| Literature DB >> 31078937 |
Meghdoot Mozumder1, Jose M Pozo2, Santiago Coelho2, Marina Costantini3, Julie Simpson4, J Robin Highley4, Paul G Ince4, Alejandro F Frangi5.
Abstract
White matter lesions represent a major risk factor for dementia in elderly people. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) studies have demonstrated cerebral blood flow reduction in age-related white matter lesions, indicating that vascular alterations are involved in developing white matter lesions. Hypoperfusion and changes in capillary morphology are generally linked to dementia. However, a quantitative study describing these microvascular alterations in white matter lesions is missing in the literature; most previous microvascular studies being on the cortex. The aim of this work is to identify and quantify capillary microstructural changes involved in the appearance of deep subcortical lesions (DSCL). We characterize the distribution of capillary diameter, thickness, and density in the deep white matter in a population of 75 elderly subjects, stratified into three equal groups according to DSCL: Control (subject without DSCL), Lesion (sample presenting DSCL), and Normal Appearing White Matter (NAWM, the subject presented DSCL but not at the sampled tissue location). Tissue samples were selected from the Cognitive Function and Aging Study (CFAS), a cohort representative of an aging population, from which immunohistochemically-labeled histological images were acquired. To accurately estimate capillary diameters and thicknesses from the 2D histological images, we also introduce a novel semi-automatic method robust to non-perpendicular incidence angle of capillaries into the imaging plane, and to non-circular deformations of capillary cross sections. Subjects with DSCL presented a significant increase in capillary wall thickness, a decrease in the diameter intra-subject variability (but not in the mean), and a decrease in capillary density. No significant difference was observed between controls and NAWM. Both capillary wall thickening and reduction in capillary density contribute to the reduction of cerebral blood flow previously reported for white matter lesions. The obtained distributions provide reliable statistics of capillary microstructure useful to inform the modeling of human cerebral blood flow, for instance to define microcirculation models for their estimation from MRI or to perform realistic cerebral blood flow simulations.Entities:
Keywords: Capillary microstructure; Deep subcortical lesion; Deep white matter; Vascular dementia
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31078937 PMCID: PMC6514265 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101839
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Previous studies on cerebral capillary characteristics and their changes in aging and dementia.
| Ref. | Region | #Subjects (Age) | Condition | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | C | 34 (19–94) | Aging | Diameter(˄) |
| ( | C | 25 (26–96) | Aging | Diameter(−), Density(˅) |
| AD | Diameter(˄), Density(˅) | |||
| ( | C | 8 (50–65) | AD | Thickness(˄), Tortuosity(˄) |
| ( | C | 30 (54–95) | AD | Thickness(˄), Collagen fraction(˅) |
| ( | C | 20 (63–87) | AD | Thickness(˄) |
| PD | Thickness(˄) | |||
| ( | C | 5 (n/a) | AD | Thickness(˄) |
| ( | C,CA1 | 19 (82–101) | AD | Diameter(˅), Density(˅) |
| ( | C,H | 22 (23–92) | AD | Density(˅), Tortuosity(˄) |
| ( | H | 15 (21–94) | Aging | Diameter(˄), Density(˅) |
| AD | Diameter(−), Density(−) | |||
| ( | PWM | 14 (40–90) | Aging | Thickness(˄), Density(−) |
| ( | PWM,DSCL | 19 (≥65) | Aging | Density(−) |
Changes with the mentioned condition are marked as increase (˄), decrease (˅) or no change (−). Abbreviations: C = cortex, H = hippocampus, PWM = periventricular white matter, PD = Parkinson's disease. Ages are in years.
Fig. 1Identification and isolation of capillaries from a typical immunohistochemically-labeled histological image from a brain tissue sample. The tissue sample is from an ex-vivo brain of a female 91 year old, taken from the posterior most limit of the occipital horn of the lateral ventricle. A zoom of the image is shown (middle) with the resulting individual capillaries identified after segmentation (right).
Fig. 2Example of the original image of one capillary and the corresponding fitting obtained by each of the three tested methods.
Fig. 3An example of the simulated images of individual capillaries used for testing the performance of methods 1–3, and the errors obtained for each in estimating orientation (deviation angle in degrees), diameter and thickness (relative error). The significant differences between the methods (assessed by the Wilcoxon rank sum test) are indicated with star symbols: * for p ≤ 0.05, ** for p ≤ 0.001 and *** for p ≤ 10−5.
Fig. 4Distribution of lumen diameters and BM thickness of individual capillaries estimated for each of the 3 population groups from 25 CTRL, 25 NAWM and 25 DSCL cases. The distributions include intra- and inter-subject variability.
Fig. 5Distribution of the subject-specific means and intra-subject variability of lumen diameter and BM thickness, and distribution of capillary density and collagen area fraction on the white matter surface cut. They are stratified according to the groups CTRL, NAWM, and DSCL. Each group displayed here has 25 samples of the parameters, obtained from the 25 subjects of each type. Significant differences between groups (Wilcoxon rank sum test) are indicated with star symbols: * for p ≤ 0.05 and ** for p ≤ 0.001.
Statistics of 25 CTRL, 25 NAWM and 25 DSCL subjects. Diameters and thickness are expressed in μm, capillary density in mm−2, and area fraction in %.
| CTRL | NAWM | DSCL | Global | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumen diameter | Mean | 6.26 | 6.41 | 6.55 | 6.41 |
| Intra-Subj. std | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.38 | 1.46 | |
| Inter-Subj. std | 0.60 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.56 | |
| Total std | 1.60 | 1.58 | 1.44 | 1.59 | |
| BM thickness | Mean | 1.47 | 1.45 | 1.57 | 1.50 |
| Intra-Subj. std | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.72 | |
| Inter-Subj. std | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.13 | |
| Total std | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.74 | |
| Capillary density | Mean | 39.9 | 46.7 | 33.0 | 39.9 |
| Inter-Subj. std | 12.3 | 24.2 | 18.6 | 19.6 | |
| Collagen area fraction | Mean | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| Inter-Subj std | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.27 |