Literature DB >> 31079073

Academic, behavioural and quality of life outcomes of slight to mild hearing loss in late childhood: a population-based study.

Jing Wang1,2, Jon Quach1,3, Valerie Sung1,4, Peter Carew5,6, Ben Edwards7, Anneke Grobler1,2, Lisa Gold1,8, Melissa Wake1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations of hearing thresholds and slight to mild hearing loss with academic, behavioural and quality of life outcomes in children at a population level.
METHODS: Design and participants:children aged 11-12 years in the population-based cross-sectional Child Health CheckPoint study within the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. Audiometry:mean hearing threshold across 1, 2 and 4 kHz (better and worse ear); slight/mild hearing loss (threshold of 16-40 decibels hearing loss (dB HL)). Outcomes: National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy, language, teacher-reported learning, parent and teacher reported behaviour and self-reported quality of life. Analysis:linear regression quantified associations of hearing threshold/loss with outcomes.
RESULTS: Of 1483 children (mean age 11.5 years), 9.2% and 13.1% had slight/mild bilateral and unilateral hearing loss, respectively. Per SD increment in better ear threshold (5.7 dB HL), scores were worse on several academic outcomes (eg, reading 0.11 SD, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.16), parent-reported behaviour (0.06 SD, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.11) and physical (0.09 SD, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.14) and psychosocial (0.06 SD, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.11) Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). Compared with normally hearing children, children with bilateral slight/mild losses scored 0.2-0.3 SDs lower in sentence repetition, teacher-reported learning and physical PedsQL but not other outcomes. Similar but attenuated patterns were seen in unilateral slight/mild losses.
CONCLUSIONS: Hearing thresholds and slight/mild hearing loss showed small but important associations with some child outcomes at 11-12 years. Justifying hearing screening or intervention at this age would require better understanding of its longitudinal and indirect effects, alongside effective management and appropriate early identification programmes. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescent health; deafness; outcomes research

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31079073     DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-316917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  3 in total

1.  [Follow-up II of newborn hearing screening : Evaluation of a follow-up II facility after implementation of newborn hearing screening in Germany].

Authors:  Nicola Fink; Almut Goeze; Eugen Zaretsky; Anna Fink; Katrin Reimann; Christiane Hey
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  The Feasibility and Reliability of a Digits-in-Noise Test in the Clinical Follow-Up of Children With Mild to Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Jantien Vroegop; Marian Rodenburg-Vlot; André Goedegebure; Agnes Doorduin; Nienke Homans; Marc van der Schroeff
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Predicting Quality of Life and Behavior and Emotion from Functional Auditory and Pragmatic Language Abilities in 9-Year-Old Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Linda Cupples; Greg Leigh; Sanna Hou; Angela Wong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.