Literature DB >> 31076231

Characterizing Fatty Liver in vivo in Rabbits, Using Quantitative Ultrasound.

Trong N Nguyen1, Anthony S Podkowa1, Alex Y Tam1, Eben C Arnold1, Rita J Miller1, Trevor H Park1, Minh N Do1, Michael L Oelze2.   

Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease and can often lead to fibrosis, cirrhosis, cancer and complete liver failure. Liver biopsy is the current standard of care to quantify hepatic steatosis, but it comes with increased patient risk and only samples a small portion of the liver. Imaging approaches to assess NAFLD include proton density fat fraction estimated via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and shear wave elastography. However, MRI is expensive and shear wave elastography is not proven to be sensitive to fat content of the liver (Kramer et al. 2016). On the other hand, ultrasonic attenuation and the backscatter coefficient (BSC) have been observed to be sensitive to levels of fat in the liver (Lin et al. 2015; Paige et al. 2017). In this study, we assessed the use of attenuation and the BSC to quantify hepatic steatosis in vivo in a rabbit model of fatty liver. Rabbits were maintained on a high-fat diet for 0, 1, 2, 3 or 6 wk, with 3 rabbits per diet group (total N = 15). An array transducer (L9-4) with a center frequency of 4.5 MHz connected to a SonixOne scanner was used to gather radio frequency (RF) backscattered data in vivo from rabbits. The RF signals were used to estimate an average attenuation and BSC for each rabbit. Two approaches were used to parameterize the BSC (i.e., the effective scatterer diameter and effective acoustic concentration using a spherical Gaussian model and a model-free approach using a principal component analysis [PCA]). The 2 major components of the PCA from the BSCs, which captured 96% of the variance of the transformed data, were used to generate input features to a support vector machine for classification. Rabbits were separated into two liver fat-level classes, such that approximately half of the rabbits were in the low-lipid class (≤9% lipid liver level) and half of the rabbits in the high-lipid class (>9% lipid liver level). The slope and the midband fit of the attenuation coefficient provided statistically significant differences (p value = 0.00014 and p value = 0.007, using a two-sample t test) between low and high-lipid fat classes. The proposed model-free and model-based parameterization of the BSC and attenuation coefficient parameters yielded classification accuracies of 84.11 %, 82.93 % and 78.91 % for differentiating low-lipid versus high-lipid classes, respectively. The results suggest that attenuation and BSC analysis can differentiate low-fat versus high-fat livers in a rabbit model of fatty liver disease.
Copyright © 2019 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fatty liver; PCA; QUS; SVM

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31076231      PMCID: PMC6591075          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  70 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive tests for liver disease, fibrosis, and cirrhosis: Is liver biopsy obsolete?

Authors:  Emily Carey; William D Carey
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.321

2.  Ultrasound backscatter and attenuation in human liver with diffuse disease.

Authors:  Z F Lu; J A Zagzebski; F T Lee
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from steatosis to cirrhosis.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Farrell; Claire Z Larter
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Ultrasound attenuation and backscatter in the liver during prednisone administration.

Authors:  Z F Lu; J A Zagzebski; R T O'Brien; H Steinberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 5.  The role of matrix stiffness in hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Rebecca G Wells
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 6.  Pathology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Matthew M Yeh; Elizabeth M Brunt
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Comparison of ELF, FibroTest and FibroScan for the non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Mireen Friedrich-Rust; William Rosenberg; Julie Parkes; Eva Herrmann; Stefan Zeuzem; Christoph Sarrazin
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 8.  Imaging-based quantification of hepatic fat: methods and clinical applications.

Authors:  Xiaozhou Ma; Nagaraj-Setty Holalkere; Avinash Kambadakone R; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Peter F Hahn; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Fatty liver disease in severe obese patients: diagnostic value of abdominal ultrasound.

Authors:  Alessandro de Moura Almeida; Helma Pinchemel Cotrim; Daniel Batista Valente Barbosa; Luciana Gordilho Matteoni de Athayde; Adimeia Souza Santos; Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt; Luiz Antonio Rodrigues de Freitas; Adriano Rios; Erivaldo Alves
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Phosphorylated IGFBP-1 as a non-invasive predictor of liver fat in NAFLD.

Authors:  Elina M Petäjä; You Zhou; Marika Havana; Antti Hakkarainen; Nina Lundbom; Jarkko Ihalainen; Hannele Yki-Järvinen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation in nonlinear regime using an in situ calibration target.

Authors:  Andres Coila; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Identifying and overcoming limitations with in situ calibration beads for quantitative ultrasound.

Authors:  Jenna Cario; Andres Coila; Yuning Zhao; Rita J Miller; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Use of a convolutional neural network and quantitative ultrasound for diagnosis of fatty liver.

Authors:  Trong N Nguyen; Anthony S Podkowa; Trevor H Park; Rita J Miller; Minh N Do; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Analytic Global Regularized Backscatter Quantitative Ultrasound.

Authors:  Noushin Jafarpisheh; Timothy J Hall; Hassan Rivaz; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Multiparametric ultrasound imaging for the assessment of normal versus steatotic livers.

Authors:  Lokesh Basavarajappa; Jihye Baek; Shreya Reddy; Jane Song; Haowei Tai; Girdhari Rijal; Kevin J Parker; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Quantitative ultrasound approaches for diagnosis and monitoring hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Amir M Pirmoazen; Aman Khurana; Ahmed El Kaffas; Aya Kamaya
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 11.556

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.