Hanbo Chen1, Joanna M Laba1, Sondos Zayed1, R Gabriel Boldt1, David A Palma1, Alexander V Louie2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. 2. Odette Cancer Centre - Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: Alexander.Louie@sunnybrook.ca.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The safety and effectiveness of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with ultra-central lung tumors is currently unclear. We performed a systematic review to summarize existing data and identify trends in treatment-related toxicity and local control following SABR in patients with ultra-central lung lesions. METHODS: We performed a systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the PubMed and Embase databases. The databases were queried from dates of inception until September 27, 2018. Studies in the English language that reported treatment-related toxicity and local control outcomes post-SABR for patients with ultra-central lung lesions were included. Guidelines, reviews, non-peer reviewed correspondences, studies focused on re-irradiation, and studies with fewer than five patients were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 446 studies were identified, with 10 meeting all criteria for inclusion. The total sample size from the identified studies was 250 ultra-central lung patients and all studies were retrospective in design. Radiotherapy dose and fractionation ranged from 30 to 60 Gy in 3 to 12 fractions, with biologically effective doses (BED10) ranging from 48 to 138 Gy10 (median, 78-103 Gy10). Median treatment-related grade 3 or greater toxicity was 10% (range, 0-50%). Median treatment-related mortality was 5% (range, 0-22%), most commonly from pulmonary hemorrhage (55%). High-risk indicators for SABR-related mortality included gross endobronchial disease, maximum dose to the proximal bronchial tree greater than or equal to 180 Gy3 (BED3, corresponding to 45 Gy in 5 fractions or 55 Gy in 8 fractions), peri-SABR bevacizumab use, and antiplatelet/anticoagulant use. Median 1-year local control rate was 96% (range, 63%-100%) and 2-year local control rate was 92% (range, 57%-100%). CONCLUSIONS: SABR for ultra-central lung lesions appears feasible but there is a potential for severe toxicity in patients receiving high doses to the proximal bronchial tree, those with endobronchial disease, and those receiving bevacizumab or anticoagulants around the time of SABR. Prospective studies are required to establish the optimal doses, volumes, and normal tissue tolerances for SABR in this patient population. Crown
INTRODUCTION: The safety and effectiveness of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with ultra-central lung tumors is currently unclear. We performed a systematic review to summarize existing data and identify trends in treatment-related toxicity and local control following SABR in patients with ultra-central lung lesions. METHODS: We performed a systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the PubMed and Embase databases. The databases were queried from dates of inception until September 27, 2018. Studies in the English language that reported treatment-related toxicity and local control outcomes post-SABR for patients with ultra-central lung lesions were included. Guidelines, reviews, non-peer reviewed correspondences, studies focused on re-irradiation, and studies with fewer than five patients were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 446 studies were identified, with 10 meeting all criteria for inclusion. The total sample size from the identified studies was 250 ultra-central lung patients and all studies were retrospective in design. Radiotherapy dose and fractionation ranged from 30 to 60 Gy in 3 to 12 fractions, with biologically effective doses (BED10) ranging from 48 to 138 Gy10 (median, 78-103 Gy10). Median treatment-related grade 3 or greater toxicity was 10% (range, 0-50%). Median treatment-related mortality was 5% (range, 0-22%), most commonly from pulmonary hemorrhage (55%). High-risk indicators for SABR-related mortality included gross endobronchial disease, maximum dose to the proximal bronchial tree greater than or equal to 180 Gy3 (BED3, corresponding to 45 Gy in 5 fractions or 55 Gy in 8 fractions), peri-SABRbevacizumab use, and antiplatelet/anticoagulant use. Median 1-year local control rate was 96% (range, 63%-100%) and 2-year local control rate was 92% (range, 57%-100%). CONCLUSIONS:SABR for ultra-central lung lesions appears feasible but there is a potential for severe toxicity in patients receiving high doses to the proximal bronchial tree, those with endobronchial disease, and those receiving bevacizumab or anticoagulants around the time of SABR. Prospective studies are required to establish the optimal doses, volumes, and normal tissue tolerances for SABR in this patient population. Crown
Authors: C Faivre-Finn; J D Fenwick; K N Franks; S Harrow; M Q F Hatton; C Hiley; J J McAleese; F McDonald; J O'Hare; C Peedell; T Pope; C Powell; R Rulach; E Toy Journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Michael C Tjong; Nauman H Malik; Hanbo Chen; R Gabriel Boldt; George Li; Patrick Cheung; Ian Poon; Yee C Ung; May Tsao; Alexander V Louie Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Sebastian Regnery; Carolin Buchele; Fabian Weykamp; Moritz Pohl; Philipp Hoegen; Tanja Eichkorn; Thomas Held; Jonas Ristau; Carolin Rippke; Laila König; Michael Thomas; Hauke Winter; Sebastian Adeberg; Jürgen Debus; Sebastian Klüter; Juliane Hörner-Rieber Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Benjamin J Rich; Benjamin O Spieler; Yidong Yang; Lori Young; William Amestoy; Maria Monterroso; Lora Wang; Alan Dal Pra; Fei Yang Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-07-22 Impact factor: 5.738