Literature DB >> 31077212

Effect of lipid metabolism disorder on liver function in patients with malignant tumors after chemotherapy: a case-control study.

Yan Sun1, Nie Zhang2, Yun-Long Ding3, Li-Jiang Yu1, Jun Cai1, Wu Yang1, Wang-Kun Lu1, Jia-Li Niu4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the effect of lipid metabolism disorder on liver function in patients with malignant tumors after chemotherapy.
METHOD: A total of 428 patients with malignant tumors with normal liver function in our hospital between May 2013 to June 2018 were divided into an observation group (lipid metabolism disorder, n = 265) and control group (normal lipid metabolism, n = 163). The lipid metabolism levels and liver damage of the two groups were compared before and after chemotherapy.
RESULTS: No significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, tumor types, history of surgery, levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT; an indicator of liver function), and chemotherapy regimen were observed between the two groups. However, the observation group showed increased levels of total cholesterol (P = 0.000), triglycerides (P = 0.000), and low-density lipoprotein (P = 0.01), as well as decreased levels of high-density lipoprotein (P = 0.000) before chemotherapy compared with the control group. Furthermore, patients with lipid metabolism disorders were more likely to develop abnormal liver function after chemotherapy. Moreover, mixed lipid metabolism disorder was more likely to cause severe liver damage after chemotherapy. Additionally, the number of patients with lipid metabolism disorders after chemotherapy (n = 367) was significantly increased compared with before chemotherapy (n = 265) (P < 0.01), indicating that chemotherapy might induce or aggravate an abnormal lipid metabolism.
CONCLUSIONS: After receiving chemotherapy, patients with malignant tumors presenting lipid metabolism disorders are more prone to liver damage and lipid metabolism disorders than patients with a normal lipid metabolism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Lipid metabolism; Liver function; Tumor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31077212      PMCID: PMC6511181          DOI: 10.1186/s12944-019-1063-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lipids Health Dis        ISSN: 1476-511X            Impact factor:   3.876


Background

Malignant tumors are a serious threat to human health, and chemotherapy remains one of the main treatments. However, chemotherapy has many toxic side effects [1]. For instance, as most chemotherapeutic drugs are metabolized by the liver, liver toxicity is one of the most common side effects [2]. Clinical manifestations of chemotherapy-induced liver damage are diverse, ranging from slight liver function abnormalities to severe cases of toxic hepatitis or fulminant hepatic failure. Hepatic toxicity is generally reversible [3], but may still cause fibrosis or cirrhosis if discontinued. In addition, liver damage caused by chemotherapeutic drugs may lead to lipid metabolism disorders and even hyperlipidemia [4, 5]. High-fat, high-energy diets have resulted in an increase in the incidence of lipid metabolism disorders [6]. Under this condition, reduced transport of fat causes lipids to accumulate in liver cells, resulting in a fatty liver [7]. Fat accumulation in the liver can affect the function of or destroy liver cells and cause connective tissue hyperplasia and cirrhosis, which affects drug metabolism [8]. Because chemotherapeutic drugs can cause liver damage and liver damage is associated with lipid metabolism disorders, we suspect that lipid metabolism disorders may be related to liver damage caused by chemotherapeutic drugs, but no research on this topic has been reported. In the present study, we examined lipid metabolism in patients with malignant tumors who were treated at our hospital in recent years and assessed impairments in liver function after chemotherapy to investigate the effect of lipid metabolism disorders on liver function in patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Materials and methods

General information

This study included patients who were undergoing chemotherapy at our hospital from May 2013 to June 2018. Exclusion criteria were patients with diseases associated with liver damage, such as liver metastasis, viral hepatitis, drug-induced liver disease, total parenteral nutrition, and hepatolenticular degeneration. Inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with malignant tumors via a pathological or cytological examination who required chemotherapy, had no chemotherapy contraindications, were aged≥18 years, had normal liver function (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level ≤ 50 IU/L), and had a Kamofsky performance status ≥70 points. Before chemotherapy, tests of blood lipids and liver function were performed on all patients.

