Literature DB >> 31077928

DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: Gap-analysis and recommendations for future work.

Hannah Weigand1, Arne J Beermann2, Fedor Čiampor3, Filipe O Costa4, Zoltán Csabai5, Sofia Duarte6, Matthias F Geiger7, Michał Grabowski8, Frédéric Rimet9, Björn Rulik10, Malin Strand11, Nikolaus Szucsich12, Alexander M Weigand13, Endre Willassen14, Sofia A Wyler15, Agnès Bouchez16, Angel Borja17, Zuzana Čiamporová-Zaťovičová18, Sónia Ferreira19, Klaas-Douwe B Dijkstra20, Ursula Eisendle21, Jörg Freyhof22, Piotr Gadawski23, Wolfram Graf24, Arne Haegerbaeumer25, Berry B van der Hoorn26, Bella Japoshvili27, Lujza Keresztes28, Emre Keskin29, Florian Leese30, Jan N Macher31, Tomasz Mamos32, Guy Paz33, Vladimir Pešić34, Daniela Maric Pfannkuchen35, Martin Andreas Pfannkuchen36, Benjamin W Price37, Buki Rinkevich38, Marcos A L Teixeira39, Gábor Várbíró40, Torbjørn Ekrem41.   

Abstract

Effective identification of species using short DNA fragments (DNA barcoding and DNA metabarcoding) requires reliable sequence reference libraries of known taxa. Both taxonomically comprehensive coverage and content quality are important for sufficient accuracy. For aquatic ecosystems in Europe, reliable barcode reference libraries are particularly important if molecular identification tools are to be implemented in biomonitoring and reports in the context of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). We analysed gaps in the two most important reference databases, Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD) and NCBI GenBank, with a focus on the taxa most frequently used in WFD and MSFD. Our analyses show that coverage varies strongly among taxonomic groups, and among geographic regions. In general, groups that were actively targeted in barcode projects (e.g. fish, true bugs, caddisflies and vascular plants) are well represented in the barcode libraries, while others have fewer records (e.g. marine molluscs, ascidians, and freshwater diatoms). We also found that species monitored in several countries often are represented by barcodes in reference libraries, while species monitored in a single country frequently lack sequence records. A large proportion of species (up to 50%) in several taxonomic groups are only represented by private data in BOLD. Our results have implications for the future strategy to fill existing gaps in barcode libraries, especially if DNA metabarcoding is to be used in the monitoring of European aquatic biota under the WFD and MSFD. For example, missing species relevant to monitoring in multiple countries should be prioritized for future collaborative programs. We also discuss why a strategy for quality control and quality assurance of barcode reference libraries is needed and recommend future steps to ensure full utilisation of metabarcoding in aquatic biomonitoring.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological monitoring; DNA barcoding; Freshwater; Marine; Quality assurance; Reference library

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31077928     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  32 in total

1.  Metabarcoding of Fish Larvae in the Merbok River Reveals Species Diversity and Distribution Along its Mangrove Environment.

Authors:  Norli Fauzani Mohd Abu Hassan Alshari; Siti Zuliana Ahmad; Azali Azlan; Youn-Ho Lee; Ghows Azzam; Siti Azizah Mohd Nor
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Establishing and using a genetic database for resolving identification of fish species in the Sea of Galilee, Israel.

Authors:  Roni Tadmor-Levi; Tomer Borovski; Evgeniya Marcos-Hadad; James Shapiro; Gideon Hulata; Daniel Golani; Lior David
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Comparing eDNA metabarcoding primers for assessing fish communities in a biodiverse estuary.

Authors:  Girish Kumar; Ashley M Reaume; Emily Farrell; Michelle R Gaither
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  A DNA barcode reference library for endemic Ponto-Caspian amphipods.

Authors:  Denis Copilaş-Ciocianu; Tomasz Rewicz; Arthur F Sands; Dmitry Palatov; Ivan Marin; Kęstutis Arbačiauskas; Paul D N Hebert; Michal Grabowski; Asta Audzijonyte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Ecosystem-specific microbiota and microbiome databases in the era of big data.

Authors:  Victor Lobanov; Angélique Gobet; Alyssa Joyce
Journal:  Environ Microbiome       Date:  2022-07-16

6.  Mapping biodiversity hotspots of fish communities in subtropical streams through environmental DNA.

Authors:  Rosetta C Blackman; Maslin Osathanunkul; Jeanine Brantschen; Cristina Di Muri; Lynsey R Harper; Elvira Mächler; Bernd Hänfling; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Coverage and quality of DNA barcode references for Central and Northern European Odonata.

Authors:  Matthias Geiger; Stephan Koblmüller; Giacomo Assandri; Andreas Chovanec; Torbjørn Ekrem; Iris Fischer; Andrea Galimberti; Michał Grabowski; Elisabeth Haring; Axel Hausmann; Lars Hendrich; Stefan Koch; Tomasz Mamos; Udo Rothe; Björn Rulik; Tomasz Rewicz; Marcia Sittenthaler; Elisabeth Stur; Grzegorz Tończyk; Lukas Zangl; Jerome Moriniere
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  MARES, a replicable pipeline and curated reference database for marine eukaryote metabarcoding.

Authors:  Vanessa Arranz; William S Pearman; J David Aguirre; Libby Liggins
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 6.444

9.  Environmental DNA from plastic and textile marine litter detects exotic and nuisance species nearby ports.

Authors:  Aitor Ibabe; Fernando Rayón; Jose Luis Martinez; Eva Garcia-Vazquez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Plant DNA Barcode as a Tool for Root Identification in Hypogea: The Case of the Etruscan Tombs of Tarquinia (Central Italy).

Authors:  Daniela Isola; Flavia Bartoli; Simone Langone; Simona Ceschin; Laura Zucconi; Giulia Caneva
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.