Amani A Fawzi1, Alaa E Fayed2, Robert A Linsenmeier3, Jing Gao2, Fei Yu4. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Ophthalmology, Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt. Electronic address: afawzimd@gmail.com. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. 4. Department of Biostatistics, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the macular microvascular changes in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) following panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). DESIGN: Using optical coherence tomographic angiography (OCTA), we prospectively studied 10 eyes of 10 subjects with high-risk PDR immediately before, at 1 month, and at 3-6 months following PRP, using a 3- × 3-mm OCTA scan at each visit. METHODS: The following parameters were calculated for the superficial (SCP), middle (MCP), and deep capillary plexuses (DCP): parafoveal vessel density (VD), adjusted flow index (AFI), and percent area of nonperfusion (PAN). Parafoveal SCP vessel-length density (VLD) was also evaluated. We performed univariate and multivariable statistics, adjusting for age and signal strength. To model the hemodynamic effect of PRP, we also present a mathematical model based on electrical circuits. RESULTS: We found no significant difference for the vascular density parameters following PRP, except for decreased density at the MCP at the latest timepoint in the adjusted multivariable model. PAN, a metric of nonperfusion adjusted for noise, and AFI, a surrogate metric of blood flow, showed significant increases at all capillary levels in the adjusted model. Our mathematical model explained how PRP would increase macular blood flow. CONCLUSIONS: Using OCTA, we found an overall increase in the flow metrics of all capillary layers in the macula following PRP, unrelated to macular edema or thickening, in line with the mathematical model. Our results suggest an overall redistribution of blood flow to the posterior pole following PRP, adding a new dimension to our understanding of the complex biologic effects of PRP in PDR. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the macular microvascular changes in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) following panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). DESIGN: Using optical coherence tomographic angiography (OCTA), we prospectively studied 10 eyes of 10 subjects with high-risk PDR immediately before, at 1 month, and at 3-6 months following PRP, using a 3- × 3-mm OCTA scan at each visit. METHODS: The following parameters were calculated for the superficial (SCP), middle (MCP), and deep capillary plexuses (DCP): parafoveal vessel density (VD), adjusted flow index (AFI), and percent area of nonperfusion (PAN). Parafoveal SCP vessel-length density (VLD) was also evaluated. We performed univariate and multivariable statistics, adjusting for age and signal strength. To model the hemodynamic effect of PRP, we also present a mathematical model based on electrical circuits. RESULTS: We found no significant difference for the vascular density parameters following PRP, except for decreased density at the MCP at the latest timepoint in the adjusted multivariable model. PAN, a metric of nonperfusion adjusted for noise, and AFI, a surrogate metric of blood flow, showed significant increases at all capillary levels in the adjusted model. Our mathematical model explained how PRP would increase macular blood flow. CONCLUSIONS: Using OCTA, we found an overall increase in the flow metrics of all capillary layers in the macula following PRP, unrelated to macular edema or thickening, in line with the mathematical model. Our results suggest an overall redistribution of blood flow to the posterior pole following PRP, adding a new dimension to our understanding of the complex biologic effects of PRP in PDR. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.
Authors: Peter L Nesper; Philipp K Roberts; Alex C Onishi; Haitao Chai; Lei Liu; Lee M Jampol; Amani A Fawzi Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jonathan F Russell; Hasenin Al-Khersan; Yingying Shi; Nathan L Scott; John W Hinkle; Kenneth C Fan; Cancan Lyu; William J Feuer; Giovanni Gregori; Philip J Rosenfeld Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-03-13 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Mohamed Ashraf; Konstantina Sampani; Allen Clermont; Omar Abu-Qamar; Jae Rhee; Paolo S Silva; Lloyd Paul Aiello; Jennifer K Sun Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Bingyao Tan; Jacqueline Chua; Emily Lin; Joyce Cheng; Alfred Gan; Xinwen Yao; Damon W K Wong; Charumathi Sabanayagam; Doric Wong; Choi Mun Chan; Tien Yin Wong; Leopold Schmetterer; Gavin S Tan Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-01-03