Procedure

The blood lipid levels and liver function of each patient were assessed before chemotherapy. All indicators were in the normal range before chemotherapy. All patients underwent chemotherapy with a combination regimen according to the pathological type of malignancy. Common chemotherapy drugs included oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, cisplatin, platinum, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, capecitabine, vincristine, and irinotecan, among others. Blood lipid levels and liver function were also measured approximately 1 week after chemotherapy was initiated. If abnormal liver function was observed during chemotherapy, chemotherapy was suspended and relevant drugs were administered as a protective treatment. Liver function was reassessed every 5–7 days until it returned to normal levels, after which chemotherapy was continued. After chemotherapy, liver function and blood lipid levels were analyzed again. In this study, liver function and blood lipid levels were all measured approximately 1 week after chemotherapy was initiated. Venous blood was collected in the morning from all patients who had fasted for more than 8 h, and total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels were determined. Lipid indicators, liver function and ALT levels were assessed using enzymatic methods.

Types of lipid metabolism disorders

Based on the recommendations for the prevention and treatment of dyslipidemia, lipid metabolism disorders are classified as follows [9]: 1. hypercholesterolemia (fasting serum TC level exceeding 5.72 mmol/L); 2. hypertriglyceridemia (fasting serum TG level exceeding 1.70 mmol/L); 3. mixed hyperlipidemia (increased fasting serum TC and TG levels); and 4. low high-density lipoproteinemia (fasting serum HDL level < 0.9 mmol/L).

Criteria for evaluating liver function

According to the World Health Organization standards for the toxicity and side effects of anticancer drugs, the evaluation of liver function was defined using the following criteria: 1. normal liver function, serum ALT level ≤ 1.25 N (N = 40 IU/L); 2. liver function damage I level, 1.25 N < serum ALT level < 2.5 N; 3. liver function damage II level, 2.5 N < serum ALT level < 5 N; 4. liver function damage III level, 5 N < serum ALT level < 10 N; and 5. liver function damage IV level, serum ALT level > 10 N.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)

According to the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of NAFLD [10], the disease is divided into non-alcoholic simple fatty liver disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver hepatitis and non-alcoholic fatty liver cirrhosis.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 statistical analysis software. The count data are presented as means±standard deviations. T-tests were used for comparisons between groups. Dichotomous variables were analyzed using the χ2 test. If the number of observations was less than 5, Fisher’s exact probability test was used to calculate the P value. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The observation group showed increased levels of TC, TG, and LDL and decreased levels of HDL before chemotherapy

A total of 428 patients with malignant tumors with normal liver function (199 males and 229 females, with an average age of 62.4 ± 9.2 years) were enrolled in our hospital from May 2013 to June 2018. These patients were divided into the lipid metabolism disorder group (observation group, n = 265) and normal lipid metabolism group (control group, n = 163) according to the lipid metabolism status before chemotherapy. In the observation group, 69 patients (26.0%) had high cholesterol levels, 98 patients (37.0%) had high TG levels, 61 patients (23.0%) had a mixed type, and 37 patients (14.0%) had a low HDL-C type. General characteristics of the two groups are shown in Table 1. No significant differences in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor types, and history of surgery between the two groups.
Table 1

