| Literature DB >> 31075822 |
Vit Vsiansky1, Marketa Svobodova2,3, Jaromir Gumulec4,5,6, Natalia Cernei7,8, Dagmar Sterbova9, Ondrej Zitka10,11, Rom Kostrica12, Pavel Smilek13, Jan Plzak14, Jan Betka15, David Kalfert16, Michal Masarik17,18,19, Martina Raudenska20.
Abstract
Despite distinctive advances in the field of head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) biomarker discovery, the spectrum of clinically useful prognostic serum biomarkers is limited. As metabolic activities in highly proliferative transformed cells are fundamentally different from those in non-transformed cells, specific shifts in concentration of different metabolites may serve as diagnostic or prognostic markers. Blood amino acids have been identified as promising biomarkers in different cancers before, but little is known about this field in HNSCC. Blood amino acid profiles of 140 HNSCC patients were examined using high-performance liquid chromatography. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the prognostic value of amino acid concentrations in serum. Colony forming assay was used to identify the effect of amino acids that were significant in Cox proportional hazards regression models on colony forming ability of FaDu and Detroit 562 cell lines. In the multivariable Cox regression model for overall survival (OS), palliative treatment was associated with an unfavourable prognosis while high serum levels of methionine have had a positive prognostic impact. In the relapse-free survival (RFS) multivariable model, methionine was similarly identified as a positive prognostic factor, along with tumor localization in the oropharynx. Oral cavity localization and primary radio(chemo)therapy treatment strategy have been linked to poorer RFS. 1mM serine was shown to support the forming of colonies in both tested HNSCC cell lines. Effect of methionine was exactly the opposite.Entities:
Keywords: amino acids; blood biomarkers; colony forming assay; head and neck cancer; metabolism; prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31075822 PMCID: PMC6562773 DOI: 10.3390/cells8050428
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Clinicopathological features of the selected patient group (TNM 7th edition was used).
| Parameter | Level of Parameter | n |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 133 | |
| Female | 7 | |
| Median Age (Range) | 67 (48–93) | |
| Tumor Location | ||
| Oral Cavity | 20 | |
| Oropharynx | 54 | |
| Hypopharynx | 23 | |
| Larynx | 43 | |
| Differentiation | ||
| Low Grade | 8 | |
| Intermediate Grade | 101 | |
| High Grade | 31 | |
| T stage | ||
| T1 | 17 | |
| T2 | 44 | |
| T3 | 29 | |
| T4 | 50 | |
| N stage | ||
| N0 | 52 | |
| N1 | 19 | |
| N2 | 60 | |
| N3 | 9 | |
| M stage | ||
| M0 | 135 | |
| M1 | 5 | |
| Treatment | ||
| Surgery | 18 | |
| Surgery with adjuvant RT/CT | 44 | |
| Primary RT/CT | 63 | |
| Palliative | 15 |
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier plots for 5-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) stratified by statistically significant factors in the multivariate regression analysis: Serum concentration of methionine and overall survival (OS) (a), palliative treatment and OS (b), serum concentration of methionine and relapse-free survival (RFS) (c), oral cavity location and RFS (d), oropharyngeal location and RFS (e) and primary radio(chemo)therapy treatment and RFS (f). Data for statistically insignificant factors in the multivariable model are not shown.
Survival analysis.
| Parameter | Univariate | Multivariate | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
|
| |||
| Hypopharynx | >0.001 | 1.3596 (0.7103–2.6025) | 0.3538 |
| Oropharynx | 0.0314 | 0.7232 (0.3910–1.3376) | 0.3017 |
| T 3,4 vs. T 1,2 | 0.0486 | 1.5954 (0.9483–2.6843) | 0.0784 |
| N 2,3 vs. N 0,1 | 0.00776 | 1.7314 (0.9869–3.0374) | 0.0556 |
| Palliative Treatment | >0.001 | 3.6380 (1.2499–10.5885) | 0.0178 |
| Primary RT/CT | 0.0258 | 1.1562 (0.4655–2.8715) | 0.7545 |
| Surgery with adjuvant RT/CT | >0.001 | 0.3771 (0.1375–1.0338) | 0.0580 |
| Alanine | 0.00482 | 0.7182 (0.4138–1.2467) | 0.2395 |
| Cystine | 0.0331 | 1.0765 (0.6204–1.8679) | 0.7932 |
| Methionine | >0.001 | 0.5248 (0.3056–0.9013) | 0.0195 |
| RFS | |||
| Oral Cavity | 0.0223 | 4.6898 (1.49124–14.7489) | 0.00820 |
| Oropharynx | 0.00292 | 0.2998 (0.09951–0.9034) | 0.03232 |
| Primary RT/CT | 0.0181 | 5.1464 (1.89193–13.9992) | 0.00133 |
| Threonine | 0.033 | 0.2893 (0.06630–1.2623) | 0.09892 |
| Methionine | 0.0136 | 0.4373 (0.19240–0.9941) | 0.04836 |
OS, 5-year overall survival (OS); RFS, 5-year relapse free survival; HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 2Colony-forming assays, in vitro cell line experiment on head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) primary (FaDu) and secondary (Detroit 562) cell lines. Shown area percentage of well area covered by cells after treatment in concentration 500 cells/well. (A) displayed as median and interquartile range, * indicate p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001 (B) representative wells, calibration chart denotes 10 mm.