Literature DB >> 31077777

Cross-sectional study of the prevalence, causes and management of hospital-onset diarrhoea.

D Mawer1, F Byrne2, S Drake2, C Brown2, A Prescott2, B Warne3, R Bousfield3, J P Skittrall4, I Ramsay3, D Somasunderam3, M Bevan5, J Coslett5, J Rao6, P Stanley7, A Kennedy7, R Dobson7, S Long8, T Obisanya8, T Esmailji8, C Petridou9, K Saeed9, K Brechany9, K Davis-Blue9, H O'Horan9, B Wake9, J Martin10, J Featherstone10, C Hall11, J Allen11, G Johnson11, C Hornigold11, N Amir12, K Henderson13, C McClements13, I Liew13, A Deshpande14, E Vink15, D Trigg16, J Guilfoyle16, M Scarborough17, C Scarborough18, T H N Wong17, T Walker17, N Fawcett19, G Morris20, K Tomlin21, C Grix21, E O'Cofaigh22, D McCaffrey23, M Cooper24, K Corbett25, K French24, S Harper25, C Hayward25, M Reid25, V Whatley26, J Winfield25, S Hoque27, L Kelly28, I King29, A Bradley29, B McCullagh30, C Hibberd30, M Merron29, C McCabe29, S Horridge31, J Taylor32, S Koo33, F Elsanousi33, R Saunders33, F Lim33, A Bond34, S Stone35, I D Milligan36, D J F Mack36, A Nagar37, R M West38, M H Wilcox39, A Kirby40, J A T Sandoe40.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Health Service in England advises hospitals collect data on hospital-onset diarrhoea (HOD). Contemporaneous data on HOD are lacking. AIM: To investigate prevalence, aetiology and management of HOD on medical, surgical and elderly-care wards.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study in a volunteer sample of UK hospitals, which collected data on one winter and one summer day in 2016. Patients admitted ≥72 h were screened for HOD (definition: ≥2 episodes of Bristol Stool Type 5-7 the day before the study, with diarrhoea onset >48 h after admission). Data on HOD aetiology and management were collected prospectively.
FINDINGS: Data were collected on 141 wards in 32 hospitals (16 acute, 16 teaching). Point-prevalence of HOD was 4.5% (230/5142 patients; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9-5.0%). Teaching hospital HOD prevalence (5.9%, 95% CI 5.1-6.9%) was twice that of acute hospitals (2.8%, 95% CI 2.1-3.5%; odds ratio 2.2, 95% CI 1.7-3.0). At least one potential cause was identified in 222/230 patients (97%): 107 (47%) had a relevant underlying condition, 125 (54%) were taking antimicrobials, and 195 (85%) other medication known to cause diarrhoea. Nine of 75 tested patients were Clostridium difficile toxin positive (4%). Eighty (35%) patients had a documented medical assessment of diarrhoea. Documentation of HOD in medical notes correlated with testing for C. difficile (78% of those tested vs 38% not tested, P<0.001). One-hundred and forty-four (63%) patients were not isolated following diarrhoea onset.
CONCLUSION: HOD is a prevalent symptom affecting thousands of patients across the UK health system each day. Most patients had multiple potential causes of HOD, mainly iatrogenic, but only a third had medical assessment. Most were not tested for C. difficile and were not isolated.
Copyright © 2019 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficile; Diarrhoea; Hospital acquired; Hospital onset; Nosocomial

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31077777     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  2 in total

1.  Reply to Tenover et al., "Guidelines Support the Value of Stand-Alone Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection".

Authors:  Johanna Sandlund; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Testing for Higher Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Johanna Sandlund; Kerrie Davies; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.948

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.