Literature DB >> 31075056

Effect of Prenatal Repair of Myelomeningocele on Urological Outcomes at School Age.

John W Brock1, John C Thomas1, Laurence S Baskin2, Stephen A Zderic3,4, Elizabeth A Thom5, Pamela K Burrows5, Hanmin Lee6, Amy J Houtrow7, Cora MacPherson5, N Scott Adzick8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated longer term urological outcomes in patients enrolled in the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women who participated in the original trial were asked for consent for followup for their child at age 6 years or older in a single comprehensive study visit to a MOMS center. Participating children underwent urological and radiologic procedures to provide objective evidence of current bladder functioning. Primary urological outcome was defined as any among need for clean intermittent catheterization, vesicostomy, urethral dilatation or augmentation cystoplasty.
RESULTS: A total of 156 children were evaluated, with a mean age of 7.4 years. Overall 62% vs 87% in the prenatal and postnatal surgery groups, respectively, were placed on clean intermittent catheterization (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.86, p <0.001). Voiding status was significantly different between the groups (p <0.001) as 24% in the prenatal group vs 4% in the postnatal group (RR 5.8, 95% CI 1.8-18.7) were reported to be voiding volitionally. Augmentation cystoplasty, vesicostomy and urethral dilation did not differ between the 2 groups. Aside from a larger post-void residual urodynamic catheterization volume, there were no other statistical differences in videourodynamic data or findings on renal/bladder ultrasound.
CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal closure of myelomeningocele resulted in less reported clean intermittent catheterization at school age and the mechanism for this is unclear. Although most children are in diapers or on clean intermittent catheterization, parental reports showed children who underwent prenatal closure may be more likely to void volitionally than the postnatal group. Despite these findings, urological outcomes alone should not be the sole impetus to perform in utero closure in children with spina bifida.

Entities:  

Keywords:  meningomyelocele; postnatal care; prenatal care; spinal dysraphism

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31075056     DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

1.  The Construction of a Predictive Composite Index for Decision-Making of CSF Diversion Surgery in Pediatric Patients following Prenatal Myelomeningocele Repair.

Authors:  F T Mangano; M Altaye; C B Stevenson; W Yuan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.966

2.  Functional, morphological and molecular characteristics in a novel rat model of spinal sacral nerve injury-surgical approach, pathological process and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Junyang Li; Shiqiang Li; Yu Wang; Aijia Shang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Fetal myelomeningocele repair: a narrative review of the history, current controversies and future directions.

Authors:  Kaeli J Yamashiro; Diana L Farmer
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2021-05

4.  Preclinical stem cell therapy in fetuses with myelomeningocele: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yada Kunpalin; Sindhu Subramaniam; Silvia Perin; Mattia F M Gerli; Jan Bosteels; Sebastien Ourselin; Jan Deprest; Paolo De Coppi; Anna L David
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.242

5.  In utero myelomeningocele repair and high-risk bladder pattern. a prospective study.

Authors:  Antonio Macedo; Sérgio Leite Ottoni; Antonio Moron; Sergio Cavalheiro; Marcela Leal da Cruz
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Neurosurgical procedures for children with myelomeningocele after fetal or postnatal surgery: a comparative effectiveness study.

Authors:  Gordon Worley; Rachel G Greenberg; Brandon G Rocque; Tiebin Liu; Brad E Dicianno; Jonathan P Castillo; Elisabeth A Ward; Tonya R Williams; Jeffrey P Blount; John S Wiener
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 5.449

7.  Fetoscopic myelomeningocoele closure: Is the scientific evidence enough to challenge the gold standard for prenatal surgery?

Authors:  E Joanne Verweij; Martine C de Vries; Esther J Oldekamp; Alex J Eggink; Dick Oepkes; Femke Slaghekke; Jochem K H Spoor; Jan A Deprest; Jena L Miller; Ahmet A Baschat; Philip L J DeKoninck
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.050

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.