257     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01457-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  26 in total

1.  Long-term results of high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Takashi Nakano; Shingo Kato; Tatsuya Ohno; Hirohiko Tsujii; Shinichiro Sato; Kenjiro Fukuhisa; Tatsuo Arai
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; Constantine Gatsonis; Dennis S Chi; Marco A Amendola; Kathy Brandt; Lawrence H Schwartz; Susan Koelliker; Evan S Siegelman; Jeffrey J Brown; Robert B McGhee; Revathy Iyer; Kenneth M Vitellas; Bradley Snyder; Harry J Long; James V Fiorica; Donald G Mitchell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Significance of tumor volume and corpus uteri invasion in cervical cancer patients treated by radiotherapy.

Authors:  K Narayan; R Fisher; D Bernshaw
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Tumor diameter/volume and pelvic node status assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for uterine cervical cancer treated with irradiation.

Authors:  T Toita; Y Kakinohana; S Shinzato; K Ogawa; M Yoshinaga; S Iraha; M Higashi; K Sakumoto; K Kanazawa; S Sawada
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer.

Authors:  H C Wagenaar; J B Trimbos; S Postema; A Anastasopoulou; R J van der Geest; J H Reiber; G G Kenter; A A Peters; P M Pattynama
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Prognostic difference of surgical treatment of exophytic versus barrel-shaped bulky cervical cancer.

Authors:  J B Trimbos; A F Lambeek; A A W Peters; R Wolterbeek; K N Gaarenstroom; G J Fleuren; G G Kenter
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  The validity of tumour diameter assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and gross specimen with regard to tumour volume in cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Dae Chul Jung; Woong Ju; Hyuck Jae Choi; Sokbom Kang; Sohee Park; Chong Woo Yoo; Sang-Yoon Park
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01.

Authors:  Patricia J Eifel; Kathryn Winter; Mitchell Morris; Charles Levenback; Perry W Grigsby; Jay Cooper; Marvin Rotman; David Gershenson; David G Mutch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Five years' experience treating locally advanced cervical cancer with concurrent chemoradiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy: results from a single institution.

Authors:  Kate Parker; Eve Gallop-Evans; Louise Hanna; Malcolm Adams
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Prognostic assessment of tumor regression after external irradiation for cervical cancer.

Authors:  J H Hong; M S Chen; F J Lin; S G Tang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.