Literature DB >> 31076179

Comparison of early and midterm outcomes after transsubclavian/axillary versus transfemoral, transapical, or transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Hisato Takagi1, Yosuke Hari2, Kouki Nakashima2, Toshiki Kuno3, Tomo Ando4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after transsubclavian/transaxillary (TSc/TAx)-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have been unclear.
OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes after TSc/TAx-TAVI versus transfemoral (TF)-TAVI, transapical (TAp)-TAVI, or transaortic (TAo)-TAVI, we performed meta-analysis of currently available studies.
METHODS: Studies considered for inclusion met the following criteria: the study population was patients undergoing TAVI; patients were assigned to TSc/TAx-TAVI and TF-TAVI, TAp-TAVI, or TAo-TAVI; and at least one of postprocedural early (30-day or in-hospital) or late (including early) outcomes was reported. An odds or hazard ratio of each early or late outcome with its 95% confidence interval for TSc/TAx-TAVI versus the other approach was extracted from each individual study and combined in the random-effects model.
RESULTS: Our search identified 15 eligible reports from 12 studies including 10,528 patients. Pooled analysis of early all-cause mortality demonstrated a statistically significant reduction after TSc/TAx-TAVI compared with TAp-TAVI (P = 0.003) or TAo-TAVI (P = 0.03). Pooled analysis of early pacemaker implantation demonstrated a statistically significant increase after TSc/TAx-TAVI compared with TAp-TAVI (P = 0.0001) or TAo-TAVI (P < 0.00001). Pooled analysis of midterm all-cause mortality demonstrated a statistically significant increase after TSc/TAx-TAVI compared with TF-TAVI (P = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Early all-cause mortality was lower after TSc/TAx-TAVI than TAp-TAVI or TAo-TAVI, early pacemaker implantation was more frequent after TSc/TAx-TAVI than TAp-TAVI or TAo-TAVI, and midterm all-cause mortality was higher after TSc/TAx-TAVI than TF-TAVI.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meta-analysis; Transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Transsubclavian/transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31076179     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung        ISSN: 0147-9563            Impact factor:   2.210


  5 in total

1.  Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Previous Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Ming Li; Jia-Yu Tsauo; Kai-Yu Jia; Yan-Biao Liao; Fan Xia; Zheng-Gang Zhao; Mao Chen; Yong Peng
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-02-10

Review 2.  Minireview: Transaortic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Is There Still an Indication?

Authors:  Lukas Stastny; Christoph Krapf; Julia Dumfarth; Simone Gasser; Axel Bauer; Guy Friedrich; Bernhard Metzler; Gudrun Feuchtner; Agnes Mayr; Michael Grimm; Nikolaos Bonaros
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-04

3.  Comparison of outcomes of trans-subclavian versus trans-apical approaches in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Olaf Tomala; Vipin Zamvar; Rong Bing; Renzo Pessotto; Nick Cruden
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 1.522

4.  Surgical transcatheter valve implantation: The more pathways, the better.

Authors:  Vito D Bruno; Gianni D Angelini
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 1.778

5.  A Sharp Right Turn: A Case of Aortic to Right Atrial Fistula During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Benjamin M Kristobak; Theodore J Cios
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.