Comparison of the general conditions between the two groups

ItemObservation (n = 265)Control (n = 163) P
Age62.0 ± 9.361.3 ± 9.00.247
Male123 (46.4)76 (46.6)0.996
BMI22.2 ± 2.021.8 ± 2.60.086
Tumor types
Gastrointestinal cancer105 (39.6)61 (37.4)0.650
Lung cancer47 (17.7)37 (22.7)0.209
Breast cancer56 (21.1)32 (19.6)0.709
Gynecologic cancer25 (9.4)16 (9.8)0.896
Malignant lymphoma10 (3.8)6 (3.7)0.961
Other tumors22 (8.3)11 (6.7)0.559
Surgery182 (68.7)116 (71.2)0.587
ALT before chemotherapy26.2 ± 7.825.4 ± 9.40.361
TC before chemotherapy5.5 ± 1.24.7 ± 0.70.000
TG before chemotherapy1.8 ± 0.61.3 ± 0.20.000
HDL before chemotherapy1.3 ± 0.51.4 ± 0.40.000
LDL before chemotherapy3.2 ± 1.12.9 ± 0.80.010

BMI body mass index, ALT alanine aminotransferase, TC total cholesterol, TG triglycerides, HDL high-density lipid, LDL low-density lipoprotein; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

Comparison of the general conditions between the two groups BMI body mass index, ALT alanine aminotransferase, TC total cholesterol, TG triglycerides, HDL high-density lipid, LDL low-density lipoprotein; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant Furthermore, significant differences in ALT levels (a sensitive indicator of liver function) before chemotherapy were not observed between the observation (26.2 ± 7.8 IU/L) and control groups (25.4 ± 9.4 IU/L). However, the observation group showed increased levels of TC (P = 0.000), TG (P = 0.000), and LDL (P = 0.01) and decreased levels of HDL (P = 0.000) before chemotherapy compared with the control group. Moreover, significant differences in the chemotherapy regimen were not observed between the two groups (Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison of the chemotherapy regimens between the two groups [case(%)]

ItemObservation (n = 265)Control (n = 163) P
CHOP10 (3.8)6 (3.7)0.961
CP4 (1.5)0(0)0.302
DP2 (0.8)3 (1.8)0.374
DVP0 (0)1 (0.6)0.381
FOLFIRI14 (5.3)7 (4.3)0.646
FOLFOX76 (28.7)39 (23.9)0.281
GP26 (9.8)19 (11.7)0.546
IP2 (0.8)0 (0)0.527
NF11 (4.2)6 (3.7)0.809
NP39 (14.7)30 (18.4)0.314
PVB0 (0)2 (1.2)0.144
PVD2 (0.8)2 (1.2)0.637
TA25 (9.4)13 (8)0.606
TF6 (2.3)9 (5.5)0.075
TOX2 (0.8)0 (0)0.527
TP44 (16.6)24 (14.7)0.605
VA0 (0)2 (1.2)0.144
VP2 (0.8)0 (0)0.527
Comparison of the chemotherapy regimens between the two groups [case(%)]

The observation group showed a higher incidence of liver damage after chemotherapy

The levels of liver damage after chemotherapy in the two groups are shown in Table 3. The incidence of liver damage after chemotherapy was 47.2% in the observation group (125/ 265), with 111 patients presenting level I damage (41.9%), 8 patients presenting level II damage (3.0%), and 6 patients presenting level III damage (2.3%), whereas the incidence in the control group was 20.9% (34/163), with 29 presenting level I damage (17.8%), 3 patients presenting level II damage (1.8%), and 2 patients presenting level III damage (1.2%). The incidence of liver damage after chemotherapy in the observation group was significantly greater than in the control group (P < 0.01). Based on these results, patients with lipid metabolism disorder are more prone to liver damage after chemotherapy than patients with normal lipid metabolism.
Table 3

Comparison of liver function damage after chemotherapy between the two groups [case(%)]

GroupLevel ILevel IILevel IIILevel IVTotal
Observation (n = 265)111 (41.9)8 (3.0)6 (2.3)0 (0)125 (47.2)**
Control (n = 163)29 (17.8)3 (1.8)2 (1.2)0 (0)34 (20.9)

Compared with the control group,*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

Comparison of liver function damage after chemotherapy between the two groups [case(%)] Compared with the control group,*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

Types of lipid metabolism disorders before chemotherapy correlated with liver function after chemotherapy

