Literature DB >> 3107722

Mortality from myocardial infarction in different types of hospitals.

R Reznik, I Ring, P Fletcher, G Berry.   

Abstract

Hospitals ranging from large urban teaching hospitals to small country hospitals were stratified into four levels of care and examined for their effectiveness of coronary care in relation to these levels. The crude hospital mortality among 2265 patients admitted for definite or possible acute myocardial infarction was 21% at level 1 (the most elaborate level), 22% at level 2, 21% at level 3, and 19% at level 4 (the least elaborate). Adjustment for age or other prognostic factors produced no significant differences across levels either for coronary care unit care or for combined coronary unit and ward care. Success in resuscitation was also similar across levels. These findings suggest that increased resources for coronary care units--whether for new services or for upgrading existing ones--may not be required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3107722      PMCID: PMC1246285          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.294.6580.1121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  15 in total

1.  A CORONARY PROGNOSTIC INDEX FOR GRADING THE SEVERITY OF INFARCTION.

Authors:  A A Peel; T Semple; I Wang; W M Lancaster; J L Dall
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1962-11

2.  Impact of the new generation coronary care unit.

Authors:  M F O'Rourke; B Walsh; M Fletcher; A Crowley
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-10-09

3.  Comparison of mortality of patients with heart attacks admitted to a coronary care unit and an ordinary medical ward.

Authors:  J D Hill; G Holdstock; J R Hampton
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-07-09

4.  A new coronary prognostic index.

Authors:  R M Norris; P W Brandt; D E Caughey; A J Lee; P J Scott
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1969-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Benefits obtained by the introduction of a coronary-care unit. A comparative study.

Authors:  I Christiansen; K Iversen; A P Skouby
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1971-04

6.  The coronary care controversy.

Authors:  J M Rawles; A C Kenmure
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-09-20

7.  An improved approximate formula for calculating sample sizes for comparing two binomial distributions.

Authors:  J T Casagrande; M C Pike
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Site of care and survival after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  C Bain; V Siskind; G Neilson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1981-08-22       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Coronary care units. A perspective on their epidemiologic impact.

Authors:  L Goldman
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Myocardial infarction: a comparison between home and hospital care for patients.

Authors:  H G Mather; D C Morgan; N G Pearson; K L Read; D B Shaw; G R Steed; M G Thorne; C J Lawrence; I S Riley
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-04-17
View more
  2 in total

1.  The management of suspected myocardial infarction by Scottish general practitioners with access to community hospital beds.

Authors:  R Liddell; J Grant; J Rawles
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Differences in mortality from acute myocardial infarction between coronary care unit and medical ward: treatment or bias?

Authors:  R Reznik; I Ring; P Fletcher; V Siskind
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-12-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.