Literature DB >> 3107726

Continuous opportunistic and systematic screening for hypertension with computer help: analysis of non-responders.

F Difford, J P Telling, K R Davies, J E Fornear, C A Reading.   

Abstract

For two years an office computer was used to identify patients to prompt for opportunistic screening and call for systematic screening. After the two years 92% of patients on the list had had blood pressure readings recorded within the previous five years, of which 34% resulted from special prompts and 22% from screening letters. Those who failed to respond to letters were sent questionnaires, and their records were compared with those of screened patients. With the help of a microcomputer it is practicable to sustain a continuous screening rate of between 90% and 95%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3107726      PMCID: PMC1246290          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.294.6580.1130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  3 in total

1.  Semicontinuous screening of a whole community for hypertension.

Authors:  J T Hart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1970-08-01       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Maintaining the accuracy of a computer practice register: household index.

Authors:  F Difford; P M Hook; M Sledge
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-02-16

3.  Hypertension in general practice: what is to be done?

Authors:  J Coope
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-03-24
  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  Future trends in general practice computing.

Authors:  F Difford
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-10

2.  Computer held chronic disease registers in general practice: a validation study.

Authors:  A Coulter; S Brown; A Daniels
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Implementation of a microcomputer-based opportunistic health maintenance programme in a general practice teaching clinic.

Authors:  D H Chan; N F Chan; C Chan; G Lui; S P Donnan
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1988-08

4.  Randomised controlled trial evaluating cardiovascular screening and intervention in general practice: principal results of British family heart study. Family Heart Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-29

5.  Effect of non-attenders on the potential of a primary care programme to reduce cardiovascular risk in the population. Family Heart Study Group.

Authors:  G Davies; S Pyke; A L Kinmonth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-12-10

6.  Ebeltoft project: baseline data from a five-year randomized, controlled, prospective health promotion study in a Danish population.

Authors:  T Lauritzen; C Leboeuf-Yde; I M Lunde; K D Nielsen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  What do we know about who does and does not attend general health checks? Findings from a narrative scoping review.

Authors:  Ruth Dryden; Brian Williams; Colin McCowan; Markus Themessl-Huber
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Cigarette smoking, health status, socio-economic status and access to health care in diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  M C Gulliford; J E C Sedgwick; A J Pearce
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.