The correlations between the types of lipid metabolism disorders before chemotherapy and liver function after chemotherapy are presented in Table 4. No significant differences in the percentages of patients with normal liver function and liver damage at levels I and level II were observed among the hypercholesterolemia group, hypertriglyceridemia group, the mixed hyperlipidemia group, and low-HDL group. However, liver function at damage level III after chemotherapy was observed in 6 patients in the mixed hyperlipidemia group, but was not observed in the other groups. Moreover, a significant difference in the percentage of patients presenting function damage level III after chemotherapy was observed among the four groups (P = 0.000). In addition, a statistically significant difference in the degree of liver damage after chemotherapy was observed among the four groups (P = 0.002). Thus, a significant correlation exists between the type of lipid metabolism disorder before chemotherapy and liver function after chemotherapy.
Table 4

Types of lipid metabolism disorders and liver function after chemotherapy [case (%)]

TypeHypercholesterolemiaHypertriglyceridemiaMixedLow-HDL P
Normal39 (56.5)48 (49.0)30 (49.2)23 (62.2)0.461
Level I30 (43.5)48 (49.0)21 (34.4)12 (32.4)0.183
Level II0 (0)2 (2.0)4 (6.6)2 (5.4)0.067
Level III0 (0)0 (0)6 (9.8)0 (0)0.000
Total699861370.002
Types of lipid metabolism disorders and liver function after chemotherapy [case (%)]

Changes in lipid metabolism before and after chemotherapy

In addition to investigating the effect of lipid metabolism disorders on damage to liver function in patients with cancer after chemotherapy, we also evaluated the effect of chemotherapy on lipid metabolism in patients. Two hundred sixty-five patients presented with dyslipidemia and 163 patients presented with normal lipid metabolism before chemotherapy. Interestingly, the number of patients with dyslipidemia (n = 367) after chemotherapy was significantly increased compared with before chemotherapy (P < 0.01) (Table 5). Based on these data, chemotherapy might induce or aggravate lipid metabolism disorders.
Table 5

Changes in lipid metabolism before and after chemotherapy

Lipid metabolism before chemotherapyLipid metabolism after chemotherapy
DisorderNormalTotal
Disorders23926265
Normal12835163
Total36761428
Changes in lipid metabolism before and after chemotherapy

