| Literature DB >> 31077928 |
Hannah Weigand1, Arne J Beermann2, Fedor Čiampor3, Filipe O Costa4, Zoltán Csabai5, Sofia Duarte6, Matthias F Geiger7, Michał Grabowski8, Frédéric Rimet9, Björn Rulik10, Malin Strand11, Nikolaus Szucsich12, Alexander M Weigand13, Endre Willassen14, Sofia A Wyler15, Agnès Bouchez16, Angel Borja17, Zuzana Čiamporová-Zaťovičová18, Sónia Ferreira19, Klaas-Douwe B Dijkstra20, Ursula Eisendle21, Jörg Freyhof22, Piotr Gadawski23, Wolfram Graf24, Arne Haegerbaeumer25, Berry B van der Hoorn26, Bella Japoshvili27, Lujza Keresztes28, Emre Keskin29, Florian Leese30, Jan N Macher31, Tomasz Mamos32, Guy Paz33, Vladimir Pešić34, Daniela Maric Pfannkuchen35, Martin Andreas Pfannkuchen36, Benjamin W Price37, Buki Rinkevich38, Marcos A L Teixeira39, Gábor Várbíró40, Torbjørn Ekrem41.
Abstract
Effective identification of species using short DNA fragments (DNA barcoding and DNA metabarcoding) requires reliable sequence reference libraries of known taxa. Both taxonomically comprehensive coverage and content quality are important for sufficient accuracy. For aquatic ecosystems in Europe, reliable barcode reference libraries are particularly important if molecular identification tools are to be implemented in biomonitoring and reports in the context of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). We analysed gaps in the two most important reference databases, Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD) and NCBI GenBank, with a focus on the taxa most frequently used in WFD and MSFD. Our analyses show that coverage varies strongly among taxonomic groups, and among geographic regions. In general, groups that were actively targeted in barcode projects (e.g. fish, true bugs, caddisflies and vascular plants) are well represented in the barcode libraries, while others have fewer records (e.g. marine molluscs, ascidians, and freshwater diatoms). We also found that species monitored in several countries often are represented by barcodes in reference libraries, while species monitored in a single country frequently lack sequence records. A large proportion of species (up to 50%) in several taxonomic groups are only represented by private data in BOLD. Our results have implications for the future strategy to fill existing gaps in barcode libraries, especially if DNA metabarcoding is to be used in the monitoring of European aquatic biota under the WFD and MSFD. For example, missing species relevant to monitoring in multiple countries should be prioritized for future collaborative programs. We also discuss why a strategy for quality control and quality assurance of barcode reference libraries is needed and recommend future steps to ensure full utilisation of metabarcoding in aquatic biomonitoring.Entities:
Keywords: Biological monitoring; DNA barcoding; Freshwater; Marine; Quality assurance; Reference library
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31077928 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 7.963