Discussion

Clinically, many patients receiving chemotherapy develop lipid metabolism disorders. In addition, the administration of chemotherapy to patients with lipid metabolism disorders may increase the risk of liver damage. However, currently, evidence for the relationship between lipid metabolism disorders and liver damage after chemotherapy is limited. The results from the present study showed increased levels of TC, TG, and LDL and decreased levels of HDL in the patients with lipid metabolism disorder before chemotherapy compared with the patients with normal lipid metabolism (Table 1). Furthermore, patients with lipid metabolism disorders are more likely to develop abnormal liver function after chemotherapy (Table 3). Moreover, mixed lipid metabolism disorder is more likely to cause severe liver damage after chemotherapy (Table 4). In addition, the number of patients with lipid metabolism disorders after chemotherapy (n = 367) was significantly increased compared with before chemotherapy (n = 265) (Table 5), indicating that chemotherapy potentially induces or aggravates abnormal lipid metabolism. According to the evidence, chemotherapy drugs can cause lipid metabolism disorders. Paclitaxel and platinum-based chemotherapy caused transient dyslipidemia in three patients with cancer [11]. The chemotherapy drug 5-fluorouracil induces steatosis by generating reactive oxygen species [12]. Lipid metabolism disorders may be induced by chemotherapy due to drug toxicity [13]. Consistent with this finding, chemotherapy induced or aggravated abnormal lipid metabolism in the present study, as indicated by the increased number of patients with lipid metabolism disorders after chemotherapy. Chemotherapeutic drugs have been shown to induce liver damage [12, 14, 15]. Almost all chemotherapeutic drugs are metabolized by the liver, the metabolic center of the body, and thus easily lead to drug-induced liver damage. Chemotherapeutic drugs mainly cause liver damage mainly through the following three pathways: (1) drugs and their metabolites directly damage liver cells; (2) chemotherapy may aggravate liver damage in patients with pre-existing liver diseases; and (3) pre-existing liver diseases might reduce the activity of drug-metabolizing enzymes and prolong the duration of drug action, thereby increasing the toxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs. As shown in recent studies, lipid metabolism is closely related to the occurrence and development of tumors. Patients with tumors tend to have lipid metabolism disorders. In the present study, compared with patients with normal lipid metabolism, patients with malignant tumors presenting dyslipidemia showed an increased incidence of hepatic impairment after chemotherapy. Thus, hepatotoxicity should be more carefully assessed when chemotherapeutic drugs are administered to patients with lipid metabolism disorders. The mechanisms by which lipid metabolism disorders affect liver function after chemotherapy are not yet completely understood, but may be related to the factors described below. (1) Excess lipids directly exert adverse effects on liver function. When a lipid metabolism disorder occurs, the liver is unable to transport fat in a timely manner, thus causing fat to accumulate in liver cells and resulting in fatty liver. Fat accumulation in the liver affects liver function and destroys liver cells, subsequently reducing the liver compensatory capacity and causing connective tissue hyperplasia, cirrhosis, and liver damage [16]. (2) Pre-existing dyslipidemia indirectly contributes to liver damage after chemotherapy. Most chemotherapeutic drugs are cytotoxic and immunosuppressive agents, causing a certain degree of damage to the liver themselves [17]. Chronic liver damage is present in patients with lipid metabolism disorders, resulting in a decreased drug metabolism capacity and aggravation of liver damage. (3) Pro-inflammatory cytokines exacerbate liver damage. For example, tumor cell necrosis after chemotherapy causes the release of tumor necrosis factor, one of the main factors involved in liver cell damage and even hepatic necrosis [18]. (4) The oxidative stress response also contributes to liver damage. Excess intake of free fatty acids causes oxidative overload in the mitochondria of hepatocytes, producing more reactive oxygen species (ROS). The expression of uncoupling protein 2 is compensatorily increased to reduce ROS production, and a large amount of adenosine triphosphate is consumed, leading to the apoptosis or even necrosis of hepatocytes [19]. Hepatocyte necrosis produces a large amount of inflammatory factors, further increasing the production of free radicals. Chemotherapy-induced liver damage in patients with cancer may occur during chemotherapy or after the total course. Although liver function impairment may be reversed in some patients after treatment, abnormal liver function may lead to an interruption of anti-tumor therapy and jeopardize the prognosis of patients [20]. The clinical consequences of liver damage after chemotherapy in patients with cancer vary. Mild cases may only produce an asymptomatic increase in ALT levels, spontaneous reversal may occur in some patients, and severe cases may involve jaundice, ascites, coagulation abnormalities, encephalopathy and other signs of liver failure, with a high mortality rate if not treated effectively [21]. The symptoms experienced by these patients are mild, with most having no symptoms or signs, and abnormalities are only observed when liver function is measured. For patients with symptoms and signs, except for jaundice, the main symptoms are fatigue, anorexia, bloating, abdominal pain, and fever. The clinical manifestations of patients are similar to the original disease; they are not specific and are difficult to identify. Thus, the clinical manifestations of liver damage after chemotherapy are subtle in some patients and may not be detected in a timely manner, with a risk of worsening adverse reactions during continued treatment. Therefore, transaminase levels should be regularly monitored in patients with cancer who are undergoing chemotherapy. Once abnormal liver function is detected, a hepatoprotective enzyme treatment should be administered in a timely manner to prevent the further aggravation of the disease and ensure the successful completion of chemotherapy. Lipid metabolism disorders are major risk factors for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases and exert important effects on the metastasis and prognosis of some tumors, particularly breast and gastrointestinal tumors. Therefore, blood lipid levels must be controlled in patients with tumors. Patients with cancer should pay special attention to their eating habits and avoid high-fat diets to prevent abnormal lipid metabolism. Routine screening of blood lipid and transaminase levels before chemotherapy is recommended for patients with cancer, as are preventive measures to regulate lipid metabolism and protect liver function to reduce the incidence of hepatic damage, liver failure and tumor-related mortality. Improvements in the quality of life of patients with cancer will have a positive impact on the prognosis.

Conclusions

In conclusion, patients with malignant tumors presenting lipid metabolism disorders are more prone to liver damage after chemotherapy than patients with a normal lipid metabolism. Furthermore, mixed lipid metabolism disorders are more likely to cause severe liver damage.
  20 in total

1.  Risk factors and metabolic abnormality of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Either non-obese or obese Chinese population.

Authors:  Shou-Wu Lee; Teng-Yu Lee; Sheng-Shun Yang; Chun-Fang Tung; Hong-Zen Yeh; Chi-Sen Chang
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2018-01-31

Review 2.  Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors:  Patrick H Sweet; Teresa Khoo; Steven Nguyen
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.907

Review 3.  Hepatotoxicity following systemic therapy for colorectal liver metastases and the impact of chemotherapy-associated liver injury on outcomes after curative liver resection.

Authors:  G Duwe; S Knitter; S Pesthy; A S Beierle; M Bahra; M Schmelzle; R B Schmuck; P Lohneis; N Raschzok; R Öllinger; M Sinn; B Struecker; I M Sauer; J Pratschke; A Andreou
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 4.  The developing clinical problem of chemotherapy-induced hepatic injury.

Authors:  Charles H C Pilgrim; Benjamin N Thomson; Simon Banting; Wayne A Phillips; Michael Michael
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 5.  Hypertriglyceridemia and hyperglycemia induced by capecitabine: a report of two cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Gao-Hua Han; Jun-Xing Huang
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 1.809

6.  Paclitaxel and platinum-based chemotherapy results in transient dyslipidemia in cancer patients.

Authors:  Guoping Wang; Chao Su; Tao Yin
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-13

7.  Mitochondrial adaptations to steatohepatitis induced by a methionine- and choline-deficient diet.

Authors:  Caroline Romestaing; Marie-Astrid Piquet; Dominique Letexier; Benjamin Rey; Arnaud Mourier; Stéphane Servais; Maud Belouze; Vincent Rouleau; Marianne Dautresme; Isabelle Ollivier; Roland Favier; Michel Rigoulet; Claude Duchamp; Brigitte Sibille
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 4.310

8.  The frequency and severity of capecitabine-induced hypertriglyceridaemia in routine clinical practice: a prospective study.

Authors:  C O Michie; M Sakala; I Rivans; M W J Strachan; S Clive
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Effects of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy on liver function--an analysis of impact and functional recovery using the LiMAx test.

Authors:  Maximilian Jara; Jan Bednarsch; Maciej Malinowski; Johann Pratschke; Martin Stockmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  RIPK1 protects from TNF-α-mediated liver damage during hepatitis.

Authors:  Aveline Filliol; Claire Piquet-Pellorce; Jacques Le Seyec; Muhammad Farooq; Valentine Genet; Catherine Lucas-Clerc; John Bertin; Peter J Gough; Marie-Thérèse Dimanche-Boitrel; Peter Vandenabeele; Mathieu Jm Bertrand; Michel Samson
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 8.469

View more
  1 in total

1.  Image Processing and Machine Learning-Based Classification and Detection of Liver Tumor.

Authors:  V Durga Prasad Jasti; Enagandula Prasad; Manish Sawale; Shivlal Mewada; Manoj L Bangare; Pushpa M Bangare; Sunil L Bangare; F Sammy
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.246

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.